02.06.2015 Views

2005 SAGES Abstracts

2005 SAGES Abstracts

2005 SAGES Abstracts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

POSTER ABSTRACTS<br />

<strong>SAGES</strong> <strong>2005</strong><br />

junostomy was created using a combined linear stapled and<br />

handsewn technique. Three patients were converted to open<br />

procedure (0.6%). There were 500 females and 20 males. Mean<br />

age was 40 years (range 18-65) and mean preoperative body<br />

mass index was 46.4 kg/m2 (range 36-68). Mean follow-up for<br />

all patients was 11 months and mean excess weight loss at 18<br />

months was 70%. None of the patients presented stomal<br />

stenosis postoperatively. Eleven (2.1%) were diagnosed with<br />

marginal ulceration by upper endoscopy. Stomal stenosis is an<br />

infrequent complication following retrocolic-retrogastric<br />

laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with combined linear<br />

stapled and handsewn gastrojejunostomy. A reduction in Roux<br />

limb tension with the retrocolic-retrogastric approach may play<br />

a role in reducing the incidence of this complication.<br />

P230–Complications of Surgery<br />

LATE GASTRIC PERFORATIONS AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC FUN-<br />

DOPLICATION, K L Huguet MD, T Berland,R A Hinder, Mayo<br />

Clinic Jacksonville<br />

Introduction: Late complications are rarely encountered after<br />

laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF). We report a series of<br />

delayed gastric perforations complicating LNF and review the<br />

potential etiologies.<br />

Methods: In the authors? series of 1600 laparoscopic antireflux<br />

procedures performed between July 1991 and March 2002, we<br />

report a new finding of six delayed gastric fundal perforations<br />

in three patients 1, 41, 48, 51, 60, and 64 months after surgery.<br />

All had been taking celecoxib.<br />

Patient # 1: 71 yo WM presented 3 years after LNF with pneumoperitoneum<br />

while on celecoxib. Exploratory laparotomy<br />

revealed a gastric perforation on the gastric fundus, which was<br />

oversewn. Several months later the patient again presented<br />

with pneumoperitoneum and exploratory laparotomy revealed<br />

a gastric perforation at the same site, which was oversewn.<br />

Patient # 2: 58 yo WF presented 1 month after LNF with pneumoperitoneum<br />

while on celecoxib. Exploratory laparotomy<br />

revealed a gastric perforation on the anterior surface of the<br />

fundus. This was oversewn without complications.<br />

Patient #3: 67 yo WM presented 4 years after a LNF with pneumoperitoneum<br />

while on celecoxib. Exploratory laparotomy<br />

revealed no source. One year later the patient again presented<br />

with pneumoperitoneum and exploratory laparotomy revealed<br />

a gastric perforation on the anterior surface of the fundoplication,<br />

which was oversewn. Several months later the patient<br />

again presented with pneumoperitoneum. He recovered well<br />

after percutaneous aspiration and medical management.<br />

All patients had minimal peritoneal contamination leading to<br />

the conservative management of patient # 3.<br />

Conclusion: This series of late gastric fundal perforations in<br />

0.2% of patients after laparoscopic fundoplication could potentially<br />

have been caused by celecoxib, gastric stasis, ischemia,<br />

or foreign body such as a stitch or pledget. Patients after<br />

laparoscopic fundoplication should be advised to avoid the use<br />

of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which may cause<br />

acute gastric ulceration with perforation.<br />

P231–Complications of Surgery<br />

PANCREATIC COMPLICATIONS AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC<br />

SPLENECTOMY, Kotaro Kitani MD, Masataka Ikeda<br />

PhD,Mitsugu Sekimoto PhD,Masayuki Ohue PhD,Hirofumi<br />

Yamamoto PhD,Masakazu Ikenaga PhD,Ichiro Takemasa<br />

PhD,Shuji Takiguchi MD,Masayoshi Yasui MD,Taishi Hata<br />

MD,Tatsushi Shingai MD,Morito Monden PhD, Department of<br />

Surgery and Clinical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine,<br />

Osaka University<br />

Background: Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has been accepted<br />

as a standard operational procedure for hematological diseases.<br />

Pancreatic complication is one of major complications<br />

associated with this procedure. We reviewed pancreatic complications<br />

following LS to find out the incidence of pancreatic<br />

injury and its impact on postoperative management.<br />

Methods: Case log analysis of hospital charts were reviewed.<br />

85 patients in a variety of hematological disorders underwent<br />

LS (including Hand-Assisted LS) between May 1996 and March<br />

2004. We selected to perform Hand-Assisted LS (HALS) for<br />

186 http://www.sages.org/<br />

patients with splenomegaly. We measured postoperative<br />

serum amylase level (S-AMY) and amylase concentration of<br />

peritoneal fluid (D-AMY). Pancreatic fistula was defined as<br />

infected drainage with high D-AMY<br />

Results: Two patients (2.4%) had pancreatic fistula and one<br />

patient had concomitant pancreatitis. Their D-AMY was<br />

extremely high level (66600 and 4458 IU/L), while their S-AMY<br />

was almost within normal range (91 and 171). Their surgical<br />

drains were removed on 15 and 8 postoperative days, respectively.<br />

For the rest of other patients, drains were removed<br />

within three days of operation. In the first patient, HALS was<br />

employed, and operative time was 245 and 315 minutes, blood<br />

loss was 100 and 120ml, resected splenic weight was 2315 and<br />

1100g, respectively. Fifteen patients (20%) had asymptomatic<br />

hyperamylasemia, and recovered uneventfully. Eleven patients<br />

(11%) developed high D-AMY level without any symptoms.<br />

Mean splenic weight of these patients was 654g and statistical<br />

analysis showed a significant relationship between D-AMY and<br />

resected splenic weight.<br />

Conclusions: We report two cases of postoperative pancreatic<br />

fistula which required long drainage. Patients with<br />

splenomegaly need special attention for postoperative pancreatic<br />

complications.<br />

P232–Complications of Surgery<br />

PORTAL VEIN THROMBOSIS AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC<br />

SPLENECTOMY FOR SYSTEMIC MASTOCYTOSIS, Majed<br />

Maalouf MD, Daniel Gagné MD,Pavlos Papasavas MD,David<br />

Goitein MD,Philip Caushaj MD, The Western Pennsylvania<br />

Hospital, Temple University Medical School Clinical Campus<br />

Laparoscopic splenectomy has become the surgical technique<br />

of choice for various diseases of the spleen. Portal vein thrombosis<br />

(PVT) following splenectomy occurs in 0.5-22% of<br />

patients. Symptoms are non-specific and include fever,<br />

abdominal pain, and epigastric distress. Risk factors for PVT<br />

following splenectomy include underlying hematological disorders,<br />

massive splenomegaly (>1kg), thrombocytosis (>106)<br />

and other hypercoagulable states.<br />

We describe a case of PVT in a woman who underwent laparoscopic<br />

splenectomy for symptomatic splenomegaly secondary<br />

to systemic mastocytosis. The patient was discharged from the<br />

hospital without anticoagulation and experienced nonspecific<br />

symptoms beginning 10 days postoperatively. Diagnosis of<br />

PVT was made by contrast enhanced abdominal computed<br />

tomography. The patient had no underlying risk factors.<br />

Anticoagulation treatment facilitated recanalization of the portal<br />

vein and this was verified by Doppler ultrasound at followup.<br />

PVT following laparoscopic splenectomy is not uncommon.<br />

Signs and symptoms are vague and require a high index of<br />

suspicion for timely diagnosis. Anticoagulation is the treatment<br />

of choice and allows recanalization of the portal system<br />

in the majority of cases.<br />

P233–Complications of Surgery<br />

DOES LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY INCREASE THE RISK<br />

OF INTRAABDOMINAL ABSCESS, J M Saxe MD, D Tong MD,K<br />

Kralovich, Henry Ford Hospital<br />

The laparoscopic approach to appendectomy has been gaining<br />

in popularity. Some reports have indicated however an<br />

increased incidence of post operative abscess formation in<br />

complex appendicitis treated by laparoscopy.<br />

Recommendations have favored open procedures when<br />

abscess was known preoperatively. Perforation and infected<br />

fluid is not always able to be determined preoperatively. Our<br />

hypothesis is that postoperative intra-abdominal abscess formation<br />

is not higher after laparoscopic appendectomy when<br />

compared to open appendectomy for appendicitis.<br />

Methods: A retrospective study of all patients who underwent<br />

an appendectomy at our single institution between January<br />

2002 and March 2003. Exclusion criteria included patients<br />

under 18 years of age and incidental appendectomy. Charts<br />

were reviewed for age, gender, intraoperative diagnosis, operative<br />

procedure, postoperative complications, and length of<br />

stay. Operations were classified as laparoscopic(LA), lap. converted<br />

to open (CO), and open appendectomy (OA). Diagnosis<br />

was classified as normal, acute appendicitis, gangrenous and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!