10.07.2015 Views

Moelleriella, and Samuelsia - CBS

Moelleriella, and Samuelsia - CBS

Moelleriella, and Samuelsia - CBS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ne o t r o p i c a l Hy p o c r e l l a, Mo e l l e r i e l l a, a n d Sa m u e l s i aFig. 10. A–G. <strong>Moelleriella</strong> libera. A–D. Stromata. A–B. Stromata containing perithecia. C–D. Stromata containing conidiomata. E. Asci <strong>and</strong> part-ascospores. F. Conidia. G.Colony on PDA at 25 °C after ca. 3 wk. H–K. <strong>Moelleriella</strong> macrostroma. H. Stroma. I. Asci. J. Part-ascospores. K. Conidia. A–B: CUP 067870; C, E: CUP 067341; D: P.C. 321;F–G: CUP-PR 4421; H–J: CUP 67508 (holotype of M. macrostroma); K: CUP 67509. Bars: A–B, D = 1 mm; D, F, I–K = 10 µm.a neotropical <strong>and</strong> subtropical distribution, orange (or sometimesyellow), narrow fusoid conidia, <strong>and</strong> a tuberculate teleomorph. Asdiscussed earlier in the introduction, historically, there has beentaxonomic confusion regarding the relationship between M. libera,commonly called the ‘red fungus,’ <strong>and</strong> the ‘yellow fungus’ “A.”goldiana. Petch (1921) <strong>and</strong> Mains (1959a, b) observed that the twospecies were only distinguished by the colour of the conidial mass,that of the former being red to reddish orange, <strong>and</strong> the latter yellowto orange. Based on results from Liu et al. (2006) <strong>and</strong> this study, themorphological characters that were in the past used to distinguish“A.” aleyrodis from “A.” goldiana are not useful in distinguishingspecies. The connection between M. libera <strong>and</strong> “A.” aleyrodiswas first inferred by Petch (1925) based on two specimens fromPanama. Mains (1959a) cast doubt on the connection due to theinconsistency of the host: M. libera was described on coccids,whereas “A.” aleyrodis was described on Aleyrodes. Examinationof the type specimens demonstrate that M. libera is clearly theteleomorph of “A.” aleyrodis, <strong>and</strong> that is possible that the hosts wasmisidentified or that M. libera has a wide host range.<strong>Moelleriella</strong> libera resembles M. raciborskii <strong>and</strong> M. evansii.<strong>Moelleriella</strong> raciborskii is distributed in the Old World. Manyspecimens found in the Old World that were identified as M. libera(anam. “A.” aleyrodis) are actually M. raciborskii (Liu et al. 2006).<strong>Moelleriella</strong> libera is restricted to the New World. <strong>Moelleriella</strong> liberagenerally has perithecia <strong>and</strong> conidiomata scattered throughout thestroma with reddish orange conidial masses. On the other h<strong>and</strong>,M. evansii has perithecia arranged on the periphery of the stroma<strong>and</strong> conidiomata in a pulvinate bulge in the centre of the stroma.The stromata of M. libera are significantly smaller than M. evansii.<strong>Moelleriella</strong> libera has more slender conidia (l/w ca. 7) than M.evansii (l/w 4.5–5). This species belongs in the Effuse clade.Additional illustrations: figs 4D–F, 6A–K, in Liu et al. (2006).www.studiesinmycology.org43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!