21.06.2015 Views

Nonlinear Equations - UFRJ

Nonlinear Equations - UFRJ

Nonlinear Equations - UFRJ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

[SEC. 1.1: BÉZOUT’S THEOREM 5<br />

The derivative of the evaluation function ev : f, x ↦→ f(x) is<br />

ḟ, ẋ ↦→ Df(x)ẋ + ḟ(x).<br />

Assume that f 0 (x 0 ) = 0 with Df 0 (x 0 )ẋ non-degenerate. Then the<br />

derivative of ev with respect to the x variables is an isomorphism. By<br />

the implicit function theorem, there is a neighborhood U ∋ f 0 and a<br />

function x(f) : U → C n so that f(x 0 ) = f 0 and<br />

ev(f(x), x) ≡ 0.<br />

Now, let<br />

{<br />

}<br />

Σ = f : ∃x ∈ P n+1 : f h (1, x) = 0 and (det Df(·)) h (1, x) = 0 .<br />

By elimination theory, Σ is a Zariski closed set. It does not contain<br />

f ini , so its complement is not empty.<br />

Let g be a polynomial system not in Σ and without roots at<br />

infinity. (Fact 3 says that this is true for a generic g). We claim that<br />

g has the same number of roots as f ini .<br />

Since Σ and the set of polynomials with roots at infinity are<br />

Zariski closed, there is a smooth path (or homotopy) between f ini<br />

and g avoiding those sets. Along this path, locally, the root count is<br />

constant. Indeed, let I ⊆ [0, 1] be the maximal interval so that the<br />

implicit function x t for f t (x t ) ≡ 0 can be defined. Let t 0 = sup I.<br />

If 1 ≠ t 0 ∈ I, then (by the implicit function theorem) the implicit<br />

function x t can be extended to some interval (0, t 0 + ɛ) contradicting<br />

that t 0 = sup I. So let’s suppose that t 0 ∉ I. The fact that f t0 has<br />

no root at infinity makes x t convergent when t → t 0 ± ɛ. Hence x t<br />

can be extended to the closed interval [0, t 0 ], another contradiction.<br />

Therefore I = [0, 1].<br />

Thus, f ini and g have the same number of roots.<br />

Until now we counted roots of systems outside Σ. Suppose that<br />

f ∈ Σ has more roots than the Bézout bound. By lower semicontinuity<br />

of the root count, there is a neighborhood of f (in the<br />

usual topology) where there are at least as many roots as in f. However,<br />

this neighborhood is not contained in Σ, contradiction.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!