11.07.2015 Views

UNAIDS: The First 10 Years

UNAIDS: The First 10 Years

UNAIDS: The First 10 Years

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 8213<strong>UNAIDS</strong> ExecutiveDirector Peter Piotdistributing condomsduring the InternationalAIDS Conference inBangkok.Getty/PornchaiKittiwongsakuleventually all except the Russian Federation and the United States of America agreed toharm reduction. “China changed their policy; that was a big coup”.<strong>The</strong> draft new paper on prevention of HIV was presented to and, after fierce debate, endorsedby the 17 th PCB in June 2005. For the first time there was an internationally agreed comprehensivepolicy on HIV prevention. “This is a true milestone in the response to AIDS”, explainedPiot, “and <strong>UNAIDS</strong> was clearly fulfilling its role as the world’s reference point in AIDS policy”.Ben Plumley, Director of the <strong>UNAIDS</strong> Executive Office until March 2007, explained that thiswas really “a big success, generating approval from the PCB for the <strong>UNAIDS</strong> HIV preventionpolicy was profoundly significant for the global AIDS movement – to my mind, as importantas the ground-breaking agreements on reduced ARV [antiretrovirals] pricing in 2000. <strong>The</strong>policy is truly comprehensive and reaffirms the importance of developing ABC and harmreduction strategies. Not all PCB members were comfortable with every aspect—the USAstands out 8 , given its policy of not funding harm reduction programmes in internationalassistance. However, the key achievement was the building of consensus around <strong>UNAIDS</strong>work on those most sensitive and politically charged of HIV prevention issues”.As Piot explained, there are many ‘turf wars’ on prevention among academic HIV preventionexperts and among different agencies; “with the approved prevention policy we now havean agreed menu of what to do”.8When the Prevention Paper was agreed at the PCB meeting in June 2005, the USA made a statement that itcould not fund needle and syringe programmes because such programmes were inconsistent with currentUS law and policy. <strong>The</strong> PCB noted the statement, and that this external partner cannot be expected to fundactivities inconsistent with its own national laws and policies.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!