International Reactor Dosimetry File 2002 - IAEA Publications
International Reactor Dosimetry File 2002 - IAEA Publications
International Reactor Dosimetry File 2002 - IAEA Publications
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
52<br />
—Ti(n,x) 48 Sc: Only one data point was available from natural titanium, and<br />
the only evaluated file is from JENDL (which appears to be higher than<br />
the sole data point).<br />
— 48 Ti(n,p) 48 Sc: Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized by<br />
Zolotarev. The available files from the IRDF and RRDF are quite<br />
similar, and both fit the average of the available data (which exhibit<br />
considerable scatter).<br />
— 49 Ti(n,np+pn+d) 48 Ti: Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized<br />
by Zolotarev. Although JENDL and the RRDF are similar, the<br />
RRDF appears to fit the available data better.<br />
— 51 V(n,α) 48 Sc: Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized by<br />
Zolotarev. The RRDF is the only available file, and closely matches the<br />
available data.<br />
— 55 Cr(n,2n) 51 Cr: The IRDF, JENDL and ENDF files are almost identical.<br />
All of the recommended data in these files appear to be slightly higher<br />
than the average of the experimental measurements, although they are a<br />
good fit to the data with the lowest uncertainties.<br />
— 55 Mn(n,γ) 56 Mn: JENDL and the IRDF are essentially identical, and both<br />
fit the data with the lowest uncertainties reasonably well.<br />
— 54 Fe(n,2n) 53 Fe: Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized by<br />
Zolotarev. The only available file from the RRDF is a good fit to the<br />
experimental data, although there is some scatter.<br />
— 54 Fe(n,α) 51 Cr: Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized by<br />
Zolotarev. The only available file from the RRDF is a good fit to the<br />
experimental data.<br />
— 54 Fe(n,p) 54 Mn: Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized by<br />
Zolotarev. Evaluated files are available from the IRDF and JENDL: the<br />
IRDF gives a better fit over the entire energy range, although JENDL<br />
may be closer to the average of the data around 14.7 MeV.<br />
— 56 Fe(n,p) 56 Mn: Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized by<br />
Zolotarev. The RRDF and JEFF files are nearly identical, and both fit the<br />
data reasonably well.<br />
— 58 Fe(n,γ) 59 Fe: No experimental data are available near 14 MeV.<br />
— 59 Co(n,γ) 60 Co: The IRDF contains the only available file, and fits the data<br />
apart from one high data point.<br />
— 59 Co(n,2n) 58 Co: The IRDF contains the only available file, and fits the<br />
average of the data that have significant scatter.<br />
— 59 Co(n,α) 56 Mn: Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized by<br />
Zolotarev. The RRDF contains the only available file, and fits the data<br />
reasonably well.