11.07.2015 Views

From Ageism to Age Equality: Addressing the Challenges ...

From Ageism to Age Equality: Addressing the Challenges ...

From Ageism to Age Equality: Addressing the Challenges ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Postal Survey of AttitudesWe conducted a postal survey of professional staff in <strong>the</strong> health and social services sec<strong>to</strong>r acrossIreland. The target population for this attitudinal assessment of ageism was any member of staffwho, through <strong>the</strong>ir working capacity, came in<strong>to</strong> contact with older people on a regular basis. Thesample frame for <strong>the</strong> research included professional staff in <strong>the</strong> acute hospital sec<strong>to</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> communityhospital sec<strong>to</strong>r and <strong>the</strong> primary care/community sec<strong>to</strong>r. Departments including Children’s Servicesand Gynaecology and Obstetrics were deemed ineligible for inclusion given <strong>the</strong>ir infrequent contactwith older people. Of <strong>the</strong> 95,679 health service providers included on <strong>the</strong> Department of Health andChildren Personnel Census of 2002, it was estimated that 70 per cent came in<strong>to</strong> contact with olderpeople on a regular basis. Therefore <strong>the</strong> target population was n=66,975 approximately. The desiredsample size for <strong>the</strong> attitudinal assessment of ageism was 2,250 health service providers. This originalsample requirement was stratified according <strong>to</strong> health board area and employment grouping on <strong>the</strong>basis of published employment figures from <strong>the</strong> Department of Health Personnel Census for 2002.34A process of consultation with health board CEOs and Direc<strong>to</strong>rs of Services for Older People was <strong>the</strong>ninitiated <strong>to</strong> acquire personnel details against those target figures identified above. On <strong>the</strong> basis ofinformation returned <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> research team, 1,182 health service staff formed <strong>the</strong> eventual sampleframe for <strong>the</strong> study. <strong>From</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample frame N=1,182 stratified quota sampling was fur<strong>the</strong>r applied<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> lists <strong>to</strong> identify 832 staff <strong>to</strong> whom postal questionnaires were issued while <strong>the</strong> remaining 250staff on <strong>the</strong> lists were invited <strong>to</strong> attend round-table discussions. Of <strong>the</strong> 832 staff sent questionnaires,698 completed returns. The response rate <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> postal questionnaire was 84 per cent. Those whoattended <strong>the</strong> discussion groups were also provided with an opportunity <strong>to</strong> complete <strong>the</strong>questionnaires and 128 staff availed of this opportunity. As a result, <strong>the</strong> overall sample size for <strong>the</strong>questionnaire was 826.The survey questionnaire included questions from <strong>the</strong> Fraboni Scale of <strong><strong>Age</strong>ism</strong> (FSA), a scale thathas been used and tested elsewhere and found <strong>to</strong> be a valid and reliable measure of ageist attitudes.Workshops with Health and Social Services Staff<strong>From</strong> <strong>the</strong> original contact list of eligible staff we invited 250 <strong>to</strong> attend semi-structured round-tablediscussions. If a member of staff was unable <strong>to</strong> or did not wish <strong>to</strong> attend, a replacement of <strong>the</strong> samegrade and from <strong>the</strong> same location was substituted. We held two workshops, each in a differentlocation, within each health board area. 7Between 6 and 19 staff from each of a range of disciplines attended each discussion session; <strong>to</strong>talattendance was 150. The purpose of <strong>the</strong>se groups was <strong>to</strong> ga<strong>the</strong>r qualitative, in-depth data on <strong>the</strong>views and attitudes of staff working with older people. We posed <strong>the</strong> following questions in <strong>the</strong>sesessions:do older people access healthcare as quickly as o<strong>the</strong>r patients?do older people receive <strong>the</strong> same quality of care as younger patients?We also explored <strong>the</strong> nature and impact of organisational fac<strong>to</strong>rs on <strong>the</strong> service provided <strong>to</strong> olderpeople.7 With <strong>the</strong> exception of <strong>the</strong> SHB area where a single discussion group in one location was requested, and <strong>the</strong> ERHA areawhere a bespoke workshop was held with medical students, house officers and registrars in Beaumont Hospital, Dublin.Conference Proceedings

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!