Work Plan - Final - Maricopa County Department of Transportation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

x333Attendees (cont’d)Hidden Waters Parkway: Interstate 10 to SR 74Corridor Feasibility Study - Project #TT005Maricopa Association of Governments302 N. 1 st Avenue, Suite 300Phoenix, AZ 85003Tim Strow 602-254-6300tstrow@azmag.govMaricopa Department of Transportation2901 W. DurangoPhoenix, AZ 85009Denise Lacey Project Manager 602-506-6172deniselacey@mail.maricopa.govJim Sargent Traffic 602-506-8678jimsargent@mail.maricopa.govHugh Davidson Planning 602-506-8082hughdavidson@mail.maricopa.govSnell & Wilmer – Toyota Technical Testing CenterOne Arizona CenterPhoenix, AZ 85004Noel Griemsmann 602-382-6824ngriemsmann@swlaw.comToyota Technical Center30700 W. Patton RoadWittmann, AZ 85361Mark Schrage 623-546-5350mark.schrage@tema.toyota.comTown of Buckeye/Woody ScouttenScott Zipprich 623-547-4661scott@scoutten.comWVSV Holdings1121 W. Warner, Suite 109Tempe, AZ 85284Richard Maes Project Manager 480-831-2000 602-723-1170richardm@vistoso.netRH & Associates, Inc.3
x444AgendaHidden Waters Parkway:Interstate 10 to State Route 74Corridor Feasibility Study Scoping SessionAgendaNovember 1, 20108:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.Hidden Waters Parkway: Interstate 10 to SR 74Corridor Feasibility Study - Project #TT005Welcome & Introductions – Denise LaceyReview Scoping Process – Renee HoekstraProject UnderstandingDefine Corridor Improvement StudyStudy AreaProject Overview (purpose & need)Project Goals/Expectations/ObjectivesIdentify Project issues/constraintsDiscuss Planning Budget & ExpectationsIntroduce Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) MembersIdentify TAC RolePhase I – Corridor Study Area Planning Evaluation Overview – Denise LaceyPhase II – Candidate Alternatives and Preferred Alignment Overview – Denise LaceyBreak (Excuse Stakeholders)Work Plan DevelopmentTech Memo 1 – Existing and Future Corridor Features AnalysisTech Memo 2 – Environmental OverviewTech Memo 3 – Drainage OverviewTech Memo 4 – Development and Evaluation of Candidate AlternativesTechnical Memorandum #5 - Preferred AlignmentDrawingsDesign GuidelinesImplementation PlanPlanning Level Cost EstimatesRH & Associates, Inc.4
Page 1 and 2: Hidden Waters Parkway NorthCorridor
Page 3 and 4: AbbreviationsArizona Department of
Page 5 and 6: 2.0 Study Area Definition/Project U
Page 7 and 8: 3.0 Key IssuesThe intent of this st
Page 9 and 10: 3.2 DrainageThe Hidden Waters Corri
Page 11 and 12: 5.0 Study Process and ApproachThe H
Page 13 and 14: Figure 5-2 Project ScheduleHidden W
Page 15 and 16: Arizona Parkway Intersection/Interc
Page 17 and 18: 8.0 Criteria for Evaluation of Alte
Page 19 and 20: xHiddenWaters Parkway: Interstate 1
Page 21: xAttendeesHidden Waters Parkway: In
Page 25 and 26: xHiddenProject GoalsWaters Parkway:
Page 27 and 28: xHiddenTechnical Advisory Committee
Page 29 and 30: x111Scope of WorkHidden Waters Park
Page 31 and 32: ContentsStudy Overview ............
Page 33 and 34: the first step in the development p
Page 35 and 36: • Topography from existing source
Page 37 and 38: Product: Technical Memorandum #2 -
Page 39 and 40: o CAP drainage studies that address
Page 41 and 42: 3.1. Technical Advisory Committee (
Page 43 and 44: o Douglas Rancho Toyota Proving Gro
Page 45 and 46: • Study Purpose/Need,• Study Go
Page 47 and 48: The Consultant will prepare the cor
Page 49 and 50: x222Project NotesProject Budget:$50
Page 51 and 52: Type First Name Last Name Title Com
Page 53 and 54: HIDDEN WATERS PARKWAY CFS: QUALITY
Page 55 and 56: verification of verbal conversation
Page 57: □ Preferred Alignmento Standard c

Work Plan - Final - Maricopa County Department of Transportation

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?