Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): Arabic - Vacau

More documents

Recommendations

Info

O.1.5. Extraction of correct number of factors (See Glorfeld, 1995, for a review of these methods) A. Highly Likely Cross-validation on two samples, use of scree plot, eigenvalue > 1 or other more conservative rules used. Factors extracted produce interpretable scales. B. Likely Use of scree plot, eigenvalue > 1 or other more conservative rules used, and factors extracted produce interpretable scales. C. Unlikely Eigenvalue > 1 rule used, and scales not interpretable D. NR No decision rules made explicit O.1.6. Variance accounted for by all the factors (post-rotation) A. Very good : > 70 per cent. B. OK : > 50 per cent. C. Marginal : > 40 per cent. D. Poor : < 40 per cent. NR. Variance accounted for not reported. Note: If a single factor extracted and the scale is uni-dimensional, >30 per cent is acceptable). Note that post-rotation variance cannot be determined for oblique rotation and in this instance, as with principal components analysis, pre-rotation variance is used. Almost no study made explicit if the variance explained was pre- or post-rotation and therefore the variance explained was often used in the absence of explicit detail. O.1.7. Items load on expected factors or pattern of loadings make theoretical sense. A. Acceptable : Loadings >.30. B. Marginal : Most loadings >.30, one or two .30. B. Marginal : One or two cross-loadings >.30. C. Unacceptable : Several cross-loadings >.30. NR. Factor loadings not reported. 68
O.1.9. Overall evaluation of EFA solution A. Excellent factor extraction rated as “A”; variance accounted for as “A” ; loadings rated as “A”; cross-loadings rated as “A”. B. Good three studies rated “A” and one study rated “B” from the following: factor extraction rated “A”/”B”; variance accounted for “A”/”B”; loadings “A”/”B”; cross-loadings “A”/”B”. C. Marginal factor extraction “A”/”B”; variance accounted for “A”/”B”; loadings “A”/”B”; cross-loadings “A”/”B”. D. NOT ACCEPTABLE factor extraction “B” or less; variance accounted for “B” or less; loadings “B” or less; cross-loadings “B” or less. O.2. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) The following rating system was derived from Rick et al (2000). O.2.1. Use of CFA A. Very Appropriate Prior EFAs conducted on scales with independent samples or strong a priori structure. B. Appropriate Prior EFAs conducted on scales or strong a priori structure. C. Not Appropriate Neither prior EFAs conducted with scales nor strong a priori structure. O.2.2. Sample size A. Very Size > 1,000 Good B. Good Size > 20 times the number of items in a scale or 400. C. OK Size > 10 times the number of items in a scale or 200. D. Minimum Size > 4 times the number items in an instrument or 200, whichever is the greater. E. Unacceptable Size < 4 times number of an instrument or < 200. C. NR Not reported O.2.3. Covariance matrix A. : Analysis on covariance matrix. B. : Analysis on correlation matrix. NR. : Matrix used in analysis not reported. 69
Page 1 and 2:
A CLINICIAN’S COMPENDIUM OF ASSES
Page 3 and 4:
GENERAL HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE (GHQ)
Page 5 and 6:
The most noteworthy finding from th
Page 7 and 8:
learning English and may lack suppo
Page 9 and 10:
CHAPTER TWO PROJECT BACKGROUND AND
Page 11 and 12:
• Impulse control disorders • M
Page 13 and 14:
Sample size of at least 100 or a ra
Page 15 and 16:
CHAPTER THREE SUMMARY OF INSTRUMENT
Page 17 and 18: Factor Analysis: A statistical proc
Page 19 and 20: symptom items that focus on the imp
Page 21 and 22: Bibliography Fawzi, M. C. S., Murph
Page 23 and 24: from 0 to 3 with varying response a
Page 25 and 26: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Sca
Page 27 and 28: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Sca
Page 29 and 30: PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES • Constru
Page 31 and 32: Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-I
Page 33 and 34: Beck Depression Inventory - II (BDI
Page 35 and 36: Bibliography Chan, D. W. (1991). Th
Page 37 and 38: Bibliography Bonicatto, S., Dew, A.
Page 39 and 40: ADMINISTRATION: • Method: Paper-p
Page 41 and 42: General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)
Page 43 and 44: General Health Questionnaire (GHQ):
Page 45 and 46: General Health Questionnaire-30: It
Page 47 and 48: General Health Questionnaire-12: It
Page 49 and 50: Lattanzi, M., Galavn, U., Rizzetto,
Page 51 and 52: Bibliography Chan, D. W. (1983). Re
Page 53 and 54: • Acceptance: Australian users of
Page 55 and 56: Lee, D. T. S., Yip, A. S. K., Chan,
Page 57 and 58: Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scal
Page 59 and 60: G. SUITABILITY: TRAINING • None
Page 61 and 62: • translations methodology is app
Page 63 and 64: • Reliability: Test-retest reliab
Page 65 and 66: The validity of an instrument refer
Page 67: O.1.2. Sample size A. Very Good Siz
Page 71 and 72: Where CFA data for an individual in
Page 73 and 74: The following criteria are derived
Page 75 and 76: section U and V. The rating system
Page 77 and 78: 1. Excellent Sensitivity and specif
Page 79 and 80: Rey, J., Morris-Yates, A., Stanisla
Page 81 and 82: INSTRUMENT 81 No No A.Cultural sens
Page 83 and 84: INSTRUMENT 83 No No No A.Cultural s
Page 87 and 88: INSTRUMENT 87 Not used in Australia
Page 89 and 90: INSTRUMENT 89 No Yes No A.Cultural
Page 93 and 94: INSTRUMENT 93 Yes. Perth Self-ratin
Page 95 and 96: INSTRUMENT 95 No No No A.Cultural s
Page 97: INSTRUMENT 97 A.Cultural sensitivit
show all

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): Arabic - Vacau

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?