Assessment Practices Review Panel - St. Louis County

More documents

Recommendations

Info

71-21 766 2012 Pay 2013 <strong>County</strong>-Assessed Jurisdictions 70-20 742 70-21 765 70-20 741 70-19 733 70-18 719 K A B ET O G A M A 40 2 68-21 763 69-20 740 68-20 739 69-19 732 68-19 731 69-18 718 68-18 717 69-17 704 68-15 670 68-13 632 68-14 657 C R A N E L A K E 67-21 308 67-20 67-19 67-18 67-15 67-14 762 738 730 716 669 656 67-13 631 66-21 761 65-21 760 66-20 735 LEID I N G 425 C A M P FIV E 278 PO RTA G E 510 66-16 686 65-16 685 66-15 668 65-15 667 66-14 655 65-14 654 66-13 630 65-13 629 66-12 615 65-12 614 64-21 759 ORR 180 64-17 699 64-16 684 64-15 666 64-14 653 64-1 3 62 8 64-1 2 61 3 63-21 758 62-21 757 W IL L O W VA LLE Y 575 LIN D EN G R O V E 430 63-19 728 FIE LD 350 0 B E AT T Y 250 COOK 120 O W E N S 495 63-17 698 62-17 697 G R E E N W O O D 387 TOWER 80 63-15 665 B R E IT U N G 270 63-1 4 65 2 EA G L ES N EST 317 M O R S E 465 WINTON 190 ELY 30 M O R C O M 460 ST U R G EO N 545 A LA N G O 200 A N G O R A 215 61-17 696 V ERM IL IO N L A K E 560 K U G L ER 410 61-14 650 61-13 625 61-12 610 60-19 FR EN C H 60-20 60-18 SA N D Y PIK E WA A SA 725 370 734 713 525 505 565 B A B ITT 105 E M B A R R A SS 330 59-21 755 G R E AT SC O T T 385 W U O R I 580 59-16 679 H O Y T LA K E S 142 55-21 752 C ED A R VA LLE Y 285 52-21 750 H A LD EN 390 PR A IR IE L A K E 515 H IB B IN G 139 140 141 B A LK A N 235 BUHL 115 CHISHOLM 20 E LM E R 325 VA N B U R E N 555 FLOODWOOD 125 F L O O D W O O D 3 6 0 FIN E L A K E S 355 L AV E L L 420 TO IV O LA 550 Created 10/31/11 C H E R RY 290 N ESS 470 KINNEY 150 BROOKSTON 110 A R R O W H E A D 2 2 5 M O U N TA IN IR O N 175 LEONIDAS 156 C L IN T O N 295 M cD AV IT T 435 K ELS E Y 405 MEADOWLANDS 165 M E A D O W L A N D S 440 A LBO R N 205 C U LV E R 310 STO N E Y B R O O K 535 V IR G IN IA 90 EVELETH 40 IRON JUNCTION 145 56-17 690 B R EVAT O R 275 McKINLEY 160 G I L BE RT 60 E L LS B U R G 320 N O RT H L A N D 490 NEW INDEPEND ENC E 475 IN D U ST R IA L 400 C O T T O N 305 B IW A B I K 15 B IWA B IK 260 57-16 677 56-16 676 53-16 673 G R A N D L A K E 380 SO LW AY 530 A U R O R A 1 0 MID WAY 450 W H IT E 570 FA YA L 3 4 0 57-14 C O LV IN 300 55-15 662 54-15 661 53-15 660 F R E D E N B E R G 3 6 5 C A N O SIA 280 H E R M A N T O W N 3 9 5 58-14 644 643 56-14 642 55-14 641 54-14 640 G N ES EN 375 R IC E LA K E 520 D U LU T H 10 PROCTOR 185 54-13 620 N O RT H STA R 488 N O R M A N N A 485 D U LU T H 315 LA K E W O O D 415 B A SS ETT 240 FA IR B A N K S 335 A U LT 230 PE Q UAY WAN 502 A LD E N 210 Legend Beth Sokoloski, 749-7100 x7424 Bob Wiinanen, 749-7100 x7278 Chris Link, 365-8208 Dan Christensen, 749-7100 x7331 Dave Christensen, 726-2376 Dave Jarvela, 749-7100 x7425 Donna House, 726-2377 Mike Harvey, 749-7100 x7279 Noah Mittlefehldt, 726-2387 Patrick Orent, 749-7100 x7219 Rodella LaFreniere, 726-2428 <strong>St</strong>eve Walczynski, 726-2306 Tom Carlson, 726-2301
Appendix III Local Assessor Policies and Procedures
Page 1: Assessment Practices Review Panel F
Page 4 and 5: St. Louis County Assessment Practic
Page 6 and 7: - Rick Puhek, Virginia City Assesso
Page 8 and 9: 4 Final Recommendations and Conclud
Page 10 and 11: The panel members recommend impleme
Page 12 and 13: - Continued budget demands and aid
Page 14 and 15: Following this, the panel held four
Page 16 and 17: agricultural describe the primary u
Page 18 and 19: The State Board of Assessors has ra
Page 20 and 21: Reviewing Sales In Minnesota, whene
Page 22 and 23: Figure 2.2: Overview of Statutory b
Page 24 and 25: 2.4.2 County practices The St. Loui
Page 26 and 27: 3 Panel Charge and Findings 3.1 Int
Page 28 and 29: addressed at the local level. It al
Page 30 and 31: - Increased pressure on county staf
Page 32 and 33: - Build a coalition with the local
Page 34 and 35: 3.4.3 Recommendations to improve fu
Page 36 and 37: Assessor’s office operates. The D
Page 38 and 39: When considering new technology int
Page 40 and 41: Public perception of changing to a
Page 42 and 43: for an aging workforce of local ass
Page 44 and 45: Appendix I Map of Statewide Assessm
Page 46 and 47: Appendix II Map of St. Louis County
Page 55 and 56: Appendix IV St. Louis County Fee Sc
Page 57 and 58: LAST 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Notes
Page 59 and 60: 2009-2011 Estimated City of Duluth
Page 61 and 62: Panel Findings and Recommendations
Page 63 and 64: Current Assessment Practices Findin
Page 65 and 66: Current Assessment Practices Findin
Page 67 and 68: Funding of Assessment Process Findi
Page 69 and 70: Succession Planning Finding Impact
Page 71 and 72: Appendix VII Existing and Emerging
Page 73: Public Records & Property Valuation
Page 76 and 77: 12' 12' Legend Planimetric Boundary

Assessment Practices Review Panel - St. Louis County

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?