15.06.2015 Views

e - CIFAS

e - CIFAS

e - CIFAS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GOVERNMENT IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY ABUJA 37<br />

oonsisted entirely of eunuchs; the order of mallams consisted<br />

entirely of Islamic scholars; the order ofhousehold officials, which<br />

contained some slaves as well as freemen, were specially charged<br />

with supervision of the king's household, and formed a royal<br />

council of their o",n; the two orders of public officials were<br />

responsible for territorial, civil, and military administration; and<br />

the remaining order consisted of royal slave-officials.<br />

For lack of any more satisfactory terms, I shall refer to these<br />

groupings as orders of rank, and to their component units as<br />

titles or offices. Offices were associated with titles, and title connoted<br />

rank or membership in a particular order. This use of the<br />

term 'rank' distinguishes it sharply from the more general term<br />

'status'. In the present terminology, a member of the king's line,;<br />

age who lacked office would have royal status but would lack royal<br />

or other rank. As used here, the term 'status' denotes position in a<br />

series of differentiated positions. Thus royal status is distinguished<br />

from non-royal statuses, slave statusfrom free, etc. Inthe context of<br />

state organization, the status of an office is its position within the<br />

system. Such position consists in the last analysis of specific relations<br />

to other units, but these relations also carried prestige. By<br />

status condition we mean position within a series of differentiated<br />

status-groups. Groups of persons differentiated by status are<br />

referred to as status-groups. With these definitions and background<br />

data in mind, the constitution of nineteenth-century Abuja can be<br />

summarized as follows:<br />

Among the titled officials of Ahuja, four basic statuses were<br />

recognized: royals, who were members of the king's lineage or<br />

family, or hereditary chiefs in their own right; freemen, who were<br />

eligible to receive fiefs; eunuchs, who were recruited by the king<br />

from certain villages; and slaves. A fifth status-group consisted of<br />

mallams, who were freemen, butas religious leaders could not hold<br />

fiefs. Mallams were therefore a special group of freemen.<br />

Titles were divided into different rank-orders, and there was an<br />

official order of precedence among title-holders: but this official<br />

order of precedence did not correspond exactly with the grading of<br />

title-holden according to their social status. Promotional opportunities<br />

as well as appointments were defined in terms of social<br />

status. Thus a minor slave-official was eligible for promotion to a<br />

more important office reserved for persons of slave status, and<br />

eunuchs could seek promotion to offices reserved for eunuchs, but<br />

O.z.-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!