- Page 1 and 2:
Criminal Litigation Track State v H
- Page 3 and 4:
What was Henderson All About? • H
- Page 6 and 7:
“Human memory is not foolproof. R
- Page 8 and 9:
Non-exhaustive list of system varia
- Page 10 and 11:
Blind Lineup Procedures prevent: Ve
- Page 12 and 13:
Witness Instructions • Who scored
- Page 14:
Lineup Construction. Did the array
- Page 19 and 20:
The Perpetrator was Described as a
- Page 21 and 22:
Feedback to Witnesses • Wells and
- Page 23 and 24:
Other studies by Wells and his stud
- Page 25 and 26:
A Problem: Confidence malleability.
- Page 27 and 28:
Showups. •Did the police perform
- Page 29 and 30:
Private Actors. •Private Actors =
- Page 31 and 32:
Non-exhaustive list of estimator va
- Page 33 and 34:
Stress • Identification accuracy
- Page 35 and 36:
Weapon Focus ID accuracy is reduced
- Page 37 and 38:
Duration • Witnesses frequently o
- Page 39 and 40:
Distance • IMPORTANT STUDY: Loftu
- Page 41 and 42:
Distance 100 Feet
- Page 43 and 44:
Distance 20 Feet
- Page 45 and 46:
Distance 271 Feet
- Page 47 and 48:
Characteristics of Perpetrator. Was
- Page 49 and 50:
Disguise and Identification accurac
- Page 51:
Common belief: Memory Decay
- Page 54 and 55:
First, Let’s Identify What Race R
- Page 56 and 57:
OWN-RACE BIAS Meissner & Brigham (2
- Page 58 and 59:
Must Add: The Court specifically ad
- Page 60 and 61:
State v. Henderson, 208 N.J. 208 (2
- Page 62 and 63:
4. Distance and Lighting. How close
- Page 64 and 65:
Trial “Expert testimony may also
- Page 66 and 67:
“Disguises and changes in facial
- Page 68 and 69:
a-8-08.opn.html eyewitness identifi
- Page 70 and 71:
a-8-08.opn.html an identification i
- Page 72 and 73:
a-8-08.opn.html Barry C. Scheck, a
- Page 74 and 75:
a-8-08.opn.html XII. Retroactivity
- Page 76 and 77:
a-8-08.opn.html broader approach, w
- Page 78 and 79:
a-8-08.opn.html Harper slumped over
- Page 80 and 81:
a-8-08.opn.html your selection. It
- Page 82 and 83:
a-8-08.opn.html said that he “rea
- Page 84 and 85:
a-8-08.opn.html 7.2. Defendant appe
- Page 86 and 87:
a-8-08.opn.html holds a Ph.D., and
- Page 88 and 89:
a-8-08.opn.html court failed to ins
- Page 90 and 91:
a-8-08.opn.html experiments, Dr. Pe
- Page 92 and 93:
a-8-08.opn.html Applied Cognitive P
- Page 94 and 95:
a-8-08.opn.html o.b., 135 N.J. 3 (1
- Page 96 and 97:
a-8-08.opn.html convincing than a w
- Page 98 and 99:
a-8-08.opn.html reviewed journals.
- Page 100 and 101:
a-8-08.opn.html are tied to an incr
- Page 102 and 103:
a-8-08.opn.html We review each of t
- Page 104 and 105:
a-8-08.opn.html The consequences ar
- Page 106 and 107:
a-8-08.opn.html Second, lineups sho
- Page 108 and 109:
a-8-08.opn.html Delay, 9 J. Experim
- Page 110 and 111:
a-8-08.opn.html included in a later
- Page 112 and 113:
a-8-08.opn.html depicted in the com
- Page 114 and 115:
a-8-08.opn.html research reveals th
- Page 116 and 117:
a-8-08.opn.html Although the study
- Page 118 and 119:
a-8-08.opn.html e.g., R.C.L. Lindsa
- Page 120 and 121: a-8-08.opn.html 7. Memory Decay Mem
- Page 122 and 123: a-8-08.opn.html either through conv
- Page 124 and 125: a-8-08.opn.html Laboratory studies
- Page 126 and 127: a-8-08.opn.html possible to replica
- Page 128 and 129: a-8-08.opn.html of the eyewitness c
- Page 130 and 131: a-8-08.opn.html The Attorney Genera
- Page 132 and 133: a-8-08.opn.html Along with Manson/M
- Page 134 and 135: a-8-08.opn.html of an identificatio
- Page 136 and 137: a-8-08.opn.html produce “an impre
- Page 138 and 139: a-8-08.opn.html evaluating eyewitne
- Page 140 and 141: a-8-08.opn.html 5. Recording Confid
- Page 142 and 143: a-8-08.opn.html “memory decay”
- Page 144 and 145: a-8-08.opn.html focus on system var
- Page 146 and 147: a-8-08.opn.html (2006). A simple re
- Page 148 and 149: a-8-08.opn.html have found scientif
- Page 150 and 151: a-8-08.opn.html The remaining two f
- Page 152 and 153: a-8-08.opn.html and appropriate jur
- Page 154 and 155: a-8-08.opn.html possible shortcomin
- Page 156 and 157: a-8-08.opn.html DECIDED August 24,
- Page 158 and 159: a-8-08.opn.html of Illinois: The Il
- Page 163 and 164: Overview State v Henderson, decide
- Page 165 and 166: Issues and Authorities Involved U.
- Page 167 and 168: CHANGES WROUGHT New vocabulary: Sy
- Page 169: Henderson Holding Henderson has ma
- Page 173 and 174: RECORDING & DOCUMENTATION Document
- Page 175 and 176: AG GUIDELINES STEP 1: Determine wh
- Page 177 and 178: AG GUIDELINES STEP 3: Showing the
- Page 179 and 180: Sequential vs. Simultaneous • SEQ
- Page 181 and 182: TRIAL PROCEDURES & EVIDENTIARY ISSU
- Page 183 and 184: Text of New Court Rules
- Page 185 and 186: Estimator Variables 1. Stress. Did
- Page 187 and 188: Estimator Variables 7. Memory deca
- Page 189 and 190: Important points for litigation 1)
- Page 191 and 192: Identification: In-Court and Out-of
- Page 193 and 194: ESTIMATOR VARIABLES 1. Stress. Did
- Page 195 and 196: Hon. Lisa Rose, J.S.C. Judge Rose t