02.06.2015 Views

2005 SAGES Abstracts

2005 SAGES Abstracts

2005 SAGES Abstracts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

POSTER ABSTRACTS<br />

laparoscopic equipment with very reduced diameter, which<br />

has led to “state of the art” of 2mm instruments, also known<br />

as mini or needle instruments.<br />

OBJECTIVE: To present modifications to mini-laparascopic<br />

technique which may make it possible to conduct minilaparascopic<br />

procedures safely and effectively, thereby reducing<br />

considerably the cost of this type of surgery.<br />

PATIENTS: Patients suffering from chronic lithiasic cholecystitis<br />

at various stages of the disease were submitted to procedures<br />

fully performed by mini-laparascopy, including acute<br />

cholecystitis and per-operative cholangiography.<br />

METHOD: After performing the pneumoperitoneum in the<br />

umbilical site, four trocars are inserted; two of 2mm (support<br />

trocars), one of 3mm (work trocar) and one of 10mm, through<br />

which a 10 mm 30 degrees laparoscope is inserted. Neither<br />

the 3mm laparoscope nor clips are used, the cystic artery is<br />

safely sealed by eletrocautery, near the gallbladder and the<br />

cystic duct is sealed with surgical knots. Removal of the gallbladder<br />

is carried out, in a bag made with a glove wrist,<br />

through the 10mm umbilical site.<br />

CONCLUSION: Mini-laparascopic cholecystectomy is a safe<br />

and effective procedure which results in a better esthetic effect<br />

for the patients, when compared to conventional laparascopy.<br />

The technique described above allows a considerable reduction<br />

in the costs associated with the original mini-laparascopic<br />

procedure, since neither clips, endobags, nor mini-loops are<br />

used. Neither is any use made of 3mm laparoscope which is<br />

the most expensive component among mini-laparascopic<br />

instruments.<br />

P188–Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic<br />

Surgery<br />

LAPAROSCOPIC CBD EXPLORATION WITHOUT T-TUBE, In<br />

Seok Choi PhD, Ji Hoon Park MD,Won Jun Choi PhD,Dae<br />

Gyoung Go MD,Dae Sung Yoon MD, Dept. of Surgery,<br />

Konyang University Hospital, Konyang University College of<br />

medicine, Daejeon, Korea<br />

(Objective) Laparoscopic common bile duct<br />

exploration(LCBDE) is feasible and becoming popular. LCBDE<br />

has traditionally been accompanied by T-tube drainage which<br />

has a 4.7-17.5% morbidity rate and increases hospital stay.<br />

Avoidance of T-tube drainage therefore should advantageously<br />

contribute to the ideal approach for LCBDE. The authors report<br />

a prospective evaluation of LCBDE without T-tube drainage.<br />

(Methods and Procedures) Between March 2001 and August<br />

2004, 30 patients with common bile duct(CBD) stones underwent<br />

this approach. We adopted internal endobiliary stent in<br />

11 patients and performed primary closure for choledochotomy.<br />

Other 19 patients who had external drainage such as,<br />

endoscopic nasobiliary drain(ENBD), percutaneous transhepatic<br />

biliary drain(PTBD), were treated by LCBDE with primary<br />

closure.<br />

(Results) Open conversion, because of impacted large CBD<br />

stones, was 1 case (3.5%). The mean operative time of LCBDE<br />

was 134 minutes, postoperative hospital stay was 8.5 days.<br />

Complication rate was 13.8%( 4/30 cases, 2 cases : migration<br />

of endobiliary stent in CBD, 1case : subhepatic biloma, 1case:<br />

retained stone) and no mortality. The rate of successful stone<br />

removal was 96.6%. Biliary stents were eliminated spontaneously<br />

via the gastrointestinal tract among 4 patients, and for<br />

6 patients, the stents had to be removed endoscopically. The<br />

other 1 patient underwent laparotomy for stent removal.<br />

(Conclusions) LCBDE without T-tube was safe and feasible<br />

technique. Further study and assessment of internal biliary<br />

stent should be warranted.<br />

P189–Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic<br />

Surgery<br />

LAPAROSCOPIC LIVER RESECTION IN PORCINE: DEVELOP-<br />

MENT OF AN EXPERIMENTAL MODEL, Alex Escalona MD,<br />

Felipe Bellolio MD,Nicolás Jarufe MD,Luis Ibáñez MD,Gustavo<br />

Pérez MD,Matías Guajardo MS, Pontificia Universidad Católica<br />

de Chile<br />

Introduction: The development of the laparoscopic surgery has<br />

permitted to incorporate this technology to the surgical treatment<br />

of different pathologies. The left lateral segmentectomy<br />

(LLS) (segments II and III of Couinaud) is the more frequently<br />

carried out laparoscopic liver resection. The objective of this<br />

study is to evaluate the feasibility to carry out laparoscopic<br />

LLS in porcine model and to compare the results with the<br />

open technique. Material and Methods: Ten animals of similar<br />

age, weight and size were undergone to LLS. In 4 cases the<br />

procedure was performed by open technique (group 1) and in<br />

6 cases by laparoscopy (group 2). The operative time, bleeding<br />

and weight of the resected liver segment was registered in a<br />

prospective database. Autopsy was carried out at seventh<br />

postoperative day. Results: The operative time was 77 ± 19<br />

minutes in the group 1 and 52 ± 38 minutes in the group 2 (p =<br />

0,21). Intraoperative bleeding was of 185 ± 67 and 70 ± 52 ml.<br />

in the group 1 and 2 respectively (p = 0,01). The weight of the<br />

extracted segment was of 128 ± 27 and of 128 ± 16 grams in<br />

groups 1 and 2 respectively (p = NS). One animal operated by<br />

open technique presented a wound infection. There were no<br />

other complications or deaths. Conclusions: Laparoscopic LLS<br />

in porcine model is a feasible procedure. In this series a less<br />

intraoperative bleeding was observed in the animals operated<br />

by laparoscopic technique. The operative time and weight of<br />

the specimen is comparable in both techniques. The implementation<br />

of this procedure in an animal model could be useful<br />

in the development of research, acquisition of laparoscopic<br />

skills in liver surgery and implementation of the technique in<br />

humans.<br />

P190–Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic<br />

Surgery<br />

IMPROVEMENT IN GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOMS AND<br />

QUALITY OF LIFE FOLLOWING CHOLECYSTECTOMY, Kelly R<br />

Finan MD, Leeth R Ruth MPH,Brian M Whitley MPH,Joshua C<br />

Klapow PhD,Mary T Hawn MD, University of Alabama at<br />

Birmingham<br />

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the accepted<br />

treatment for symptomatic gallstone disease, but has been<br />

criticized as an over-utilized procedure. The aim of this study is<br />

to assess the effectiveness of LC on reduction of specific gastrointestinal<br />

(GI) symptoms and the impact on quality of life<br />

(QOL). Methods: A prospective cohort of consecutive subjects<br />

evaluated for gallstone disease between 8/2001 and 7/2004<br />

were given the SF-36 QOL survey and a gallbladder symptom<br />

survey. The latter was developed to assess symptom frequency,<br />

severity and distressfulness for 16 related GI symptoms.<br />

Postoperative surveys were sent to all subjects who underwent<br />

LC. A chart abstraction was performed to collect demographic<br />

information and operative details. The surveys were<br />

scored and evaluated using paired t-tests. Results: 100 patients<br />

were mailed postoperative surveys with a 61% response rate<br />

at a mean follow up of 17.5 months (2-31). Preoperative indications<br />

were biliary colic (64%), cholecystitis (15%), biliary pancreatitis/cholodocholithiasis<br />

(11%) and biliary dyskinesia (8%).<br />

Preoperative QOL scores measured by the SF-36 were significantly<br />

below normative values in 6 of 8 categories (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!