11.07.2015 Views

application of real options valuation to r&d investments in ...

application of real options valuation to r&d investments in ...

application of real options valuation to r&d investments in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

simplicity. But the use <strong>of</strong> different risk-free rates could lead <strong>to</strong> more accurate result.Thirdly, the second <strong>valuation</strong> method is a simpler version <strong>of</strong> the quadranomialapproach. But due <strong>to</strong> time constra<strong>in</strong>t, the present <strong>valuation</strong> method is used.6.2 ConclusionR&D <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> pharmaceutical companies like most <strong>real</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>vestments</strong> arecharacterized by a high level <strong>of</strong> future uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty, which <strong>in</strong>fluences the present value<strong>of</strong> R&D projects is composed <strong>of</strong> technological and market uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties.The objective <strong>of</strong> this paper was <strong>to</strong> apply a richer decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>ol, i.e. the <strong>real</strong>option methodology for the <strong>valuation</strong> <strong>of</strong> multi-staged R&D projects. The paperhighlighted the ma<strong>in</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>real</strong> <strong>options</strong>, its common types, and the <strong>valuation</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>real</strong> <strong>options</strong>.A case study <strong>of</strong> Davanrik at Merck & Co. is used <strong>to</strong> illustrate the <strong>valuation</strong> <strong>of</strong> acomplex compound option, by us<strong>in</strong>g b<strong>in</strong>omial tree method. Analysis <strong>of</strong> Davanrik‘sR&D process showed that at each stage managers have the possibility (i.e. right) <strong>to</strong>cont<strong>in</strong>ue or <strong>to</strong> abandon the project <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> technological failure and/orunfavorable market conditions. Option A (for the time period 0-7) and Option B (forthe time period 7-17) can be seen as a sequential compound option, while Option A isanother sequential compound, and Option B is an American put option assum<strong>in</strong>g thatthe project can be abandoned at any time after the launch.The solutions by us<strong>in</strong>g b<strong>in</strong>omial trees approach was applied <strong>to</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d the value <strong>of</strong> thiscompound option, as it was considered as the more appropriate <strong>to</strong> valuePharmaceutical R&D projects than other option pric<strong>in</strong>g models like Black-Scholemodel. The reason is that this model accounts for both sources <strong>of</strong> uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty(technological and economic) and sequential nature <strong>of</strong> R&D projects. Furthermore, itwas identified that strategically important <strong>in</strong>formation chang<strong>in</strong>g the value <strong>of</strong>Page | 68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!