10.07.2015 Views

Moelleriella, and Samuelsia - CBS

Moelleriella, and Samuelsia - CBS

Moelleriella, and Samuelsia - CBS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ch av e r r i e t a l.from stromata. Conidia in PDA at 25 °C after three wk are alsogenerally smaller than conidia from stromata. Hypocrella hirsutadid not produce a pycnidial anamorph in culture, but did producea hirsutella-like synanamorph. Production of diffusing pigmentwas not observed in the cultures examined.<strong>Samuelsia</strong> morphologyThe stroma morphology in <strong>Samuelsia</strong> is somewhat conserved.The stromatal size of <strong>Samuelsia</strong> species treated in this studydoes not vary greatly <strong>and</strong> ranges from ca. 2–3 mm diam. Thecolours of the stromata are in shades of yellowish brown. Theshape of the stromata is generally pulvinate with a wide base,becoming convex. The surface of the stroma can be dull/matt,opaque, glabrous, or roughened. A hypothallus is present only inS. sheikhii. The species examined have a reaction to 3 % KOHon the tissue of the stromata. The stromata turn brown when KOHis added; S. sheikhii becomes dark reddish. The tissue structureof the stroma surface is highly conserved among the examinedspecies. All species studied have the tissue type referred to astextura epidermoidea. The cell-walls of the stromatal hyphae areca. 2 µm thick. The inner tissue below the outermost layer ofthe stroma is also textura epidermoidea.Perithecia in <strong>Samuelsia</strong> are completely embedded in thestroma. When the stroma contains perithecia <strong>and</strong> pycnidia, theperithecia are towards the edges of the stroma, with pycnidiatowards the centre. The ostioles are in shades of orange or brown.In longitudinal section, perithecia are elongated to subglobose,sometimes globose, with walls composed of 3–4 layers of highlycompacted thin-walled cells.The asci are cylindrical <strong>and</strong> sometimes swollen in the middle.The ascus cap is thickened (ca. 1.5–3 µm) <strong>and</strong> with a conspicuousring. <strong>Samuelsia</strong> geonomis has a thin ascus cap (ca. 1–1.5 µm).The ascospores are always filiform or long fusiform, hyaline <strong>and</strong>smooth. The species studied have ascospores ca. 45–50 × 2 µm.The shape of the anamorphic stromata is also pulvinate, likethat of the stromata containing the teleomorph. Conidiomata of<strong>Samuelsia</strong> are pycnidium-like, with one to few (ca. 2–5) loculesper stroma. The pycnidial locules are simple depressions of thesurface with narrow openings, sometimes slit-like. Sometimes thelocules merge to form a ring, e.g. S. rufobrunnea. The conidiomataare more commonly found than the perithecia, but sometimesboth can occur in the same stroma (e.g. S. rufobrunnea). Thearrangement of the pycnidia in the stroma can be scattered (e.g.most species) or circular. Paraphyses are somewhat circinate.Conidiophores are formed in a compact layer. Phialides areformed from short conidiophores that are sometimes indistinct,branching once monochasial, twice monochasial, monoverticillate,or two level monochasial (Seifert 1985). In most cases, the samespecies may have more than one type of conidiophore branching.The phialides are flask-shaped to slender <strong>and</strong> cylindrical (ca. 10–17 × 1.5–1.8 µm). Exuded conidial masses were not observed.Conidia are hyaline, unicellular, <strong>and</strong> allantoid, ca. 4.5–6 × 1.5–2µm, with a length/width ratio (l/w) ca. 3–4. Cultures did not survivestorage at 8 °C <strong>and</strong> thus cultural observations were not made.DiscussionGeneric conceptA key purpose of systematics is to identify taxa in a hierarchicalsystem (i.e. genera) that reflects the evolution of the organisms.The present taxonomic treatment defines genera based on acombination of phylogenetic <strong>and</strong> morphological characters. Unlikemany other genera in the Hypocreales, teleomorph phenotype in<strong>Moelleriella</strong>, <strong>Samuelsia</strong>, <strong>and</strong> Hypocrella is as diagnostic at thegenus <strong>and</strong> species levels as is anamorph morphology. Resultsfrom the present study demonstrate that Hypocrella s. l. comprisesthree distinct <strong>and</strong> well-supported clades: species with ascosporesthat disarticulate within the ascus (<strong>Moelleriella</strong>); species with nondisarticulatingascospores <strong>and</strong> fusiform conidia (Hypocrella); <strong>and</strong>species with non-disarticulating ascospores <strong>and</strong> allantoid smallconidia (<strong>Samuelsia</strong>). Previous authors have speculated that thespecies of Hypocrella s. l. with disarticulating ascospores shouldbe considered a distinct genus (Hywel-Jones & Evans 1993; Petch1939). In addition to ascospores <strong>and</strong> conidia, stroma shape <strong>and</strong>3 % KOH reaction are synapomorphies for the three genera.<strong>Moelleriella</strong> species have highly variable stromata, but are mostlyeffuse, pulvinate with wide base (almost convex), or globose,<strong>and</strong> the tissue is KOH-. Hypocrella species almost always havepulvinate stromata with a narrow base <strong>and</strong> generally KOH+ tissue.<strong>Samuelsia</strong> species have brown pulvinate stromata with a wide base<strong>and</strong> KOH+ tissue. <strong>Samuelsia</strong> is described here as new.Petch (1921) proposed subgenera of Hypocrella s. l. based onthe insect-host <strong>and</strong> presence of paraphyses in the conidiomata.Based on the results of this study, <strong>and</strong> others previously publishedworks (Hywel-Jones & Evans 1993, Liu et al. 2005, Liu et al. 2006),neither host nor paraphyses are phylogenetically informativecharacters. Therefore, Petch’s subgenera (Hypocrella subg.Fleischeria, anam. Aschersonia subg. Leprieuria <strong>and</strong> (Hypocrellasubg. Hypocrella, anam. Aschersonia subg. Aschersonia) (Petch1921) are rejected.Two clades are present within <strong>Moelleriella</strong> that could potentiallybe classified as subgeneric taxa (e.g. section, subgenus). TheEffuse <strong>and</strong> Globose clades of <strong>Moelleriella</strong> were first recognised byChaverri et al. (2005b); each has some phylogenetically informativemorphological characters. The Effuse clade includes species witheffuse to thin pulvinate stromata that are generally whitish in colour(orangish in a few species), somewhat smaller part-ascospores,<strong>and</strong> slightly larger conidia. The Globose clade includes species withharder <strong>and</strong> more globose stromata in darker shades, slightly largerpart-ascospores, <strong>and</strong> smaller conidia. However, these charactersare not unique for each clade <strong>and</strong> may overlap between clades.Therefore, a classification below the genus level is not proposed.The Pulvinate clade (Chaverri et al. 2005b) corresponds toHypocrella s. str. (Pulvinate A) <strong>and</strong> <strong>Samuelsia</strong> gen. nov. (PulvinateB). Hypocrella s. str. includes Hypocrella discoidea, H. citrina, H.hirsuta, H. disciformis, <strong>and</strong> H. viridans, which have species withlonger ascospores <strong>and</strong> longer slightly fusoid conidia than <strong>Samuelsia</strong>species.Species conceptOver the course of scientific history, taxonomists <strong>and</strong> evolutionarybiologists have attempted to define species concepts usingseveral approaches. The best-known species concepts include18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!