IPO GRADINGcheck the awareness level and usage of IPOgrading among investors, who subscribed toan IPO. It was a cross sectional survey indesign which was conclusive in nature. Thesampling area consisted of investors ofGandhinagar city, who subscribed to an IPO.Non-probability purposive samplingtechnique was used for exclusively collectingthe opinion of investors on IPO grading. Thesample size, of total of 100 investors wascontacted for the survey. Sampling extentmainly consisted of certain sectors ofGandhinagar like Sector-21, Sector-22,Sector-17, Sector-16, Sector-11 and Infocity.The offices of stock broker were referred assampling unit and the investors associatedwith respective broker, were chosen assampling element i.e. respondent of theresearch. The time factor for entire surveyststconstituted from 1 June, 2011 to 31 March,2012. A structured questionnaire wasprepared to elicit primary, quantitativeinformation. The questionnaire was dividedinto three sections viz., demographic details,evaluation of current investment sources andIPO grading. The reliability of the instrumentsignifies the confidence one could have in themeasurement obtained with a scale.Reliability testing was carried out usingcoefficient alpha or Cronbach's alpha, whichproduced a value of 0.899 indicating asatisfactory internal consistency reliability ofthe questionnaire.Based on the respondent's capacity tounderstand the questionnaire, personally orself administered survey was adopted inwhich respondent was handed-over thequestionnaire to fill the details. Whereas insome cases a structured interview methodwas adopted for obtaining information fromthe respondents in which, before datacollection the questions were explained inlocal dialect and to ensure precision, theresponses were duly filled by the researcherin the questionnaire. Students of ShriJairambhai Patel Institute of BusinessManagement and Computer Applications,Gandhinagar helped the researcher in thefield work. These students were explicatedthe objectives of research and were educatedfor data collection. Various online and offlinesecondary data sources like newspapers,internet, magazines, books and journals wereused for data collection. The questionnairewas prepared using conventional primaryscales of measurement. Comparative scaleslike rank order and non-comparativeitemized rating scale like likert scale wasused in the preparation of questionnaire.Dichotomous type or multiple-choice-singleresponse,or multiple-choice-multipleresponsescale (check-list) type or openended questions were incorporated in thequestionnaire to seek valuable answers fromrespondents. Collected data was edited,coded, analyzed, interpreted and presentedusing frequency distribution tables. Atunivariate level descriptive statistics likemean, median, mode, standard deviation,frequency tabulation, percentage, rankanalysis and Garrett ranking were used foranalysis. The collected data was processedfor analysis by editing, coding and entering itinto computer software- Statistical Packagefor Social Scientists (SPSS 19.0). Atmultivariate level inferential statistics wasapplied. Various parametric statistics likefactor analysis, one way ANOVA, T-test andcluster analysis was applied for analyzing thedata. Non-parametric test like one way chisquareand two way chi-square was appliedon nominal scale based data.58 <strong>Indira</strong> Management Review - Jan <strong>2013</strong>
IPO GRADINGMeaning and Significance of IPO GradingThe IPO grade represents a relative assessment of the fundamentals of that issue in relation tothe other listed equity securities in India. Such grading is assigned on a five point scale with ahigher score indicating stronger fundamentals and vice versa. It can be interpreted viz., IPOgrade 1= Poor fundamentals, IPO grade 2= Below Average fundamentals, IPO grade 3= Averagefundamentals, IPO grade 4= Above Average fundamentals and IPO grade 5= Strongfundamentals. It is introduced to provide additional information to investors in order tofacilitate their assessment on equity issues offered through an IPO. The grading fundamentallyrests on five major parameters viz., business prospects and competitive position, financialposition, management quality, corporate governance practices, compliance and litigationhistory and new project risks and prospects. IPO grading tends to be an unbiased opinion of therating agency and not SEBI (FAQ, 2012). IPO grading along with the rationale given by ratingagency is to be disclosed in the Red Herring Prospectus of the company (FAQ on IPO Grading,2012). The literary work explained that IPO grading does not affect the under-pricing of bookbuiltIPOs, moreover the transparency of book built process offers a much stronger signal to theretail investors as compared to that provided by grading (Khurshed, et al., n.d.). IPO grading wasintroduced to make additional information about unlisted companies or those without any trackrecord of their performance available to the investors, helping them assess the issue beforeinvesting and burning their fingers (Pandey, 2011). Investors should not consider IPO grading as'Buy IPO' or 'Skip IPO' recommendations (Chittorgarh, n.d.). IPO grading is only supplementinformation on the fundamentals of the IPOs being issued to the general public (Business Rediff,st2009). A company which has filed the draft offer document for its IPO with SEBI, on or after 1May, 2007, is required to obtain a grade for the IPO from at least one CRA (SEBI, n.d.)Findings of the SurveyFindings of the survey are mainly divided into three sections, which are discussed as follows.Section I- Findings of Demographic DetailsDetails pertaining to gender, educational background, occupation and yearly income areanalyzed in the following table.Table 1 Demographic Details of InvestorsParticularsGenderEducationalBackgroundOccupationYearly Income (`)PercentageMale 97Female 03Total 100Up to HSC 21Graduate 49Above Graduate 29Others 01Total 100Service 40Business 40Professional 16Others 04Total 100Up to 2,00,000 242,00,001 - 5,00,000 46Above 5,00,001 30Total 100(Source: Primary Data)<strong>Indira</strong> Management Review - Jan <strong>2013</strong> 59