Response to Comments - Presidio Trust

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 2. Organization of Responses to Comments on the PHSH Draft SEISTOPICGeneral CommentsSummaryPurpose and NeedAlternativesFinancial InformationDistrict-Wide PlanningLand Use, Housing andSchoolsTransportationAdequacy of Information in Draft SEISRequest for Summary of PTMP EISSignificance StandardsIncorporation of Previous CommentsMinimum RequirementsSUBJECT MATTERRequest for Additional Natural Resources Protection GoalRequest for Additional Neighborhood Compatibility ObjectiveRequested No Action Alternative vs. True No Action BenchmarkReconsideration of Preferred AlternativeMore In-Depth Comparison of Alternatives 2 and 3Preference for Alternative 2 in Light of Project ObjectivesIncorporation of Park Presidio Access into the Final SEIS and the Lease AgreementRemoval of Battery Caulfield Development from All AlternativesOmission of Key Financial InformationFailure to Consider Financial SolutionsFailure to Consider and Disclose All Costs and BenefitsDevelopment Plans for the Entire DistrictImpact on Other Planning Districts in the PresidioResidential Densities and Surrounding NeighborhoodsPHSH Project as a San Francisco Residential DevelopmentJobs/Housing BalanceSenior HousingAffordable HousingContribution to San Francisco SchoolsLong-Term Use of Battery CaulfieldBlocking the 14 th & 15 th Avenue GatesAlternatives to Park Presidio Boulevard Access VariantEffects of Park Presidio Boulevard Access Variant on Highway 1 Traffic OperationsEffect of Park Presidio Boulevard Access Variant on Pedestrian and Bicycle SafetyEncroachment PermitRequested No Action Alternative Trip Generation RatesCity GuidelinesNeighborhood Quality of Life and Residential Level of Service (RLOS) CriteriaParking Demand AnalysisTransit Trip Distribution and AssignmentImpact of Transportation Policies, Including Live-Work ModelSignificance CriteriaExpansion of Traffic AnalysisMischaracterized Existing Traffic ConditionsProjected Traffic Through the 14 th and 15 th Avenue GatesCut-Through TrafficBattery Caulfield RoadUnderstated Traffic Impacts4 Introduction Public Health Service Hospital
Table 2. Organization of Responses to Comments on the PHSH Draft SEISTOPICHistoric ResourcesArchaeologicalResourcesAir Quality and NoiseUtilities and ServicesHydrology, Wetlandsand Water QualityBiologyEnvironmentalRemediationOther TopicsSUBJECT MATTERContribution to Cumulative Traffic EffectsCumulative Traffic Forecast AssumptionsImpact of Additional Traffic on City ResourcesConstruction Traffic Management PlanVariance in Construction Traffic ImpactsTransportation Demand ManagementTransportation Demand Management ActionsFeasibility of Mitigation MeasuresFinancial Contribution to Mitigation MeasuresTransit Monitoring and Mitigation MeasuresReadability of SEISExisting plus Project AnalysisEstimated Traffic Generated by Former HospitalTraffic Generated by Recent PHSH District UsesTransit ConcernsClarifications and Editorial CommentsLowering of Building 1801 WingsRemoval of Building 1801 WingsDemolition of Building 1801Interpretation of Nike Missile Facility and Marine CemeteryPotential Effect on Archaeological ResourcesEstimates of Air Quality Impacts and ContaminantsComparison of Carbon Monoxide (CO) EmissionsMitigation of Construction EmissionsPotential Impact on Point Reyes National SeashoreFederal Standards for Fine Particulate MatterCharacterization of Noise Levels within Alternatives 2 and 3General Construction/Demolition EmissionsSFFD InvolvementNew Fire StationRevisions to CCSF StreetsAdequacy of CCSF Sewer System and Treatment Plant CapacitiesWater Supply and DemandImpact of Mitigation MeasuresImpacts on California QuailProhibition on PetsRemediation of Contaminated SitesImpact on Lobos Creek from Landfill 10Sustainable TechnologiesPublic Health Service Hospital Response to Comments 5
Page 7: Sharon KatoAnsel D. KinneyRich Koch
Page 11 and 12: 1 Responses to Comments1.1 GENERAL
Page 13 and 14: during the initiation of scoping fo
Page 15 and 16: within the level of activity analyz
Page 17 and 18: million more than Alternative 4. Co
Page 19 and 20: AL-5. Incorporation of Park Presidi
Page 21 and 22: Table 3. Traffic Signal Warrants An
Page 23 and 24: leads me to conclude that the Trust
Page 25 and 26: ehabilitated or redeveloped; most o
Page 27 and 28: approaches would fall within the ra
Page 29 and 30: of the alternatives would remove bu
Page 31 and 32: “unenlightening.” They noted th
Page 33 and 34: The project provides for adequate b
Page 35 and 36: used, in conjunction with other dis
Page 37 and 38: the Park Presidio Boulevard Access
Page 39 and 40: The traffic volumes associated with
Page 41 and 42: associated with the Lone Mountain C
Page 43 and 44: Table 4. Trip Generation DataWEEKDA
Page 45 and 46: to another location in the neighbor
Page 47 and 48: Response TR-12 - In response to the
Page 49 and 50: Boulevard and the proportion coming
Page 51 and 52: agrees with commenters that measure
Page 53 and 54: TR-21. Impact of Additional Traffic
Page 55 and 56: TR-25. Transportation Demand Manage
Page 57 and 58: Response TR-28 - The Trust will con
Page 59 and 60:
Table 6. Existing + Project Conditi
Page 61 and 62:
TR-31. Estimated Traffic Generated
Page 63 and 64:
Table 9. Traffic Count Data at 15 t
Page 65 and 66:
• Clarification of footnotes;•
Page 67 and 68:
uilding (See SEIS Section 3.7.2). T
Page 69 and 70:
one-hour and eight-hour average CO
Page 71 and 72:
demand on weekends under Alternativ
Page 73 and 74:
any increase in storm water flow fr
Page 75 and 76:
Habitat), proposed human use associ
Page 77 and 78:
any potential effects to water qual
Page 79 and 80:
The Trust will determine whether th
Page 81 and 82:
2 Public Agency CommentsUnited Stat
Page 83 and 84:
80 Public Agency Comments Public He
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
2.5 GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND
Page 101 and 102:
2.6 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISC
Page 103 and 104:
Public Health Service Hospital Resp
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Chiuchiarelli, Nicky: (AL-2), 11; (
Page 119 and 120:
Knox, Aliza: (AL-4), 13; (AL-5), 15
Page 121 and 122:
Santamaria, David, Founder and Advi
show all

Response to Comments - Presidio Trust

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?