Work Plan - Final - Maricopa County Department of Transportation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

xHiddenIssues/InformationWaters Parkway: Interstate 10 to SR 74Corridor Feasibility Study - Project #TT005These issues need to be considered for future action or provide information to the planning teamon things to be considered.1. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT FROM DOUGLAS RANCH AND BELMONT2. I-11 ADOT EIS IN JANUARY 20113. WICKENBURG FRAMEWORK STUDY – FINAL APPROVAL 11/20104. RESPONSIVE TO DRAINAGE IN THE AREA5. EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITY CORRIDORS6. CAP CANALS AND ACCESS7. APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATIONS FROM BELMONT8. LACK OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION/STUDIES IN THE AREA• Phase I from Belmont is available9. BLM/MARICOPA COUNTY REGIONAL PARK VULTURE MINE STUDY• Study may have environmental information10. GRAZING LESEES ON STATE LANDS• Impacts to fencing requirements11. APPROVED MASTER PLANS FOR EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS• Identify and considerRH & Associates, Inc.
x111Scope of WorkHidden Waters Parkway: Interstate 10 to SR 74Corridor Feasibility Study - Project #TT005The scope of work elements for the design consultant was discussed and additional items orcomments are included in the following document. It is the responsibility of the consultant touse these comments to determine their final scope and fees to be submitted to MCDOT.RH & Associates, Inc.
Page 1 and 2: Hidden Waters Parkway NorthCorridor
Page 3 and 4: AbbreviationsArizona Department of
Page 5 and 6: 2.0 Study Area Definition/Project U
Page 7 and 8: 3.0 Key IssuesThe intent of this st
Page 9 and 10: 3.2 DrainageThe Hidden Waters Corri
Page 11 and 12: 5.0 Study Process and ApproachThe H
Page 13 and 14: Figure 5-2 Project ScheduleHidden W
Page 15 and 16: Arizona Parkway Intersection/Interc
Page 17 and 18: 8.0 Criteria for Evaluation of Alte
Page 19 and 20: xHiddenWaters Parkway: Interstate 1
Page 21 and 22: xAttendeesHidden Waters Parkway: In
Page 23 and 24: x444AgendaHidden Waters Parkway:Int
Page 25 and 26: xHiddenProject GoalsWaters Parkway:
Page 27: xHiddenTechnical Advisory Committee
Page 31 and 32: ContentsStudy Overview ............
Page 33 and 34: the first step in the development p
Page 35 and 36: • Topography from existing source
Page 37 and 38: Product: Technical Memorandum #2 -
Page 39 and 40: o CAP drainage studies that address
Page 41 and 42: 3.1. Technical Advisory Committee (
Page 43 and 44: o Douglas Rancho Toyota Proving Gro
Page 45 and 46: • Study Purpose/Need,• Study Go
Page 47 and 48: The Consultant will prepare the cor
Page 49 and 50: x222Project NotesProject Budget:$50
Page 51 and 52: Type First Name Last Name Title Com
Page 53 and 54: HIDDEN WATERS PARKWAY CFS: QUALITY
Page 55 and 56: verification of verbal conversation
Page 57: □ Preferred Alignmento Standard c

Work Plan - Final - Maricopa County Department of Transportation

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?