2005 SAGES Abstracts
2005 SAGES Abstracts
2005 SAGES Abstracts
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
POSTER ABSTRACTS<br />
laparoscopic equipment with very reduced diameter, which<br />
has led to “state of the art” of 2mm instruments, also known<br />
as mini or needle instruments.<br />
OBJECTIVE: To present modifications to mini-laparascopic<br />
technique which may make it possible to conduct minilaparascopic<br />
procedures safely and effectively, thereby reducing<br />
considerably the cost of this type of surgery.<br />
PATIENTS: Patients suffering from chronic lithiasic cholecystitis<br />
at various stages of the disease were submitted to procedures<br />
fully performed by mini-laparascopy, including acute<br />
cholecystitis and per-operative cholangiography.<br />
METHOD: After performing the pneumoperitoneum in the<br />
umbilical site, four trocars are inserted; two of 2mm (support<br />
trocars), one of 3mm (work trocar) and one of 10mm, through<br />
which a 10 mm 30 degrees laparoscope is inserted. Neither<br />
the 3mm laparoscope nor clips are used, the cystic artery is<br />
safely sealed by eletrocautery, near the gallbladder and the<br />
cystic duct is sealed with surgical knots. Removal of the gallbladder<br />
is carried out, in a bag made with a glove wrist,<br />
through the 10mm umbilical site.<br />
CONCLUSION: Mini-laparascopic cholecystectomy is a safe<br />
and effective procedure which results in a better esthetic effect<br />
for the patients, when compared to conventional laparascopy.<br />
The technique described above allows a considerable reduction<br />
in the costs associated with the original mini-laparascopic<br />
procedure, since neither clips, endobags, nor mini-loops are<br />
used. Neither is any use made of 3mm laparoscope which is<br />
the most expensive component among mini-laparascopic<br />
instruments.<br />
P188–Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic<br />
Surgery<br />
LAPAROSCOPIC CBD EXPLORATION WITHOUT T-TUBE, In<br />
Seok Choi PhD, Ji Hoon Park MD,Won Jun Choi PhD,Dae<br />
Gyoung Go MD,Dae Sung Yoon MD, Dept. of Surgery,<br />
Konyang University Hospital, Konyang University College of<br />
medicine, Daejeon, Korea<br />
(Objective) Laparoscopic common bile duct<br />
exploration(LCBDE) is feasible and becoming popular. LCBDE<br />
has traditionally been accompanied by T-tube drainage which<br />
has a 4.7-17.5% morbidity rate and increases hospital stay.<br />
Avoidance of T-tube drainage therefore should advantageously<br />
contribute to the ideal approach for LCBDE. The authors report<br />
a prospective evaluation of LCBDE without T-tube drainage.<br />
(Methods and Procedures) Between March 2001 and August<br />
2004, 30 patients with common bile duct(CBD) stones underwent<br />
this approach. We adopted internal endobiliary stent in<br />
11 patients and performed primary closure for choledochotomy.<br />
Other 19 patients who had external drainage such as,<br />
endoscopic nasobiliary drain(ENBD), percutaneous transhepatic<br />
biliary drain(PTBD), were treated by LCBDE with primary<br />
closure.<br />
(Results) Open conversion, because of impacted large CBD<br />
stones, was 1 case (3.5%). The mean operative time of LCBDE<br />
was 134 minutes, postoperative hospital stay was 8.5 days.<br />
Complication rate was 13.8%( 4/30 cases, 2 cases : migration<br />
of endobiliary stent in CBD, 1case : subhepatic biloma, 1case:<br />
retained stone) and no mortality. The rate of successful stone<br />
removal was 96.6%. Biliary stents were eliminated spontaneously<br />
via the gastrointestinal tract among 4 patients, and for<br />
6 patients, the stents had to be removed endoscopically. The<br />
other 1 patient underwent laparotomy for stent removal.<br />
(Conclusions) LCBDE without T-tube was safe and feasible<br />
technique. Further study and assessment of internal biliary<br />
stent should be warranted.<br />
P189–Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic<br />
Surgery<br />
LAPAROSCOPIC LIVER RESECTION IN PORCINE: DEVELOP-<br />
MENT OF AN EXPERIMENTAL MODEL, Alex Escalona MD,<br />
Felipe Bellolio MD,Nicolás Jarufe MD,Luis Ibáñez MD,Gustavo<br />
Pérez MD,Matías Guajardo MS, Pontificia Universidad Católica<br />
de Chile<br />
Introduction: The development of the laparoscopic surgery has<br />
permitted to incorporate this technology to the surgical treatment<br />
of different pathologies. The left lateral segmentectomy<br />
(LLS) (segments II and III of Couinaud) is the more frequently<br />
carried out laparoscopic liver resection. The objective of this<br />
study is to evaluate the feasibility to carry out laparoscopic<br />
LLS in porcine model and to compare the results with the<br />
open technique. Material and Methods: Ten animals of similar<br />
age, weight and size were undergone to LLS. In 4 cases the<br />
procedure was performed by open technique (group 1) and in<br />
6 cases by laparoscopy (group 2). The operative time, bleeding<br />
and weight of the resected liver segment was registered in a<br />
prospective database. Autopsy was carried out at seventh<br />
postoperative day. Results: The operative time was 77 ± 19<br />
minutes in the group 1 and 52 ± 38 minutes in the group 2 (p =<br />
0,21). Intraoperative bleeding was of 185 ± 67 and 70 ± 52 ml.<br />
in the group 1 and 2 respectively (p = 0,01). The weight of the<br />
extracted segment was of 128 ± 27 and of 128 ± 16 grams in<br />
groups 1 and 2 respectively (p = NS). One animal operated by<br />
open technique presented a wound infection. There were no<br />
other complications or deaths. Conclusions: Laparoscopic LLS<br />
in porcine model is a feasible procedure. In this series a less<br />
intraoperative bleeding was observed in the animals operated<br />
by laparoscopic technique. The operative time and weight of<br />
the specimen is comparable in both techniques. The implementation<br />
of this procedure in an animal model could be useful<br />
in the development of research, acquisition of laparoscopic<br />
skills in liver surgery and implementation of the technique in<br />
humans.<br />
P190–Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic<br />
Surgery<br />
IMPROVEMENT IN GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOMS AND<br />
QUALITY OF LIFE FOLLOWING CHOLECYSTECTOMY, Kelly R<br />
Finan MD, Leeth R Ruth MPH,Brian M Whitley MPH,Joshua C<br />
Klapow PhD,Mary T Hawn MD, University of Alabama at<br />
Birmingham<br />
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the accepted<br />
treatment for symptomatic gallstone disease, but has been<br />
criticized as an over-utilized procedure. The aim of this study is<br />
to assess the effectiveness of LC on reduction of specific gastrointestinal<br />
(GI) symptoms and the impact on quality of life<br />
(QOL). Methods: A prospective cohort of consecutive subjects<br />
evaluated for gallstone disease between 8/2001 and 7/2004<br />
were given the SF-36 QOL survey and a gallbladder symptom<br />
survey. The latter was developed to assess symptom frequency,<br />
severity and distressfulness for 16 related GI symptoms.<br />
Postoperative surveys were sent to all subjects who underwent<br />
LC. A chart abstraction was performed to collect demographic<br />
information and operative details. The surveys were<br />
scored and evaluated using paired t-tests. Results: 100 patients<br />
were mailed postoperative surveys with a 61% response rate<br />
at a mean follow up of 17.5 months (2-31). Preoperative indications<br />
were biliary colic (64%), cholecystitis (15%), biliary pancreatitis/cholodocholithiasis<br />
(11%) and biliary dyskinesia (8%).<br />
Preoperative QOL scores measured by the SF-36 were significantly<br />
below normative values in 6 of 8 categories (p