04.05.2015 Views

Money Laundering: Review of the Reporting ... - Dematerialised ID

Money Laundering: Review of the Reporting ... - Dematerialised ID

Money Laundering: Review of the Reporting ... - Dematerialised ID

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

kpmg<br />

<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regime for handling Suspicious Activity Reports<br />

Report <strong>of</strong> recommendations<br />

KPMG LLP<br />

meeting <strong>the</strong> specified access and usage protocols). Indirect searches <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Alert system<br />

could also be requested via <strong>the</strong> FIU, although <strong>the</strong>se would need to be conducted through<br />

<strong>the</strong> NCIS regional <strong>of</strong>fices (as is currently <strong>the</strong> case) to ensure that <strong>the</strong> confidentiality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Alert scheme is maintained.<br />

8.4.19 Some LEAs (e.g. <strong>the</strong> Metropolitan Police Service) have identified that <strong>the</strong>y achieve<br />

successful results from using <strong>the</strong> information contained in SARs having transferred <strong>the</strong><br />

SAR data onto a local intelligence database. We believe that <strong>the</strong>re are LEAs where this is<br />

appropriate and that <strong>the</strong> feasibility and costs <strong>of</strong> doing it within <strong>the</strong> new procedures should<br />

be explored in developing implementation plans. Where this does take place however,<br />

<strong>the</strong> LEA would still need to meet all our o<strong>the</strong>r recommendations including, in particular,<br />

updating Elmer on <strong>the</strong> progress <strong>of</strong> all SARs allocated to <strong>the</strong>m through <strong>the</strong>ir Elmer queue.<br />

8.5 Monitoring LEA results and establishment <strong>of</strong> new service level<br />

agreements<br />

Recommendation 18<br />

Establishment <strong>of</strong> new SLAs between ECB and LEAs<br />

8.5.1 New SLAs should be established between ECB and each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> LEAs to document <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

various responsibilities under <strong>the</strong> new structure and approach. These should include<br />

indicative timings for <strong>the</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> information between each party (e.g. ECB will<br />

ensure that new SARs are added to Elmer within XX days <strong>of</strong> receipt from a disclosing<br />

entity, LEAs will provide an initial indication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> all SARs on <strong>the</strong>ir queue<br />

within YY days <strong>of</strong> receipt and commit to update this information on a rolling monthly<br />

basis).<br />

ECB monitoring and reporting <strong>of</strong> LEA results<br />

8.5.2 In order to ensure that <strong>the</strong> appropriate information is input onto Elmer in a timely fashion,<br />

and to ensure that individual LEAs are meeting <strong>the</strong>ir commitments under <strong>the</strong>ir SLAs with<br />

ECB, ECB should monitor <strong>the</strong> results achieved by each LEA through <strong>the</strong>ir regular<br />

updates <strong>of</strong> information on Elmer. It should use <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> this monitoring to provide<br />

feedback on a quarterly basis to each LEA. This will ensure that <strong>the</strong>re is an ongoing<br />

dialogue between ECB and <strong>the</strong> individual LEAs on <strong>the</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> concern that each has in<br />

<strong>the</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> ECB’s processes for SARs and <strong>the</strong> LEA’s use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> information<br />

contained <strong>the</strong>rein in investigating and disrupting criminal activity. This monitoring<br />

should cover at <strong>the</strong> least:<br />

• The numbers <strong>of</strong> SARs which are allocated, developed, which are o<strong>the</strong>rwise open and<br />

those which have been marked as intelligence only, and information on <strong>the</strong> time taken<br />

from receipt to progression.<br />

• The timeliness <strong>of</strong> LEA updates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> status and progress <strong>of</strong> individual SARs.<br />

• The timeliness and content <strong>of</strong> feedback provided by LEAs on <strong>the</strong> outcomes <strong>of</strong><br />

successful use <strong>of</strong> SARs in investigations, prosecutions and asset recovery.<br />

8.5.3 The results <strong>of</strong> this monitoring should be made available to <strong>the</strong> Task Force on a half-yearly<br />

basis to allow it to achieve its objective <strong>of</strong> assessing <strong>the</strong> success <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SAR regime as a<br />

jo/fh/519 76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!