10.07.2015 Views

2006-2007 Student Handbook - University of the Incarnate Word

2006-2007 Student Handbook - University of the Incarnate Word

2006-2007 Student Handbook - University of the Incarnate Word

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

F. Final Review1. Accused students or complainants may petition within three (3) school days <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> written decision to<strong>the</strong> Community Review Board for <strong>the</strong> review <strong>of</strong> a decision reached by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Student</strong> Conduct ReviewCouncil or a sanction imposed. Such petitions will be in writing and will be delivered to <strong>the</strong> Vice Presidentfor Academic & <strong>Student</strong> Affairs.If <strong>the</strong> Vice President for Academic & <strong>Student</strong> Affairs determines that <strong>the</strong> complaint may be reviewed,he/she will refer <strong>the</strong> complaint back to <strong>the</strong> original hearing body/<strong>of</strong>ficer or to <strong>the</strong> Community ReviewBoard for re-opening <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hearing to allow reconsideration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> original determination and/orsanction(s). The Community Review Board serves as <strong>the</strong> final level <strong>of</strong> review in <strong>the</strong> conduct matter.Except as required to explain <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> new information, a review will be limited to review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>verbatim record <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> initial hearing and supporting documents for one or more <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> followingpurposes:a. To consider new information, unavailable during <strong>the</strong> original hearing, that could be outcomedeterminative;b. To assess whe<strong>the</strong>r a material deviation from written procedures impacted <strong>the</strong> fairness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hearing;c. To decide if a sanction(s) is grossly disproportionate to <strong>the</strong> severity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fense;d. To determine that <strong>the</strong> finding does not accord with <strong>the</strong> information;e. To assess whe<strong>the</strong>r bias on <strong>the</strong> part <strong>of</strong> a conduct board member deprived <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong>impartiality.Every opportunity should be taken to return <strong>the</strong> complaint to <strong>the</strong> original hearing body/<strong>of</strong>ficer forreconsideration, where possible. The original hearing <strong>of</strong>ficer/body or <strong>the</strong> CRB may support or change adecision, increase, decrease or modify a sanction. The reviewing body will be deferential to <strong>the</strong> original decisionmaker,making changes to <strong>the</strong> finding on where <strong>the</strong>re is clear error and to <strong>the</strong> sanction only if a compellingjustification to do so exists, and a unanimous decision is reached. CRB members will be instructed by <strong>the</strong> Dean <strong>of</strong>Campus Life prior to participating in conduct proceedings.G. Community ReviewBoard Membership & AuthorityThe Community Review Board (CRB) is a group <strong>of</strong> students, faculty and administrators who serve as <strong>the</strong>final level <strong>of</strong> review in a student conduct matter. Membership on <strong>the</strong> CRB is as follows:1. Four voting student representatives appointed by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Student</strong> Government Association ExecutiveBoard, preferably no later than <strong>the</strong> third week <strong>of</strong> class in <strong>the</strong> fall semester. Representatives will beappointed from <strong>the</strong> following categories:a. One female and one male resident student;b. One female and one male commuter student;c. No more than two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four students may be seniors2. Two voting faculty representatives, on female and one male, appointed by <strong>the</strong> Faculty Senate,preferably in <strong>the</strong> spring <strong>of</strong> each academic year3. Two voting representatives from <strong>the</strong> administration, one female and one male, appointed by <strong>the</strong>President annually, preferably no later than <strong>the</strong> first three weeks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fall semester. Every effort willbe made to see that at least one representative has served previously4. The non-voting advisor to <strong>the</strong> CRB is <strong>the</strong> Vice President for Academic & <strong>Student</strong>s Affairs5. The chairperson <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CRB will be determined prior to <strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong> each hearing by a 3/4-majority vote<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Board. The chairperson will bei<strong>the</strong>r a member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> faculty or administration. The chairpersonis ineligible to vote except to break a tie vote.6. In <strong>the</strong> event <strong>of</strong> resignation, <strong>the</strong> group from which <strong>the</strong> representative came is responsible for providing areplacement as soon as possible.61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!