Linking the Gaza Strip with the West Bank: - Jerusalem Center For ...

weapons to Palestinian terrorist groups. In addition, airdefense systems positioned along the ridge can interceptenemy aircraft from forward positions, before they reachIsraeli population centers. 218 Therefore it is apparentthat at the very least what is required for Israeli securityis control of the West Bank mountain ridge. Withoutsuch control, Israel makes herself vulnerable to attackby hostile forces. Indeed, U.S. Lt. (Ret.) General Kellyadmitted that, “[i]t is impossible to defend Jerusalemunless you hold the high ground….An aircraft thattakes off from an airport in Amman is going to be overJerusalem in two-and-a-half minutes, so it is utterlyimpossible…to defend the whole country unless I holdthat land.” 219C. Have Technological and PoliticalDevelopments Made Defensible BordersObsolete?The need for defensible borders has in recent years beendisputed. In the era of long-range missiles capable ofcrossing vast amounts of territory in minutes, one wouldthink that the concept of defensible borders was no longerof such importance. In fact, the contrary is true. Historyhas shown that while aerial attacks may cause damage,countries are only conquered by troops occupying land.For example, in Iraq’s 1991 invasion of Kuwait, despitesix weeks of Allied bombing, Kuwait was only liberatedwhen the Allied troops marched into the country. 220Thus, while some argue that modern technology makesdefensible borders no longer as significant as they usedto be, the opposite is, in fact, true. That is, the existenceof modern technology only accentuates the need fordefensible borders.As demonstrated by Hezbollah attacks on Israel duringthe Second Lebanon War of 2006 , the advent of missileshas actually increased the value of territory and space.In the age of missiles, the positioning and dispersal ofinfrastructure, weapons systems and command andcontrol mechanisms become critical. Missile defensecan limit the impact of an attack, but cannot preventit completely, and in the face of a nuclear attack it isthe possibility of response that acts as a deterrent topotential aggressors. This, in turn, is determined bythe territory and depth available to a country. The moreterritory that a state has between itself and its attacker,the better possibility of an effective response and themore of a deterrent it is. This case particularly appliesin Israel, where the majority of Israeli forces are reservetroops who mobilize only within 48 hours of an attack.Defensible borders will enable a numerically weakerIsraeli Defense Forces to withstand an initial assault,until such time as the army is fully mobilized. 221Positive political developments in the Middle East alsomake some doubt the need for defensible bordersfor Israel. Among these are the conclusion of peacetreaties between Israel and Jordan, and Israel and Egyptrespectively, the efforts to democratize Iraq, and thedeparture of the Syrian army from Lebanon. However,as politics in the region are very fluid, no guaranteescan be made that the improved political situation will bepermanent. 222 Defensible borders remain essential.The continued necessity for Israel to maintain defensibleborders is especially so with the imminent possibilityof Iran’s possessing nuclear warheads. Further, whileIsrael may be at peace with Egypt and Jordan, she is notat peace with other Arab countries within the region.Threats still exist from countries such as Syria, Iran, andSaudi Arabia, which could purchase advanced militarytechnology with billions of dollars in oil revenues andsubsequently fire missiles into Israeli territory. Despitepolitical developments in the Middle East, this indicatesIsrael’s continuing need for defensible borders.US President George W. Bush recognized this need and,in his April 14, 2004 letter to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon,committed US support. Bush wrote that “[t]he UnitedStates reiterates its steadfast commitment to Israel’ssecurity, including secure and defensible borders,and to preserve and strengthen Israel’s capability todeter and defend itself, by itself, against any threat orpossible combination of threats.” 224 Bush reiterated thiscommitment in a statement on April 11, 2005, made toPrime Minister Ariel Sharon, in Crawford, Texas. Bushpage 39