TABLE 6.2. CROSS-SECTIONS IN IRDF-<strong>2002</strong> AND THEIR CHARACTERISTICS (TEMPERATURE OF 300 K) (cont.) Reaction Selected evaluation Calculated library crosssection (2200 m/s) σ L (b) Resonance integral from library data IR L (b) Uncertainty in library data Thermal (%) Epithermal (%) Calculated average library crosssection in 252 Uncertainty in Cf (%) a C/E fission (mb) a 241 Am(n,f) JENDL/D-99 3.03 7.84 2.00 1.56 1396 2.81 (2.90) Thermal: 0.99 ± 0.004 b Epithermal: no experimental data No experimental data in 252 Cf fission field Calculated and experimental data for the response of the activation detectors in the neutron field of the 252 Cf spontaneous fission are from Mannhart (see Section 4). a b Evaluated experimental data from Ref. [6.9]. Diagonal matrix. c d Evaluated experimental data from Ref. [6.10]. e Sum of cross-sections of (n,np)+(n,pn)+(n,d) reactions. Metastable state of the product nucleus. g Unreliable uncertainty (corresponding data have been withdrawn from ENDF/B-VI). (u): Updated data. (n): New data. Notes: Column 8 shows the contribution of the energy dependent library cross-section data to the uncertainty of ; values in brackets give the total standard deviation of , including the contribution of the uncertainty of the 252 Cf spectrum function. Uncertainties given for the C/E values involve the standard deviations of both the calculated and experimental cross-section data. All uncertainty data in the table are expressed in terms of one standard deviation. f 69
REFERENCES TO SECTION 6 [6.1] GRIFFIN, P.J., PAVIOTTI-CORCUERA, R. (Eds), Summary Report of the Final Technical Meeting on <strong>International</strong> <strong>Reactor</strong> <strong>Dosimetry</strong> <strong>File</strong>: IRDF-<strong>2002</strong>, Rep. INDC(NDS)-448, <strong>IAEA</strong>, Vienna (2003). [6.2] “Benchmarks and intercomparisons, supplementary workshop on testing of the IRDF-<strong>2002</strong> <strong>File</strong>, workshop session III”, <strong>Reactor</strong> <strong>Dosimetry</strong> in the 21st Century (Proc. 11th Int. Symp. Brussels, <strong>2002</strong>), World Scientific, Singapore (2003) 718–719. [6.3] ZSOLNAY, E.M., NOLTHENIUS, H.J., SZONDI, E.J., Nuclear Data for <strong>Reactor</strong> <strong>Dosimetry</strong> Libraries: Analysis, Intercomparison and Selection of Data, Rep. BME-NTI-251/2001, Institute of Nuclear Techniques, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest (2001). [6.4] ZSOLNAY, E.M., NOLTHENIUS, H.J., SZONDI, E.J., Analysis, Intercomparison and Selection of Data for the Preliminary Version of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Reactor</strong> <strong>Dosimetry</strong> <strong>File</strong> IRDF-<strong>2002</strong>, Rep. BME-NTI-265/<strong>2002</strong>, Institute of Nuclear Techniques, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest (<strong>2002</strong>). [6.5] ZSOLNAY, E.M., NOLTHENIUS, H.J., “Selection of cross sections in the thermal and epithermal neutron energy for the file IRDF-<strong>2002</strong>, and characterization of the selected data”, Summary Report of the Final Technical Meeting on <strong>International</strong> <strong>Reactor</strong> <strong>Dosimetry</strong> <strong>File</strong>: IRDF-<strong>2002</strong> (GRIFFIN, P.J., PAVIOTTI- CORCUERA, R., Eds), Rep. INDC(NDS)-448, <strong>IAEA</strong>, Vienna (2003) 73–83. [6.6] ZSOLNAY, E.M., NOLTHENIUS, H.J., “Selection of fast neutron cross sections for the file IRDF-<strong>2002</strong>, and characterization of the selected data”, ibid., pp. 85–93. [6.7] BAARD, J.H., ZIJP, W.L., NOLTHENIUS, H.J., Nuclear Data Guide for <strong>Reactor</strong> Neutron Metrology, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1989). [6.8] ZOLOTAREV, K.I., Institute of Physics and Power Engineering, Obninsk, personal communication, 2004. [6.9] HOLDEN, N.E., “Neutron scattering and absorption properties (revised 2003)”, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 84th edn (LIDE, D.R., Ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2003) 198–213. [6.10] MUGHABGHAB, S.F., Thermal Neutron Capture Cross Sections, Resonance Integrals and g-factors, Rep. INDC(NDS)-440, <strong>IAEA</strong>, Vienna (2003). 70
- Page 2 and 3:
INTERNATIONAL REACTOR DOSIMETRY FIL
- Page 4 and 5:
TECHNICAL REPORTS SERIES No. 452 IN
- Page 6 and 7:
FOREWORD An accurate and complete k
- Page 9 and 10:
Contributing authors O. Bersillon C
- Page 11 and 12:
5.1. Plots of experimental data and
- Page 14 and 15:
1. INTRODUCTION R. Paviotti-Corcuer
- Page 16 and 17:
(b) (c) Pointwise data: (i) All dos
- Page 18 and 19:
REFERENCES TO SECTION 1 [1.1] ZIJP,
- Page 20 and 21:
cross-sections, and as a consequenc
- Page 22 and 23:
TABLE 2.1. MEASURED AND CALCULATED
- Page 24 and 25:
TABLE 2.2. MEASURED AND CALCULATED
- Page 26 and 27:
[2.24] KOBAYASHI, K., KIMURA, I., M
- Page 28 and 29:
from ENDF/B-VI Release 8, JEFF-3.0
- Page 30 and 31:
TABLE 3.1. REACTIONS FROM THE VARIO
- Page 32 and 33: Fluence rate per unit energy (m -2
- Page 34 and 35: TABLE 3.2. COMPARISON OF THE INTEGR
- Page 36 and 37: — 10 B(n,α) 7 Li and 6 Li(n,t) 4
- Page 38 and 39: TABLE 3.3. THERMAL NEUTRON CROSS-SE
- Page 40 and 41: TABLE 3.4. RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIAT
- Page 42 and 43: [3.14] HOLDEN, N.E., “Neutron sca
- Page 44 and 45: The rigorous inclusion of all uncer
- Page 46 and 47: TABLE 4.1. C/E VALUES IN THE CALIFO
- Page 48 and 49: TABLE 4.3. IRDF-90.2 ( DATA IN A CA
- Page 50 and 51: TABLE 4.3. IRDF-90.2 ( DATA IN A CA
- Page 52 and 53: TABLE 4.4. JENDL/D-99 ( DATA IN A C
- Page 54 and 55: TABLE 4.4. JENDL/D-99 ( DATA IN A C
- Page 56 and 57: TABLE 4.5. UPDATED RRDF-98 ( DATA I
- Page 58 and 59: REFERENCES TO SECTION 4 [4.1] KOCHE
- Page 60 and 61: neutron yield substantially. Furthe
- Page 62 and 63: TABLE 5.1. CROSS-SECTION EVALUATION
- Page 64 and 65: TABLE 5.1. CROSS-SECTION EVALUATION
- Page 66 and 67: — 58 Ni(n,2n) 57 Ni: The IRDF, JE
- Page 68 and 69: — 238 U(n,γ) 239 U(β - ) 239 Np
- Page 70 and 71: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) Only diagon
- Page 72 and 73: TABLE 6.1. INTEGRAL CHARACTERISTICS
- Page 74 and 75: TABLE 6.1. INTEGRAL CHARACTERISTICS
- Page 76 and 77: TABLE 6.2. CROSS-SECTIONS IN IRDF-2
- Page 78 and 79: TABLE 6.2. CROSS-SECTIONS IN IRDF-2
- Page 80 and 81: TABLE 6.2. CROSS-SECTIONS IN IRDF-2
- Page 84 and 85: 7. CONSISTENCY TEST OF THE CROSS-SE
- Page 86 and 87: TABLE 7.1. REFERENCE NEUTRON FIELDS
- Page 88 and 89: Fluence, (E) (MeV -1 ) 10 7 10 6 10
- Page 90 and 91: TABLE 7.2. SPECTRUM AVERAGED DOSIME
- Page 92 and 93: testing of electronic components an
- Page 94 and 95: Table 7.3 details the 34 dosimetry
- Page 96 and 97: 7.2. RESULTS OF CONSISTENCY TESTING
- Page 98 and 99: TABLE 7.4. RATIO OF SPECTRUM AVERAG
- Page 100 and 101: TABLE 7.4. RATIO OF SPECTRUM AVERAG
- Page 102 and 103: TABLE 7.4. RATIO OF SPECTRUM AVERAG
- Page 104 and 105: [7.7] SEKINE, T., MAEDA, S., AOYAMA
- Page 106 and 107: ecommendations found in ASTM practi
- Page 108 and 109: 10 2 Damage (MeV· mb) 10 1 10 0 10
- Page 110 and 111: 10 2 Damage (MeV· mb) 10 1 10 0 10
- Page 112 and 113: 9. DECAY DATA AND ISOTOPIC ABUNDANC
- Page 114 and 115: 9.1.4. Data processing The required
- Page 116: Protactinium-231 is stated to have
- Page 119 and 120: TABLE I.1. METROLOGY REACTIONS (ACT
- Page 121 and 122: For the convenience of the metrolog
- Page 123 and 124: Such approximate calculations are n
- Page 125 and 126: of each neutron energy group. These
- Page 127 and 128: activation rate for the product iso
- Page 129 and 130: III.1. THERMAL CROSS-SECTIONS Gener
- Page 131 and 132: TABLE III.1. COMPARISON OF THERMAL
- Page 133 and 134:
TABLE III.2. COMPARISON OF CAPTURE
- Page 135 and 136:
TABLE III.3. COMPARISON OF THE Q 0
- Page 137 and 138:
— 50 Cr: Compared with the Mughab
- Page 139 and 140:
REFERENCES TO APPENDIX III [III.1]
- Page 141 and 142:
128
- Page 143 and 144:
130
- Page 145 and 146:
132
- Page 147 and 148:
134
- Page 149 and 150:
136
- Page 151 and 152:
138
- Page 153 and 154:
140
- Page 155 and 156:
142
- Page 157 and 158:
144
- Page 160 and 161:
CONTRIBUTORS TO DRAFTING AND REVIEW
- Page 162:
CONTRIBUTORS TO DRAFTING AND REVIEW