12.07.2015 Views

A Guide to the Repair of Historic Roofs - Dublin City Council

A Guide to the Repair of Historic Roofs - Dublin City Council

A Guide to the Repair of Historic Roofs - Dublin City Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ROOFS A GUIDE TO THE REPAIR OF HISTORIC ROOFSFULL RE-SLATINGIdeally, slipped slates and failed fixings should berepaired locally with minimal disruption <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> his<strong>to</strong>ricfabric. However, if failure is widespread, a decision mayneed <strong>to</strong> be taken on whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong> ro<strong>of</strong> needs <strong>to</strong>be fully stripped and re-covered. As a rule <strong>of</strong> thumb, ifan area <strong>of</strong> between 25 per cent and 30 per cent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>slates have slipped, cracked or are broken, or where<strong>the</strong>re is evidence <strong>of</strong> widespread failure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fixings, itmay be a more practical solution <strong>to</strong> strip <strong>the</strong> existingro<strong>of</strong> covering and re-slate <strong>the</strong> ro<strong>of</strong>, ra<strong>the</strong>r than repaironly <strong>the</strong> defective slates. An assessment should bemade as <strong>to</strong> how much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> original material can besalvaged for reuse, taking in<strong>to</strong> account <strong>the</strong>requirement for integrity and durability in <strong>the</strong>proposed ro<strong>of</strong> covering. Stripping and re-cladding <strong>the</strong>ro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> a protected structure or a building in anarchitectural conservation area may require planningpermission, and <strong>the</strong> advice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> architecturalconservation <strong>of</strong>ficer in <strong>the</strong> local authority should besought when any works are being considered.When <strong>the</strong> wholesale replacement <strong>of</strong> a his<strong>to</strong>ric ro<strong>of</strong>cladding becomes necessary, it should be carried outusing materials that match <strong>the</strong> original as closely aspossible in terms <strong>of</strong> quality, appearance andperformance. Logically this would suggest <strong>the</strong> samequarry for slate as originally used. However, this is no<strong>to</strong>ften achievable for practical reasons such as costs,availability <strong>of</strong> material and sometimes also <strong>the</strong> need <strong>to</strong>correct some design flaws in <strong>the</strong> his<strong>to</strong>ric ro<strong>of</strong>. Adecision may be made as <strong>to</strong> which is <strong>the</strong> mostimportant ro<strong>of</strong> characteristic <strong>to</strong> be maintained, if <strong>the</strong>salvaged slate previously turned cannot be reused. Theissues for consideration concern <strong>the</strong> size, colour ortexture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed slate in relation <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> originalslate. The context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> building (whe<strong>the</strong>r within aterrace or a freestanding structure) and <strong>the</strong> rarity <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> existing ro<strong>of</strong>ing material will also have a bearingon <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> an appropriate conservationstrategy for <strong>the</strong> ro<strong>of</strong> works.A major fac<strong>to</strong>r for owners and cus<strong>to</strong>dians is <strong>the</strong> costassociated with providing <strong>the</strong> full replacementcovering, versus <strong>the</strong> accumulation <strong>of</strong> incremental costsfor ongoing piecemeal repairs, insurance, scaffoldingand <strong>the</strong> like. There will come a day when <strong>the</strong> decision<strong>to</strong> re-ro<strong>of</strong> will have <strong>to</strong> be made. Compromise is <strong>of</strong>tenpart <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> final decision reached. The cost <strong>of</strong>replacement slate and scaffolding is a sizeableinvestment, which can be underestimated. A welldetailednew or re-covered ro<strong>of</strong> should be fit forpurpose for <strong>the</strong> next 40–80 years, and commonlylonger with regular maintenance and occasional localrepairs, depending on <strong>the</strong> slate used in <strong>the</strong> re-coveringand <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work. Approximately 75 per cen<strong>to</strong>f <strong>the</strong> original slate should be salvageable if <strong>the</strong> slateshave not previously been turned and are generally in asound condition. If a shared ro<strong>of</strong>ing project can beundertaken with an adjoining property <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong>scaffolding can be reduced, which makes goodeconomic sense as well as having practical benefitssuch as ensuring a seamless repair <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> ro<strong>of</strong>covering. If extensive repair work is envisaged, <strong>the</strong>propping <strong>of</strong> plaster ceilings below is essential, and <strong>the</strong>design <strong>of</strong> a temporary ro<strong>of</strong> covering and temporaryrainwater chutes should be fac<strong>to</strong>red in <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> project.STRIPPING SLATESDuring <strong>the</strong> stripping and sorting <strong>of</strong> slate from a ro<strong>of</strong>, aloss <strong>of</strong> 25 per cent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> slates can be anticipated.However, with carefully handling, loss <strong>of</strong> original slatecan be minimised. The salvaged slate should becarefully sorted according <strong>to</strong> slate type, size andthickness and left accessible for reuse. Slates are bests<strong>to</strong>red on edge in batches <strong>of</strong> twenty separated by atimber batten <strong>to</strong> facilitate ease <strong>of</strong> installation.Sometimes <strong>the</strong> s<strong>to</strong>rage <strong>of</strong> slate at ro<strong>of</strong> level isadvisable, and avoids repeated handling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> slates;however, <strong>the</strong> potential loading on <strong>the</strong> scaffold needs<strong>to</strong> be carefully considered. Clay ridge tiles should alsobe carefully salvaged and set aside for reuse wherepossible. If <strong>the</strong> original ro<strong>of</strong> was laid with diminishingslate sizes or patterns in <strong>the</strong> slates, this should benoted and recreated. A good ro<strong>of</strong>er will only strip <strong>the</strong>amount <strong>of</strong> ro<strong>of</strong> covering that can be protected aswork progresses.76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!