Thesis - Teknisk Design

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Deviation of normative pathFigure 4.6 Deviation of the normative path and media for task 3For task four, the media of the deviation of the normative path is nearly the same forthe case with visual-haptic feedback and the one with visual feedback. But fromparticipant one, three and four, the deviation of the normative path is lower in thecase with visual-haptic feedback (figure 4.6).Task 5: Go to the phone and call/video call a contact in the listTask 5Participant 1 Participant 2 Participant 3 Participant 4VH V VH V VH V VH VTime 7.97 12.29 6.62 7.97 10.25 9.09 * 5.37Speed 72.70 79.65 77.14 62.12 80.51 77.22 * 77.62Deviation ofnormativepath0.077 0.150 0.474 0.333 0.201 0.114 * 0.126Table 4.6 Performance measurements for task 50.450.40.350.30.250.20.150.10.050VHVFigure 4.7 Deviation of the normative path and media for task 5For task five, the media of the deviation of the normative path for the visual-hapticfeedback is higher than the ones for visual feedback. From participant one, thedeviation of the normative path is lower in the case with visual-haptic feedback(figure 4.4). Participant four is has not report deviation of normative path due to badrecollected data (table 4.6).DALIResults of DALI are displayed below (Table 4.7). The results are on percentage ofworkload, in first place for every aspect and finally the total.58
Participant& type oftest (VH/V)Effort ofAttentionVisualdemandAuditorydemandTactiledemandTemporaldemandParticipant 1 Participant 2 Participant 3 Participant 4VH V VH V VH V VH V5 4 16 11 5 4 5 420 17 16 14 21 21 14 200 0 2 1 0 0 0 08 1 2 5 4 3 3 01 4 0 2 1 1 3 7Interference 19 20 11 10 20 20 17 15SituationstressPercentageof workload1 1 24 19 4 4 4 054 47 71 62 55 53 46 46Table 4.7 Pondered data from DALIParticipant 12520151050Effort ofAttentionVisualdemandAuditorydemandTactiledemandTemporaldemandInterferenceVHVFigure 4.8 DALI pondered data of participant 1Participant 220151050Effort ofAttentionVisualdemandAuditorydemandTactiledemandTemporaldemandInterferenceVHVFigure 4.9 DALI pondered data of participant 259
Page 1:
Design and evaluation of hapticfeed
Page 4 and 5:
Design and evaluation of haptic fee
Page 6 and 7:
AbstractDesign and evaluation of ha
Page 8 and 9:
THE GLOBAL PARTICIPANT´S REQUIREME
Page 10 and 11:
directions, hence, a driver, while
Page 12 and 13:
these interactions are already chos
Page 14 and 15:
Haptic’s lecturesStartTouch scree
Page 16 and 17: as part of human’s skills in the
Page 18 and 19: Among the weaknesses of these devic
Page 20 and 21: Back to the general capacitive touc
Page 22 and 23: Enablesmultitouching*Cleaned withcl
Page 24 and 25: Maruyama, S. 2003). At that point,
Page 26 and 27: “TOUCH CLICK” FEEDBACKA relativ
Page 28 and 29: unlimited variations of vibrations,
Page 30 and 31: COMPARISON BETWEEN HAPTIC FEEDBACK
Page 32 and 33: 3Results from the analysis oftheore
Page 34 and 35: Figure 3.1 Requisites for an in-veh
Page 36 and 37: 3.2 SECOND QUESTION:Which haptic fe
Page 38 and 39: First step intohaptic feedbackNo ov
Page 40 and 41: The deviceThe device that has been
Page 42 and 43: herself why should the original int
Page 44 and 45: method from Immersion. This method
Page 46 and 47: create the virtual. That is related
Page 48 and 49: THE RADIOThe radio has five buttons
Page 50 and 51: is a check box. Only one check box
Page 52 and 53: EfficiencyThe efficiency is the amo
Page 54 and 55: market because the inherent usabili
Page 56 and 57: Components of usabilityHere it will
Page 58 and 59: Figure 4.2 Notional learning curve,
Page 60 and 61: o If he or she has a car?o Which br
Page 62 and 63: SpeedAffects cognitive workload?DAL
Page 64 and 65: Deviation of normative pathTask 2:
Page 68 and 69: Participant 32520151050Effort ofAtt
Page 70 and 71: Participant 3 Happiness Stimulation
Page 72 and 73: Analysis of usability study5With th
Page 74 and 75: solved, although once one individua
Page 76 and 77: Discussion6The discussion will be c
Page 78 and 79: confirmation on release. When the u
Page 80 and 81: ReferenceAlexander, J., Marshall, M
Page 82 and 83: Immersion Corporation 3. What is Mo
Page 84 and 85: Appendix IUHL Effect Library listII
Page 86 and 87: Power21 Triple Click - High Power 3
Page 88 and 89: 71 Alert 9 - High Power72 Alert 10
Page 90 and 91: 122 Engine 4 - Mid Power Infinite R
Page 92 and 93: Participant Characteristic’s Form
Page 94 and 95: Interview on LearnabilityFirst test
Page 96 and 97: ‣ Time on task ………………
Page 98 and 99: DALI QuestionnaireInstructions:Thro
Page 100 and 101: Effort of attentionorVisual demandE
Page 102 and 103: Tactile demandorInterferenceTactile
Page 104 and 105: Weighted rating:Study: …………
Page 106 and 107: XXIII
Page 108: CHALMERS UNIVERTITY OF TECHNOLOGYSE
show all

Thesis - Teknisk Design

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?