12.07.2015 Views

California Biomedical Industry - California Healthcare Institute

California Biomedical Industry - California Healthcare Institute

California Biomedical Industry - California Healthcare Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the private sector. NIH funding enablesuniversities and research centers toinspire their students and postdoctoralfellows to advance basic research;to build and utilize capacity in theirfacilities; and to train faculty and staffto teach future generations.Grants awarded by the NIH to<strong>California</strong> grew by 87 percent between1999 and 2004, the peak year thusfar. Since then, however, funding hasdropped back to an average of $3.2billion annually (Figure 46).No other state has garnered as muchNIH funding as <strong>California</strong> (Figure 47).In 2009, <strong>California</strong> collected NIH grantsworth more than $3.2 billion. That was38 percent more than Massachusetts,the next highest recipient.Each of the 50 states receives someNIH funding every year. <strong>California</strong> hasaveraged approximately 15 percent ofthe total over the past decade, and wasawarded 15.1 percent of the total againin 2009.The bulk of <strong>California</strong>’s NIH awardssupport research projects. In 2009,7,082 applicants were selected forfunding that totaled $3.2 billion. Yet,$119.7 million in NIH funding enabledfellowships as well as training grants— money that is critical to the ongoingtraining of faculty for tomorrow’smedical science programs.Figure 46: <strong>California</strong>’s NIH funding, fiscal years 1999-2009 ($M)Figure 25: <strong>California</strong>’s NIH funding, fiscal years 1999–2009 in millions of dollars<strong>California</strong>’s NIH Funding$4000$3500$3000$2500$2000$1500$1000$500$0199819992000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Source: National <strong>Institute</strong>s of Health, Office of Extramural Research.Note: Data excludes R&D contracts and projects funded by the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act.Figure 47: Top 10 NIH grant funding recipient states, 2009 ($M)Figure 26: Top 10 NIH grant funding recipient states<strong>California</strong>MassachusettsNew YorkPennsylvaniaTexasMarylandNorth CarolinaWashingtonIllinoisOhio$1,070$1,009$948$785$739$641$1,381$1,940$2,331Source: National <strong>Institute</strong>s of Health, Office of Extramural Research.Note: Data excludes R&D contracts and projects funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.Figure 48: <strong>California</strong>’s share of total U.S. NIH grand fundingFigure 27: <strong>California</strong>’s share of total US NIH grant funding, fiscal years 1999–2009Share of US NIH Funding17%16%15%14%15.1% 15.3% 15.0%15.3% 15.6% 16.0%14.3%$3,21415.1% 15.0%15.1% 15.1%13%1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Source: National <strong>Institute</strong>s of Health, Office of Extramural Research.Note: Data excludes R&D contracts and projects funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.68 | <strong>California</strong> <strong>Biomedical</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> 2011 Report

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!