Response to Comments - Presidio Trust

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Oyharcabal, Dan: (AL-4), 13; (AL-5), 15; (HR-2), 62; (LU-2), 26Pacific Heights Residents Association: (AL-3), 13; (DP-1), 24; (TR-11), 41; (TR-23), 49; (TR-26), 51Paley, Morton D: (BI-1), 70Parke, Margot: (DP-1), 24; (TR-26), 51Paschke, Barbara: (AL-4), 13; (AL-5), 15; (HR-2), 62; (LU-2), 26Peek, Stephanie: (AL-4), 13; (AL-5), 15; (HR-2), 62; (LU-2), 26Peipher, Sue: (AL-2), 11; (AL-5), 15Perlstein, David: (AL-2), 11; (AL-4), 13; (AL-5), 15; (HR-2), 62; (LU-2), 26; (TR-1), 31Planning Association for the Richmond: (AL-4), 13; (EP-3), 76; (GE-4), 8; (LU-3), 27Portaro, Elizabeth: (AL-4), 13; (AL-5), 15; (HR-2), 62; (LU-2), 26Portaro, Sal: (AL-2), 11; (AL-5), 15; (FI-1), 19; (TR-8), 39Poulson, Lory: (BI-1), 70Reardon, Michael and Jill Lawrence: (BI-1), 70Rice, David: (BI-1), 70Richman, Daniel: (AL-2), 11; (LU-3), 27Richmond Presidio Neighbors: (AL-1), 10; (AL-2), 11; (AL-4), 13; (AL-5), 15; (AQ-6), 66; (DP-1), 24;(EP-1), 74; (FI-1), 19; (FI-2), 21; (FI-3), 23; (HR-2), 62; (LU-2), 26; (LU-4), 29; (LU-5), 30;(TR-15), 45; (TR-19), 47; (TR-24), 50; (TR-26), 51; (TR-31), 57; (TR-6), 36; (TR-7), 37;(TR-8), 39; (TR-9), 40Ridley, H. Allan: (BI-1), 70Ripple, Kate: (AL-4), 13; (AL-5), 15; (HR-2), 62; (LU-2), 26Ruston, Sophie: (AL-4), 13; (AL-5), 15; (HR-2), 62; (LU-2), 26Ryan, Anne K: (AL-4), 13; (AL-5), 15; (HR-2), 62; (LU-2), 26Sabino. Dan: (BI-1), 70Sahl, Michele: (AL-4), 13; (AL-5), 15; (HR-2), 62; (LU-2), 26San Francisco Bicycle Coalition: (AL-5), 15; (TR-1), 31; (TR-24), 50; (TR-3), 34San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association: (AL-2), 11; (HR-1), 61; (HR-4), 63;(LU-3), 27; (LU-6), 30; (OT-1), 73; (TR-1), 31; (TR-24), 50Public Health Service Hospital Response to Comments 119
Santamaria, David, Founder and Advisor of Urban Planners of America: (EP-3), 76; (GE-1), 7;(TR-24), 50; (TR-29), 53; (TR-8), 39Shadoan, Antje: (AL-4), 13; (AL-5), 15; (HR-2), 62; (LU-2), 26Skal, Woody: (AL-2), 11; (FI-1), 19Smith, Dale: (ER-1), 71; (HR-2), 62; (HR-4), 63; (LU-5), 30; (LU-8), 31; (TR-24), 50; (TR-8), 39Smith, M. Bradley: (AL-2), 11Starzel, Mary Beth: (LU-3), 27Steele, Laurie: (TR-8), 39Strandberg, Lynn: (BI-1), 70Strobel, Jeanine E: (BI-1), 70Support the Position of Richmond Presidio Neighbors – Alternative 3 is the Only Alternative Compatiblewith the Neighborhood (Form Letter): (AL-4), 13; (AL-5), 15; (HR-2), 62; (LU-2), 26Swagel, Eric N., M.D.: (AL-2), 11; (LU-3), 27; (LU-5), 30Szajnberg, Nathan, MD: (AL-4), 13; (AL-5), 15; (HR-2), 62; (LU-2), 26Tevis, Yvonne Pacheco: (AL-4), 13; (AL-5), 15; (HR-2), 62; (LU-2), 26Tsiu, Sharon: (AL-2), 11; (AL-6), 18; (BI-1), 70; (LU-2), 26; (TR-17), 46Tucker, Suzanne: (AL-2), 11; (AL-5), 15; (HR-2), 62; (TR-8), 39United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office:(AL-2), 11United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Golden Gate National Recreation Area:(AL-2), 11; (BI-2), 71; (HR-1), 61; (PN-1), 9; (UT-4), 68United States Department of the Interior, Office of the Secretary, Office of Environmental Policy andCompliance: (AL-2), 11; (BI-2), 71; (HR-1), 61; (PN-1), 9; (UT-4), 68United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX: (AQ-2), 64; (AQ-3), 65; (AQ-4), 65;(GE-1), 7; (TR-28), 52Van Dyke, Mike: (AL-2), 11; (LU-2), 26; (TR-1), 31Wagar, Vanessa: (AL-4), 13; (AL-5), 15; (HR-2), 62; (LU-2), 26Wakefield, Jedediah: (AL-4), 13; (AL-5), 15; (HR-2), 62; (LU-2), 26120 Directory of Responses to Comments Public Health Service Hospital
Page 7 and 8:
Sharon KatoAnsel D. KinneyRich Koch
Page 9 and 10:
Table 2. Organization of Responses
Page 11 and 12:
1 Responses to Comments1.1 GENERAL
Page 13 and 14:
during the initiation of scoping fo
Page 15 and 16:
within the level of activity analyz
Page 17 and 18:
million more than Alternative 4. Co
Page 19 and 20:
AL-5. Incorporation of Park Presidi
Page 21 and 22:
Table 3. Traffic Signal Warrants An
Page 23 and 24:
leads me to conclude that the Trust
Page 25 and 26:
ehabilitated or redeveloped; most o
Page 27 and 28:
approaches would fall within the ra
Page 29 and 30:
of the alternatives would remove bu
Page 31 and 32:
“unenlightening.” They noted th
Page 33 and 34:
The project provides for adequate b
Page 35 and 36:
used, in conjunction with other dis
Page 37 and 38:
the Park Presidio Boulevard Access
Page 39 and 40:
The traffic volumes associated with
Page 41 and 42:
associated with the Lone Mountain C
Page 43 and 44:
Table 4. Trip Generation DataWEEKDA
Page 45 and 46:
to another location in the neighbor
Page 47 and 48:
Response TR-12 - In response to the
Page 49 and 50:
Boulevard and the proportion coming
Page 51 and 52:
agrees with commenters that measure
Page 53 and 54:
TR-21. Impact of Additional Traffic
Page 55 and 56:
TR-25. Transportation Demand Manage
Page 57 and 58:
Response TR-28 - The Trust will con
Page 59 and 60:
Table 6. Existing + Project Conditi
Page 61 and 62:
TR-31. Estimated Traffic Generated
Page 63 and 64:
Table 9. Traffic Count Data at 15 t
Page 65 and 66:
• Clarification of footnotes;•
Page 67 and 68:
uilding (See SEIS Section 3.7.2). T
Page 69 and 70: one-hour and eight-hour average CO
Page 71 and 72: demand on weekends under Alternativ
Page 73 and 74: any increase in storm water flow fr
Page 75 and 76: Habitat), proposed human use associ
Page 77 and 78: any potential effects to water qual
Page 79 and 80: The Trust will determine whether th
Page 81 and 82: 2 Public Agency CommentsUnited Stat
Page 83 and 84: 80 Public Agency Comments Public He
Page 99 and 100: 2.5 GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND
Page 101 and 102: 2.6 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISC
Page 103 and 104: Public Health Service Hospital Resp
Page 117 and 118: Chiuchiarelli, Nicky: (AL-2), 11; (
Page 119: Knox, Aliza: (AL-4), 13; (AL-5), 15
show all

Response to Comments - Presidio Trust

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?