10.07.2015 Views

timberland investments in an institutional portfolio - Iwc.dk

timberland investments in an institutional portfolio - Iwc.dk

timberland investments in an institutional portfolio - Iwc.dk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TIMBERLAND INVESTMENTS IN AN INSTITUTIONAL PORTFOLIO 3Executive SummaryDue to a r<strong>an</strong>ge of attractive perform<strong>an</strong>ce characteristics <strong>an</strong>d diversification opportunitiesfrom <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>timberl<strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>in</strong> a diversified <strong>portfolio</strong>, <strong>in</strong>stitutional <strong>timberl<strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vestments</strong>,especially <strong>in</strong> the USA, have grown signific<strong>an</strong>tly <strong>in</strong> the last 25 years.Timberl<strong>an</strong>d <strong>in</strong>vestment returns c<strong>an</strong> be described as a function of three drivers:• Biological tree growth – ma<strong>in</strong> driver of attractive <strong>an</strong>d stable returns• Timber product price ch<strong>an</strong>ge• Ch<strong>an</strong>ges <strong>in</strong> l<strong>an</strong>d value.Ownership of <strong>timberl<strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>an</strong>d the attend<strong>an</strong>t biological growth <strong>an</strong>d flexibility <strong>in</strong>connection with tim<strong>in</strong>g of entry/exit <strong>an</strong>d tim<strong>in</strong>g of harvests provides <strong>in</strong>vestors with <strong>an</strong>attractive return structure. Biological growth <strong>an</strong>d utilization of the tim<strong>in</strong>g options reducesthe risk of negative returns <strong>an</strong>d results <strong>in</strong> a higher upside potential <strong>an</strong>d a reduceddownside risk compared to <strong><strong>in</strong>vestments</strong> without these characteristics.Returns between professionally m<strong>an</strong>aged <strong>timberl<strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment funds are almost normaldistributed. This <strong>in</strong>dicates that when <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>timberl<strong>an</strong>d</strong> funds, the number of<strong><strong>in</strong>vestments</strong> which needs to be made is limited <strong>in</strong> order to achieve a me<strong>an</strong> return.For asset allocation purposes, <strong>timberl<strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment return characteristics are attractive:• Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>an</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong>dex, <strong>timberl<strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>in</strong> the USA has for the period 1987 –2008 yielded a return of 15.1% p.a. nom<strong>in</strong>al before asset m<strong>an</strong>agement fee. For <strong>an</strong><strong>in</strong>ternationally diversified <strong>timberl<strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>portfolio</strong>, The International Woodl<strong>an</strong>dComp<strong>an</strong>y A/S (IWC) assumes <strong>an</strong> average future <strong>an</strong>nual rate of return of 10% -12% before asset m<strong>an</strong>agement fees.• Historical st<strong>an</strong>dard deviation of returns for the US <strong>in</strong>dex used above has been8.4% p.a. IWC assumes <strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>nual st<strong>an</strong>dard deviation of returns of 8% - 10% for <strong>an</strong><strong>in</strong>ternational <strong>timberl<strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>portfolio</strong>.• Timberl<strong>an</strong>d returns have historically shown low or negative correlations withreturns from traditional asset classes <strong>in</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutional <strong>portfolio</strong>. IWC expectsthis to cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>in</strong> the future, lead<strong>in</strong>g to high diversification benefits when<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>timberl<strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vestments</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutional <strong>portfolio</strong>.The benefits of <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>timberl<strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>portfolio</strong> have been <strong>an</strong>alyzedthrough modern <strong>portfolio</strong> theory. Based on IWC’s asset allocation model, two efficientfrontiers have been produced: one that allows allocations to <strong>timberl<strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vestments</strong>, <strong>an</strong>d<strong>an</strong>other where <strong>timberl<strong>an</strong>d</strong> is not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the <strong>portfolio</strong>. The result is shown <strong>in</strong> thefigure below.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!