03.06.2015 Views

International Reactor Dosimetry File 2002 - IAEA Publications

International Reactor Dosimetry File 2002 - IAEA Publications

International Reactor Dosimetry File 2002 - IAEA Publications

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

52<br />

—Ti(n,x) 48 Sc: Only one data point was available from natural titanium, and<br />

the only evaluated file is from JENDL (which appears to be higher than<br />

the sole data point).<br />

— 48 Ti(n,p) 48 Sc: Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized by<br />

Zolotarev. The available files from the IRDF and RRDF are quite<br />

similar, and both fit the average of the available data (which exhibit<br />

considerable scatter).<br />

— 49 Ti(n,np+pn+d) 48 Ti: Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized<br />

by Zolotarev. Although JENDL and the RRDF are similar, the<br />

RRDF appears to fit the available data better.<br />

— 51 V(n,α) 48 Sc: Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized by<br />

Zolotarev. The RRDF is the only available file, and closely matches the<br />

available data.<br />

— 55 Cr(n,2n) 51 Cr: The IRDF, JENDL and ENDF files are almost identical.<br />

All of the recommended data in these files appear to be slightly higher<br />

than the average of the experimental measurements, although they are a<br />

good fit to the data with the lowest uncertainties.<br />

— 55 Mn(n,γ) 56 Mn: JENDL and the IRDF are essentially identical, and both<br />

fit the data with the lowest uncertainties reasonably well.<br />

— 54 Fe(n,2n) 53 Fe: Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized by<br />

Zolotarev. The only available file from the RRDF is a good fit to the<br />

experimental data, although there is some scatter.<br />

— 54 Fe(n,α) 51 Cr: Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized by<br />

Zolotarev. The only available file from the RRDF is a good fit to the<br />

experimental data.<br />

— 54 Fe(n,p) 54 Mn: Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized by<br />

Zolotarev. Evaluated files are available from the IRDF and JENDL: the<br />

IRDF gives a better fit over the entire energy range, although JENDL<br />

may be closer to the average of the data around 14.7 MeV.<br />

— 56 Fe(n,p) 56 Mn: Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized by<br />

Zolotarev. The RRDF and JEFF files are nearly identical, and both fit the<br />

data reasonably well.<br />

— 58 Fe(n,γ) 59 Fe: No experimental data are available near 14 MeV.<br />

— 59 Co(n,γ) 60 Co: The IRDF contains the only available file, and fits the data<br />

apart from one high data point.<br />

— 59 Co(n,2n) 58 Co: The IRDF contains the only available file, and fits the<br />

average of the data that have significant scatter.<br />

— 59 Co(n,α) 56 Mn: Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized by<br />

Zolotarev. The RRDF contains the only available file, and fits the data<br />

reasonably well.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!