Conference Brochure - Society for College and University Planning

9:15 AM–10:15 AM CC-60 Civic BallroomSimilarities and Differences—Three Institutions Plan New FacilitiesPresenters: Thomas C Greene, St. Lawrence University; Arthur J.Lidsky, Dober, Lidsky, Craig and Associates; David Sullivan, SyracuseUniversity; Douglas A. Weldon, Hamilton CollegeConvener: Lynn Elgie, SSOE, Inc.Three institutions have recently planned new and renovatedscience facilities: Hamilton College, St. Lawrence University, andSyracuse University. Each institution had to establish a process;each had to justify need; each had to articulate and prioritizefacility requirements; and each had to make hard choices.This moderated discussion will focus on planning similarities,differences, tips on what works, and potential problems to avoid.Although focusing on science, the learning outcomes can beapplied to any academic project.Key Terms: Facilities Planning, Research9:15 AM–10:15 AM CC-61 Dominion SouthVendor PresentationSustainable Practicesfor University Research BuildingsPresenters: Michael Broge, Affiliated Engineers, Inc.; MichaelHaggans, Flad & Associates; Jeffrey Kaden, Indiana University atBloomingtonConvener: Jim Rogers, Rio Hondo CollegeEnergy consumption in modern research facilities averages500,000 to 1,000,000 million btu’s per square foot. Reducingbuilding energy consumption is imperative to cost efficientoperations and viability of central campus utility infrastructure.You’ll learn several ways to do this, including: alternativelaboratory mechanical ventilation concepts; highly efficient heatrecovery systems in a laboratory environment; and utilization ofDOE2 analysis as building planning tool. Indiana University’sproposed Multidisciplinary Sciences Building will be used as acase studyKey Terms: Facilities Planning, Sustainability, Research, Finance9:15 AM–10:15 AM CC-62 KentUniversities as Stimuli for Urban Revitalizationthrough Capital Expansion and Political AdvocacyPresenters: Helen F. Giles-Gee, Rowan University; Mark Rozewski,Rutgers University-CamdenConvener: Majorie Brown, Equity in Diversity CanadaCamden County College, Rowan University, Rutgers University -Camden, the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey,and the city’s two medical centers collaborated with legislatorsand the governor to stimulate economic development inCamden, New Jersey. The plan delivered $175 million forCamden’s revitalization, with up to $50 million for the institutionsas matches for capital projects. Described are econometricprojections aligned with capital plans, collaborations, constituencyengagement, and shifting missions of universities.Key Terms: Resources Planning, Relationship Building, MasterPlanning9:15 AM–10:15 AM CC-63 Dominion NorthUniversity Planning:Strategic Communication in Times of ChangePresenters: Cathy A Fleuriet and Ana Lisa Garza, Texas StateUniversity-San MarcosConvener: Alan Fish, University of Wisconsin-MadisonTexas State University-San Marcos redefined university strategicplanning and established its usefulness in shaping the university’sfuture. The session addresses 1) the “bottom up, top down”process that created department, division, and university plans,2) communication strategies used to establish buy-in, 3) steps tocreate collaborative working academic/administrative relationships,4) methods that reestablished the importance of unit anddivision strategic plans in driving university initiatives, and 5) theuniversity mission review process that assisted in framing strategicgoals.Key Terms: Academic Planning, Strategic Planning,Relationship Building9:15 AM–10:15 AM CC-64 Grand Ballroom EastInvited SessionWhy Are They Like That?Tips for Working With Higher Education ClientsPresenters: Edward H. Adelman, Massachusetts State CollegeBuilding Authority; Douglas Bencks, University of New Hampshire;John R. Benson, Cayuga ConsultantsConvener: Barbara Myerchin, Affiliated Engineers Metro DC, Inc.Colleges and universities present unique client-consultant challengesto architects, builders, and other professionals. The better youunderstand an institution’s values, culture, organizational dynamics,and multi-headed, ‘collegial’ way of doing business, the better youcan help them meet their objectives and build a strong workingrelationship. Higher education institutions are as diverse ascorporations or developers. Facilities professionals experienced inboth campus-based and consulting roles will discuss these uniqueworking relationships and offer tips to build your effectivenessworking with higher education clients.Key Terms: Facilities Planning, Relationship Building10:15 AM–10:45 AM Sheraton HallExhibit Hall10:45 AM–11:45 AM CC-22 EssexPreparing for Change:A Guide to Campus Parking AnalysisPresenter: Tryst M. Anderson, Timothy Haahs & Associates, IncConvener: Bob Ross, Brigham Young UniversityOf all campus facilities, parking receives the least amount ofplanning dollars and the most complaints from students, faculty,and staff. Learn strategies and tools that can guide you throughthe parking planning process and the development of campusparking master plans. You’ll gain insight into parking trends thatwill benefit campus parking systems.Key Terms: Facilities Planning, Parking, Master Planning22 SCUP–39 • July 17–21, 2004 • Sheraton Centre Toronto • Toronto, Ontario Canada