Work Plan - Final - Maricopa County Department of Transportation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

x555Agenda (cont’d)MeetingsTAC MeetingsStudy MeetingsPublic Open HousesHidden Waters Parkway: Interstate 10 to SR 74Corridor Feasibility Study - Project #TT005Stakeholder & Public ParticipationProject Management TasksQuality ControlReportingSchedulingReport StandardsDeliverablesAdditional Work, as DirectedFinalize Level of EffortNext StepsFinal ScopeSchedule Fee Negotiations MeetingNotice to Proceed ScheduleRH & Associates, Inc.5
xHiddenProject GoalsWaters Parkway: Interstate 10 to SR 74Corridor Feasibility Study - Project #TT005Project Purpose:Preserve the right-of-way and connectivity, while providing a guiding document for futuredevelopment.Project Need:Follow-up on recommendations from Hassayampa Study of moving traffic into the future.Study Goals & Expectations:The project team members discussed the various aspects of the project and agreed on thefollowing goals that support the success of this planning effort. Consider the approved alignments - - Douglas Ranch & Belmont- Maintain existing approved alignments- Verify the existing information to ensure they meet the intent of the MAG study Identification of future studies Consider the impact to Toyota relative to confidentiality issues at the Proving Grounds- Avoid view points that allow sight into the Proving Grounds- Toyota views this as a 100-year facility, i.e. land use Alignment with Belmont Development at Peoria Establish connectivity through the corridor Alignment considerations with ADOT tie ins- Parkway to Freeway connections Review and identify environmental fatal flaws Use the Hassayampa framework study related to east west connections Consider access points on state lands- Avoid leaving land undevelopable Wildlife Connectivity/Linkage Minimize Roadway Development Costs Maintain/Limit Negative Impact to Whispering Ranch- Be cognizant of parcel splits and impacts Collaboration with Other On-going Studies (MAG, MCDOT, FCDMC, ADOT)- Interchange at Northern- McDowell- I-11 Corridor (kicks off January 2011) Consistency with Existing Corridor StudiesRH & Associates, Inc.
Page 1 and 2: Hidden Waters Parkway NorthCorridor
Page 3 and 4: AbbreviationsArizona Department of
Page 5 and 6: 2.0 Study Area Definition/Project U
Page 7 and 8: 3.0 Key IssuesThe intent of this st
Page 9 and 10: 3.2 DrainageThe Hidden Waters Corri
Page 11 and 12: 5.0 Study Process and ApproachThe H
Page 13 and 14: Figure 5-2 Project ScheduleHidden W
Page 15 and 16: Arizona Parkway Intersection/Interc
Page 17 and 18: 8.0 Criteria for Evaluation of Alte
Page 19 and 20: xHiddenWaters Parkway: Interstate 1
Page 21 and 22: xAttendeesHidden Waters Parkway: In
Page 23: x444AgendaHidden Waters Parkway:Int
Page 27 and 28: xHiddenTechnical Advisory Committee
Page 29 and 30: x111Scope of WorkHidden Waters Park
Page 31 and 32: ContentsStudy Overview ............
Page 33 and 34: the first step in the development p
Page 35 and 36: • Topography from existing source
Page 37 and 38: Product: Technical Memorandum #2 -
Page 39 and 40: o CAP drainage studies that address
Page 41 and 42: 3.1. Technical Advisory Committee (
Page 43 and 44: o Douglas Rancho Toyota Proving Gro
Page 45 and 46: • Study Purpose/Need,• Study Go
Page 47 and 48: The Consultant will prepare the cor
Page 49 and 50: x222Project NotesProject Budget:$50
Page 51 and 52: Type First Name Last Name Title Com
Page 53 and 54: HIDDEN WATERS PARKWAY CFS: QUALITY
Page 55 and 56: verification of verbal conversation
Page 57: □ Preferred Alignmento Standard c

Work Plan - Final - Maricopa County Department of Transportation

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?