04.05.2015 Views

Money Laundering: Review of the Reporting ... - Dematerialised ID

Money Laundering: Review of the Reporting ... - Dematerialised ID

Money Laundering: Review of the Reporting ... - Dematerialised ID

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

kpmg<br />

<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regime for handling Suspicious Activity Reports<br />

Report <strong>of</strong> recommendations<br />

KPMG LLP<br />

maximum benefit is derived by LEAs from <strong>the</strong>ir receipt <strong>of</strong> SARs (section 8). Section 9<br />

summarises <strong>the</strong> recommendations and sets out a proposed timetable for implementing<br />

<strong>the</strong>m.<br />

1.3 Appointment <strong>of</strong> KPMG<br />

1.3.1 KPMG were appointed to review and report on <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regime for<br />

handling SARs on 15 November 2002. This followed a successful application by NCIS<br />

to <strong>the</strong> Recovered Assets Fund (“RAF”) for funding for this review.<br />

1.3.2 We conducted a review <strong>of</strong> a pilot sample <strong>of</strong> SARs and designed a questionnaire for<br />

completion by attendees at <strong>the</strong> National Financial Investigators Conference in November<br />

2002. Our detailed work programme was <strong>the</strong>n set out in a variation to <strong>the</strong> initial<br />

engagement letter dated 23 January 2003 following discussion with ECB and <strong>the</strong> Project<br />

Management Panel (“PMP”) 1 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pilot phase at its meeting in December<br />

2002.<br />

1.3.3 The key elements <strong>of</strong> our fieldwork prior to producing our report were agreed to be:<br />

• Tracking a sample <strong>of</strong> 200 SARs from disclosing institutions to identify <strong>the</strong> processes<br />

and timing from recognition <strong>of</strong> a suspicious transaction to submission <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SAR to<br />

NCIS.<br />

• Conducting a survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> key work stages at ECB (input, validation and<br />

dissemination).<br />

• Tracking a sample <strong>of</strong> 600 SARs sent by ECB to LEAs to assess <strong>the</strong>ir ultimate<br />

outcome.<br />

• Obtaining detailed responses to questionnaires from 62 entities which provide SARs,<br />

including <strong>the</strong> 12 which provided those identified in <strong>the</strong> initial sample <strong>of</strong> 200, and <strong>the</strong><br />

57 LEAs which handle <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

• Following up and validating our fieldwork through meetings and workshops.<br />

1.4 Objectives <strong>of</strong> report<br />

1.4.1 The invitation to tender document noted that <strong>the</strong> UK Asset Recovery Committee (“ARC”)<br />

wished to commission “an independent review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> process used in <strong>the</strong> UK for <strong>the</strong><br />

handling and dissemination <strong>of</strong> STRs.” It stated that <strong>the</strong> key objective <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> report was to<br />

1 The Project Management Panel was established as a forum for KPMG to report back to<br />

stakeholders and interested parties on <strong>the</strong> progress <strong>of</strong> our work and to allow informed discussion <strong>of</strong><br />

our initial and interim findings.<br />

jo/fh/519 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!