05.07.2015 Views

ssh-chemsex-study-final-main-report

ssh-chemsex-study-final-main-report

ssh-chemsex-study-final-main-report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Interviews took place either at the Sigma Research offices<br />

at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, or<br />

at the homes of participants. They lasted between one<br />

and two hours and explored, in detail:<br />

• men’s sexual history and current sexual behaviour;<br />

• drug use and history of drug taking;<br />

• motivations for using drugs during sex;<br />

• perceived social norms surrounding <strong>chemsex</strong>;<br />

• the impact of drugs on sexual practice and sexual<br />

pleasure;<br />

• harms relating to <strong>chemsex</strong> they had personally<br />

experienced or witnessed in others;<br />

• and experiences of managing their drug use and/or<br />

seeking help.<br />

All interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed<br />

verbatim. Data was subjected to a rigorous, inductive<br />

thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006), aided by<br />

qualitative analysis software, NVIVO.<br />

2.3 FOCUS GROUPS WITH MEMBERS OF LOCAL GAY COMMUNITY<br />

In order to understand perceived community norms<br />

relating to <strong>chemsex</strong>, we convened two focus groups with<br />

gay and bisexual men resident in Lambeth, Southwark<br />

and Lewisham. These men were recruited via social<br />

media, e-newsletters distributed by community based<br />

organisations that cater for gay men, and some had<br />

volunteered to take part in interviews after the quota of<br />

30 participants had been met. Most of those who took<br />

part had experience of using drugs within the previous<br />

12 months, although this was not an essential criteria for<br />

inclusion. Of the 12 men who took part in total, one had<br />

diagnosed HIV while 11 had last tested negative. They<br />

varied in age from 25 to 53 (mean = 38) and all were of<br />

white ethnicity (however seven were non-British). Nine<br />

men were resident in Lambeth, two in Southwark and<br />

one in Lewisham and all described themselves as gay.<br />

Discussions within these groups centred on perceptions<br />

of drug use on the gay scene in London (historically<br />

and currently), perceptions and understandings of<br />

<strong>chemsex</strong>, perceived harms associated with <strong>chemsex</strong>, and<br />

perceptions of services (existing and potential) to meet<br />

the needs of gay men in South London.<br />

2.4 FOCUS GROUP & INTERVIEWS WITH COMMUNITY AND CLINICAL SERVICE<br />

PROVIDERS<br />

In mid-November 2013 a focus group was convened with<br />

staff and volunteers from community based organisations<br />

that work to support the sexual health and well-being<br />

needs of gay men in Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham.<br />

A total of 11 people took part, representing 4 different<br />

organisations and a range of job roles, from counsellors<br />

and mentors, to service mangers. Discussion centred<br />

on experience of supporting gay and bisexual men in<br />

relation to their drug use, perceptions on changing<br />

drug use trends among the gay community, changes in<br />

service delivery in response to the issue of <strong>chemsex</strong>, and<br />

perceived service development need.<br />

Four brief interviews (of between 30 and 45 minutes)<br />

were also conducted with clinical service providers<br />

from each of the boroughs. These were a sexual health<br />

consultant, a lead health advisor and two specialist<br />

nurses. Discussion mirrored the community-based service<br />

providers’ focus group.<br />

The clinical and community provider focus groups and<br />

interviews helped to shape the content of the interviews,<br />

framed priorities for analysis and contributed to the<br />

recommendations outlined in chapter 9, however the<br />

data collected within them does not feature heavily in<br />

this <strong>report</strong>.<br />

The Chemsex Study | 2. METHODS 16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!