State v. Henderson and the New Model Jury Charges - New Jersey ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Lineup Construction. Did the array or lineup contain only one suspect embedded among at least five innocent fillers? Did the suspect stand out from other members of the lineup?
Page 1 and 2: Criminal Litigation Track State v H
Page 3 and 4: What was Henderson All About? • H
Page 6 and 7: “Human memory is not foolproof. R
Page 8 and 9: Non-exhaustive list of system varia
Page 10 and 11: Blind Lineup Procedures prevent: Ve
Page 12 and 13: Witness Instructions • Who scored
Page 17: Description: • Caucasian • Tall
Page 20 and 21: Feedback. Did the witness receive a
Page 22 and 23: Mean Eyewitness Confidence in Their
Page 24 and 25: Recording Confidence. Did the admin
Page 26 and 27: Multiple Viewings. Did the witness
Page 28 and 29: Showups 27
Page 30 and 31: Other Identifications Made. Did the
Page 32 and 33: Stress. Did the event involve a hig
Page 34 and 35: Weapon focus. Was a visible weapon
Page 36 and 37: Duration. How much time did the wit
Page 38 and 39: Distance and Lighting. How close we
Page 40 and 41: Distance 134 Feet
Page 46 and 47: Alcohol “Intoxication: The influe
Page 48 and 49: Dubbs: Convicted Brown: Confessed 5
Page 50 and 51: Memory decay. How much time elapsed
Page 53 and 54: Race-bias. •Does the case involve
Page 55 and 56: Question 2. Please select the racia
Page 57 and 58: Objective v. Subjective • Born =
Page 59 and 60: The End . . . For Now . . . Present
Page 61 and 62: “Fourth, if after weighing the ev
Page 63 and 64: “The hearing would encompass syst
Page 65 and 66:
“We find that feedback affects th
Page 67 and 68:
a-8-08.opn.html « Citation Data Or
Page 69 and 70:
a-8-08.opn.html HELD: The current l
Page 71 and 72:
a-8-08.opn.html in CHIEF JUSTICE RA
Page 73 and 74:
a-8-08.opn.html Multiple Viewings .
Page 75 and 76:
a-8-08.opn.html We find that the sc
Page 77 and 78:
a-8-08.opn.html II. Facts and Proce
Page 79 and 80:
a-8-08.opn.html Pub. Safety, Attorn
Page 81 and 82:
a-8-08.opn.html Womble did not reca
Page 83 and 84:
a-8-08.opn.html perpetrator when he
Page 85 and 86:
a-8-08.opn.html summarily to the tr
Page 87 and 88:
a-8-08.opn.html are derived mostly
Page 89 and 90:
a-8-08.opn.html suspects actually s
Page 91 and 92:
a-8-08.opn.html group. Instead, onl
Page 93 and 94:
a-8-08.opn.html identification evid
Page 95 and 96:
a-8-08.opn.html “say that under a
Page 97 and 98:
a-8-08.opn.html published articles
Page 99 and 100:
a-8-08.opn.html imperfect proxies f
Page 101 and 102:
a-8-08.opn.html Palmer, Reconstruct
Page 103 and 104:
a-8-08.opn.html 1. Blind Administra
Page 105 and 106:
a-8-08.opn.html The scientists agre
Page 107 and 108:
a-8-08.opn.html parties, courts, an
Page 109 and 110:
a-8-08.opn.html section VI.B.9. See
Page 111 and 112:
a-8-08.opn.html the lineup member t
Page 113 and 114:
a-8-08.opn.html presented to a witn
Page 115 and 116:
a-8-08.opn.html processing and migh
Page 117 and 118:
a-8-08.opn.html The duration of the
Page 119 and 120:
a-8-08.opn.html But the target’s
Page 121 and 122:
a-8-08.opn.html given by other witn
Page 123 and 124:
a-8-08.opn.html partner) were signi
Page 125 and 126:
a-8-08.opn.html The parties devote
Page 127 and 128:
a-8-08.opn.html Saul M. Kassin et a
Page 129 and 130:
a-8-08.opn.html fillers based on th
Page 131 and 132:
a-8-08.opn.html Stat. § 175.50. VI
Page 133 and 134:
a-8-08.opn.html identification proc
Page 135 and 136:
a-8-08.opn.html identifications, im
Page 137 and 138:
a-8-08.opn.html lighting conditions
Page 139 and 140:
a-8-08.opn.html identification is r
Page 141 and 142:
a-8-08.opn.html discretion to focus
Page 143 and 144:
a-8-08.opn.html care and better ref
Page 145 and 146:
a-8-08.opn.html evaluates trace evi
Page 147 and 148:
a-8-08.opn.html Other federal and s
Page 149 and 150:
a-8-08.opn.html In addition to sugg
Page 151 and 152:
a-8-08.opn.html today). As to futur
Page 153 and 154:
a-8-08.opn.html This matter having
Page 155 and 156:
a-8-08.opn.html briefs; and it is f
Page 157 and 158:
a-8-08.opn.html 1 United States v.
Page 159:
STATE V. HENDERSON FREDRIC M. KNAPP
Page 164 and 165:
What does it do Strikes a balance
Page 166 and 167:
What it ain’t Henderson rejected
Page 168 and 169:
CHANGES WROUGHT Possible expanded
Page 170 and 171:
System Variables to Trigger a Heari
Page 172 and 173:
RECORDING & DOCUMENTATION STATE V.
Page 174 and 175:
RECORDING & DOCUMENTATION New requ
Page 176 and 177:
AG GUIDELINES STEP 2: Creating the
Page 178 and 179:
AG GUIDELINES STEP 4: Document & R
Page 180 and 181:
Showup Show-ups •a. Must be withi
Page 182 and 183:
R. 3:11 and R. 3:13-3(c)(10) New C
Page 184 and 185:
Estimator Variables Variables whic
Page 186 and 187:
Estimator Variables 4. Distance an
Page 188 and 189:
Estimator Variables Some of the ab
Page 190 and 191:
Jury Instructions State v Green: J
Page 192 and 193:
SYSTEM VARIABLES 1. Blind Administr
Page 194 and 195:
Robert J. Brass is a partner of the
Page 196:
Joshua Sanders’s Bio for NJSBA 20
show all

State v. Henderson and the New Model Jury Charges - New Jersey ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?