11.07.2015 Views

UNAIDS: The First 10 Years

UNAIDS: The First 10 Years

UNAIDS: The First 10 Years

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 6Major reasons for this were that <strong>The</strong>me Groups were relatively new and untested, and theiraccountability was not clear; the Programme Coordinating Board had limited influenceover country-level activities, and there was a lack of incentive for Cosponsors to develop agenuinely integrated approach. For example, promoting coherent, system-wide action onAIDS was still not included in the performance appraisal of <strong>UNAIDS</strong> Cosponsor staff. <strong>The</strong> keyexpectation that <strong>UNAIDS</strong> would reduce duplication of effort and ensure consistency amongUN organizations had not yet beenmet, according to the EvaluationTeam.149<strong>The</strong> team recommended highprominence for work on gender,admitting that <strong>UNAIDS</strong> couldbe criticized for not making thisa higher priority, despite someconsistent work over the years.<strong>The</strong> primary message of theEvaluation was for <strong>UNAIDS</strong> to shiftits focus on efforts to the countrylevel, where there was still a greatneed for advocacy, resourcemobilization and coordination.Followingrecommendations fromthe Evaluation, majorefforts were made to focuson country-level work.<strong>The</strong>y were plannedand overseen by MichelSidibe (third fromright, here in Cameroon),who had joined<strong>UNAIDS</strong> as Directorof the Country andRegional SupportDepartment in 2001.<strong>UNAIDS</strong>Involving a wide range of partners in the fight against AIDS is a key step in building an‘ideal’ expanded, country-level response. According to the Evaluation, an ‘ideal expandedcountry-level response’ is one in which actions would be broadly spread through bothhealth and non-health departments, sector agencies, nongovernmental organizations andcommunities; basic services and condoms would be widely available; prevention effortswould focus on populations at high risk as well as the general population and young people;voluntary and confidential testing services would be available and lead to treatment forsexually transmitted infections, opportunistic infections, action to prevent mother-to-childtransmission and treatment with antiretroviral therapy; legislation and work practice wouldalleviate stigma and discrimination; and the system would be supported by statisticalservices enabling monitoring of the epidemic’s trends.Changing the United Nations landscape in countriesIn December 2002, the recommendations of the Evaluation were accepted by <strong>UNAIDS</strong>’governing body; consequently, major efforts were made to focus on country-level work. <strong>The</strong>ywere planned and overseen by Michel Sidibe, who had joined <strong>UNAIDS</strong> as Director of theCountry and Regional Support Department in 2001, after many years working for the UnitedNations Children’s Fund in Africa and New York.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!