2005 SAGES Abstracts
2005 SAGES Abstracts
2005 SAGES Abstracts
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
POSTER ABSTRACTS<br />
<strong>SAGES</strong> <strong>2005</strong><br />
tive LC. Of the 97 pts with an initial negative US 13 pts (13.4%)<br />
developed symptomatic cholelithiasis and underwent subsequent<br />
LC after a median follow-up period of 48.5 months. The<br />
mean delay period from the LGPB to LC was 14 months. In<br />
Group II (n=73; median follow-up=28.5 months) 17 pts were<br />
identified with cholelithiasis preoperatively, of whom 3 pts<br />
(17.6%) developed symptomatic disease requiring LC after a<br />
mean delay of 21 months. Of the pts with negative US (n=56) 7<br />
pts (12.5%) developed symptomatic disease requiring LC<br />
(mean delay = 17 months). The two ratios are not significantly<br />
different with 95% confidence (CI=-16.86 to 27.06). None of the<br />
interval cholecystectomies had any complications and one pt<br />
underwent successful lap common bile duct exploration.<br />
Simultaneous LC coincident with laparoscopic bariatric surgery<br />
can be difficult due to trocar positioning and anatomic<br />
constraints. Patients with or without preoperative evidence of<br />
cholelithiasis can be followed clinically for the development of<br />
symptomatic gallstone disease. LC can be performed safely at<br />
a later time in this population should symptoms arise.<br />
P089–Bariatric Surgery<br />
AVOIDING OBSTRUCTION AT THE JEJUNO-JEJUNOSTOMY<br />
DURING LAPAROSCOPIC GASTRIC BYPASS, Rebecca Shore<br />
MD, Scott Shikora MD,Julie Kim MD,Michael Tarnoff MD,<br />
Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, TUFTS-New England<br />
Medical Center<br />
Introduction: Laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGB) is rapidly<br />
gaining popularity in the treatment of morbid obesity in the<br />
United States. Many technical variations of the operation currently<br />
exist. Commonly a side to side anastomosis is created<br />
between the bilio-pancreatic limb and the roux limb with a<br />
60mm Endo GIA (USSC, Norwalk, CT). The entry site for the<br />
stapler must then be closed. Initially, we closed this opening<br />
linearly, along the length of the jejuno-jejunostomy (JJ), with<br />
this technique we encountered a 4.8% JJ obstruction rate.<br />
Subsequently, we changed our technique in an attempt to<br />
decrease this troubling complication. This abstract describes a<br />
bi-directional stapled JJ to assure a wide opening between the<br />
two limbs.<br />
Method: After the 60mm Endo GIA is used to create the side to<br />
side anastomosis a 30 mm Endo GIA is positioned in the<br />
opposite direction and fired creating a 90mm anastomosis.<br />
The opening is then closed transversely similar to the Heineke-<br />
Mikulicz pyloroplasty with a single firing of the 60 mm Endo<br />
GIA. The stapled jejunal specimen is removed and inspected<br />
to assure continuity of the serosal layer. We then close the<br />
mesenteric defect with a running suture and incorporate an<br />
anti-obstruction stitch.<br />
Results: A review of our institution?s data reveals that with the<br />
unidirectional closure we had a 4.8% anastomotic obstruction<br />
rate (6/125 cases). Four of these six patients required operative<br />
intervention. Since implementing the bi-directional anastomosis<br />
our obstruction rate is 0% (0/733 cases).<br />
Conclusion: Bi-directional stapling of the JJ results in a wide<br />
opening, is technically feasible and decreases the incidence of<br />
obstruction.<br />
P090–Bariatric Surgery<br />
A NEW DEVICE BY USING OMENTUM FOR PREVENTING<br />
COMPLICATIONS DURING LAPAROSCOPIC ROUX-EN-Y GAS-<br />
TRIC BYPASS FOR MORBID OBESITY, Nobumi Tagaya PhD,<br />
Kazunori Kasama MD,Yasuharu Kakihara MD,Shoujirou<br />
Taketsuka MD,Kenji Horie MD,Norio Suzuki MD,Keiichi Kubota<br />
PhD, 1) Department of Surgery, Horie Hospital, Gunma, Japan,<br />
2) Second Department of Surgery, Dokkyo University School of<br />
Medicine, Tochigi, Japan<br />
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has emerged as a standard<br />
surgical treatment for morbid obesity. However, the prevention<br />
of postoperative complications related with bariatric<br />
surgery is necessary. To reduce postoperative complications<br />
and achieve the adequate body weight loss, we introduce a<br />
new device using separated omentum during laparoscopic<br />
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The actual aim of these devices is to<br />
prevent the gastro-gastric fistula due to the re-entry of alimentary<br />
tract and the leakage from gastric pouch or anastomosis.<br />
Between February 2002 and August 2004 we have performed<br />
laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity in<br />
148 http://www.sages.org/<br />
21 cases. Recent 8 cases were introduced our new device<br />
using separated omentum. They were one male and seven<br />
females. Their mean age was 33 years old (range, 18-50), and<br />
mean BMI was 40 Kg/m2 (range, 34-46). At surgery, omentum<br />
is routinely separated using laparoscopic coagulating shares<br />
before performing gastro-jejunostomy to reduce the tension of<br />
anastomosis. After performing hand-sewn gastro-jejunostomy,<br />
a left side of separated omentum is moved cranially and interposed<br />
between a gastric pouch and a residual stomach. And<br />
then omentum was sutured to the posterior aspect of the gastric<br />
pouch, or the gastric pouch was rapped by omentum circumferentially.<br />
Our procedure using omentum during bariatric<br />
surgery is feasible and safe to obtain better outcomes without<br />
artificial materials. Although the long-term outcome of this<br />
technique is still unclear, we believe that this technique will<br />
provide to decrease the particular complications related with<br />
laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity.<br />
P091–Bariatric Surgery<br />
GASTRIC BYPASS IN PATIENTS 55 YEARS AND OLDER: A<br />
COMPARISON OF YOUNG VS OLD AND THE LAPAROSCOPIC<br />
VS OPEN TECHNIQUE, Mark Takata MD, Suhail Shaikh<br />
MD,Bruce Bernstein PhD,Martindale Carolyn RN,Manuel<br />
Lorenzo MD,Richard Newman MD,Carlos Barba MD,<br />
Department of Surgery, St. Francis Hospital and Medical<br />
Center, University of Connecticut School of Medicine<br />
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy<br />
of Roux-en Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery for morbid obesity<br />
between patients 55 years and older with patients younger<br />
than 55 years and to evaluate whether or not the laparoscopic<br />
approach provides a better outcome in the older age group.<br />
A retrospective chart review was conducted at a single tertiary<br />
care institution. Morbidly obese patients 55 years and over<br />
were included if they underwent laparoscopic (lap) or open<br />
RYGB surgery between January 1999 and March 2004. A random<br />
sample of 122 patients were selected from a total of 494<br />
patients younger than 55 who had lap or open RYGB during<br />
the same study period. Demographics, preoperative body<br />
mass index (BMI), comorbidities, length of stay (LOS), perioperative<br />
complications, and percent weight loss were compared<br />
between the two age groups.<br />
A total of 61 consecutive patients 55 years and over underwent<br />
RYGB surgery during the study period. There were no significant<br />
differences between the two age groups with respect to<br />
gender, preoperative BMI, LOS, and percent weight loss at 3,<br />
6, and 12 months. When comparing comorbidities (young vs<br />
old), there were significant differences (p < 0.05) in the prevalence<br />
of coronary artery disease (3.3 vs 13.1%), diabetes mellitus<br />
(20.7 vs 39.3%), and hypertension (39.8 vs 77.0%). There<br />
were no significant differences between the prevalence of<br />
COPD and sleep apnea. There were two perioperative mortalities<br />
in the younger group and one in the older group. When<br />
comparing perioperative complications between the two age<br />
groups (young vs old) there were no significant differences in<br />
the rates of cardiopulmonary complications (1.6 vs 6.6%),<br />
anastomotic leaks (4.1 vs 4.9%), postoperative bleeding (0 vs<br />
3.3%), and wound infections (15.0 vs 18.0%). The lap approach<br />
was utilized in 49.2% of the younger group and 29.5% of the<br />
older group (p < 0.05). When comparing the lap and open<br />
approach in the older age group there were no significant differences<br />
in demographics (except BMI), LOS, and perioperative<br />
complications.<br />
Despite the higher rate of comorbidities in the older age<br />
group, this study demonstrates that RYGB surgery for morbid<br />
obesity in properly selected patients age 55 years and over<br />
can safely and efficaciously be performed when compared to<br />
younger patients. In addition, the lap approach in patients 55<br />
and over does not result in a shorter LOS or less perioperative<br />
complications.<br />
P092–Bariatric Surgery<br />
LAPAROSCOPIC ADJUSTABLE GASTRIC BANDING: RESULTS<br />
OF THE FIRST 500 CASES USING THE PARS FLACCIDA TECH-<br />
NIQUE., craig J taylor MD, Laurent Layani MD, Gold Coast<br />
Obesity Surgery Centre, Gold Coast Queensland Australia<br />
INTRODUCTION. Whilst the Pars Flaccida technique of LAGB<br />
placement has been shown by experienced bariatric surgeons