03.06.2015 Views

International Reactor Dosimetry File 2002 - IAEA Publications

International Reactor Dosimetry File 2002 - IAEA Publications

International Reactor Dosimetry File 2002 - IAEA Publications

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

— 10 B(n,α) 7 Li and 6 Li(n,t) 4 He: The uncertainty of the library crosssections<br />

in the intermediate neutron energy region is too small (not<br />

realistic) compared with the corresponding C/E values (or the<br />

library data deviate significantly from the experimental values).<br />

— 23 Na(n,γ) 24 Na: The uncertainty information contains only a diagonal<br />

matrix — a new evaluation is required.<br />

— 55 Mn(n,γ) 56 Mn: The C/E value for the resonance integral deviates by<br />

16% from unity — excessive when compared with the related<br />

uncertainty values; a new cross-section evaluation is needed in the<br />

intermediate neutron energy region.<br />

— 58 Fe(n,γ) 59 Fe: The C/E value for the resonance integral with the<br />

Mughabghab data deviates by 19% from unity. A large difference is<br />

also found between the recommended experimental data for the<br />

sources considered. Clarification of this discrepancy is necessary<br />

because this reaction is one of the most frequently used detectors in<br />

reactor dosimetry. A new cross-section evaluation in the intermediate<br />

neutron energy region should also be considered.<br />

— 93 Nb(n,γ) 94 Nb: The C/E value for the resonance integral deviates by<br />

17% from unity; furthermore, the uncertainty information contains<br />

only a diagonal matrix — a new evaluation is required.<br />

— 109 Ag(n,γ) 110 Ag m : Mughabghab data represent the sum of the<br />

reaction cross-sections leading to 110 Ag m+g , while the evaluated data<br />

libraries contain only cross-section data for the 109 Ag(n,γ) 110 Ag m<br />

reaction. Therefore, no comparison with the Mughabghab data was<br />

possible.<br />

— 115 In(n,γ) 116 In m : In the present library the cross-section leading to the<br />

metastable states of the product nucleus 116 In is given; uncertainty<br />

information contains only a diagonal matrix — a new evaluation is<br />

required.<br />

— 181 Ta(n,γ) 182 Ta: The uncertainty information contains only a diagonal<br />

matrix — a new evaluation is required.<br />

— 197 Au(n,γ) 198 Au: The available uncertainty information for this<br />

reaction is not reliable; similar data have been withdrawn from<br />

ENDF/B-VI. Uncertainty data in IRDF-90 were derived from the<br />

same source — a new evaluation is required.<br />

— 232 Th(n,γ) 233 Th: The uncertainty information below 15 eV is defined<br />

only in terms of a diagonal matrix — a new evaluation is required.<br />

— 235 U(n,f): The uncertainty information has been declared to be<br />

unreliable, and has been withdrawn from ENDF/B-VI. Data in<br />

IRDF-90 have the same origin — a new evaluation is required.<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!