California Biomedical Industry - California Healthcare Institute

Figure 49: California’s NIH grantsby type, 2009Grant TypeDollarAmount(millions)GrantsAwardedTotal $3,213.6 7,082Research grants $3,087.3 6,240Training grants and fellowships $119.7 813Training grants $98.5 305Fellowships $21.2 508Construction grants $1.0 2Other awards $5.5 27Figure 50: NIH Grants, total and training ($M)Figure 29: NIH Grants, total and training ($M)1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009United StatesTotal grants$12,804 $14,721 $16,701 $18,947 $21,669 $22,552 $23,117 $20,813 $21,067 $20,876 $21,483Training grants and fellowships$513 $546 $593 $657 $722 $749 $765 $758 $778 $776 $780Training as a percent of U.S. total4.0% 3.7% 3.6% 3.5% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.6% 3.7% 3.7% 3.6%CaliforniaTotal grants$1,933 $2,248 $2,497 $2,905 $3,386 $3,613 $3,301 $3,143 $3,163 $3,151 $3,214Training grants and fellowships$81 $83 $89 $97 $108 $114 $116 $111 $118 $117 $120Training as a percent of California total4.2% 3.7% 3.6% 3.3% 3.2% 3.2% 3.5% 3.5% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%Source: National Institutes of Health, Office of ExtramuralResearch.Note: Data excludes R&D contracts and projects fundedby the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.Training awards can be used to provideresearch training for young scientistswho may seek careers in biomedicaland behavioral sciences, whetherin academia or industry. They alsocan be used to establish or enhancecontinuing education programs foralready established researchers andfaculty. Training grants and fellowshipshave long been a key component in theexcellence of California’s biomedicalinstitutions’ programs.Since 1999, such funding has accountedfor an average of 3.6 percent of theoverall NIH funding. Nationally, thefunding in 2009 of 3.6 percent of thetotal was only a tenth of a percent lowerthan the previous two years and thesame as in 2006. In California, traininggrants and fellowships have made up anaverage of 3.5 percent of the state’s totalshare of NIH funding over the past 11years. In 2009, such grants comprised3.7 percent of the total, continuing athree-year streak at that level.Source: National Institutes of Health, Office of Extramural Research.Note: Data excludes R&D contracts and projects funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.Nine of the top 15 California institutions receiving NIH grants in 2009 wereuniversities — including seven of the 10 UC campuses. Stanford University wasamong the top five recipients. Of the top 10 recipients in 2009, three are in ornear San Diego. Those three (UC San Diego, the Scripps Research Institute andthe Burnham Institute for Medical Research, now the Sanford Burnham MedicalResearch Institute) make the 53rd Congressional District the largest beneficiary ofNIH funding in the state (Figure 51).Figure 30: 51: Organizations in California in California that recieve that NIH receive funding NIH (by Congressional funding (by District) congressional ($M)district), 2009 ($M)UC San Francisco (CD 12)UC Los Angeles (CD 30)UC San Diego (CD 53)Stanford University (CD 14)The Scripps Research Institute (CD 53)USC (CD 33)UC Davis (CD 1)UC Berkeley (CD 9)UC Irvine (CD 48)BIMR (CD 53)$67$114$112$175$172$206$306Source: National Institutes of Health, Office of Extramural ResearchNote: Data excludes R&D contracts and projects funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.$367$384$463California Biomedical Industry 2011 Report | 69