03.06.2015 Views

International Reactor Dosimetry File 2002 - IAEA Publications

International Reactor Dosimetry File 2002 - IAEA Publications

International Reactor Dosimetry File 2002 - IAEA Publications

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

54<br />

— 103 Rh(n,n′) 103 Rh m : Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized<br />

by Zolotarev. Data from the RRDF are almost the same as from the<br />

IRDF, although slightly higher above 14.5 MeV; both data sets are slightly<br />

lower than experimental measurements.<br />

— 109 Ag(n,γ) 110 Ag m : No experimental data are available near 14 MeV.<br />

— 115 In(n,2n) 114 In m : The IRDF is the only available file, and fits the data<br />

with the lowest uncertainties.<br />

— 115 In(n,n′) 115 In m : Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized by<br />

Zolotarev. JENDL is the same as the IRDF, while the RRDF data appear<br />

to give the best fit to the experimental data.<br />

— 127 I(n,2n) 126 I: JENDL and the IRDF are essentially identical, and both<br />

give a reasonable fit to the experimental data (which have relatively large<br />

uncertainties).<br />

— 139 La(n,γ) 140 La: Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized by<br />

Zolotarev. The RRDF evaluation gives a reasonable fit to the experimental<br />

data with the lowest uncertainties, although these data exhibit<br />

considerable scatter around 14 MeV.<br />

— 141 Pr(n,2n) 140 Pr: Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized by<br />

Zolotarev. The RRDF evaluation gives a reasonable fit to the experimental<br />

data, which have relatively large scatter and uncertainties.<br />

— 169 Tm(n,2n) 168 Tm: JENDL gives a good fit to the experimental data.<br />

— 186 W(n,γ) 187 W: Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized by<br />

Zolotarev. The RRDF fits the experimental data, ignoring one high data<br />

point.<br />

— 197 Au(n,γ) 198 Au: Sparse experimental data have considerable scatter<br />

around 14 MeV; the IRDF evaluation gives a reasonable fit.<br />

— 197 Au(n,2n) 196 Au: Data from the IRDF are slightly higher than those<br />

from JENDL, although both give reasonably good fits to the available<br />

experimental data.<br />

— 199 Hg(n,n′) 199 Hg m : JENDL gives a good fit to the sole data point for this<br />

reaction.<br />

— 204 Pb(n,n′) 204 Pb m : The RRDF evaluated cross-section appears to be<br />

somewhat lower than suggested by the available experimental data,<br />

although there is considerable scatter in these data.<br />

— 232 Th(n,f): The IRDF is the only available file, and gives a reasonable fit<br />

to the available data.<br />

— 237 Np(n,f): Experimental data were evaluated and renormalized by<br />

Zolotarev. JENDL is the only available file, and gives a good fit to the<br />

available data with the lowest uncertainties.<br />

— 235 U(n,f): The IRDF gives a good fit to the data with the lowest uncertainties.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!