12.07.2015 Views

System Level Modeling and Optimization of the LTE Downlink

System Level Modeling and Optimization of the LTE Downlink

System Level Modeling and Optimization of the LTE Downlink

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. Physical Layer <strong>Modeling</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>LTE</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Level</strong> Simulationa decimation factor <strong>of</strong> six, which results in 2 · N RB SINR values for <strong>the</strong> whole <strong>LTE</strong>system b<strong>and</strong>width shown in Table 3.1. Additionally, due to <strong>the</strong> averaging nature <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> rank <strong>and</strong> precoding feedback algorithms [51, 54], at least two subcarrier SINRvalues per RB are desirable.Table 3.1.: Number <strong>of</strong> calculated SINR samples for <strong>the</strong> different <strong>LTE</strong> b<strong>and</strong>widths.Channel b<strong>and</strong>width (B channel ) [MHz] 1.4 3 5 10 15 20Number <strong>of</strong> SINR samples (2 · N RB ) 12 30 50 100 150 2003.1.1.1. Post-equalization SINR <strong>and</strong> Trace GenerationAs aforementioned, <strong>the</strong> complexity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> link quality model can be reduced byconsidering only a subset <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total post-equalization SINRs. For <strong>the</strong> calculation <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> SINR itself, a simple linear receiver, <strong>the</strong> Zero Forcing (ZF) receiver, is considered.Since system level simulations are to be used where Multi-User (MU) diversity is alsoexpected to be exploited (for single-link simulations one would ra<strong>the</strong>r employ linklevel simulations), it can be argued that for a large number <strong>of</strong> users, <strong>the</strong> ZF receiverapproaches <strong>the</strong> average performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> optimal receiver, since MU diversityeffect can compensate for poorly conditioned channel matrices [77].Assuming perfect channel knowledge, where <strong>the</strong> accent mark [ˆ] denotes a receiverestimate, <strong>the</strong> estimated received symbol vector ˆx can be expressed as()N∑intˆx = Gy = G H 0 x 0 + n + H i x i , (3.5)where G is <strong>the</strong> receive filter, which for <strong>the</strong> ZF receiver is calculated as <strong>the</strong> pseudoinverse<strong>of</strong> H <strong>and</strong> expressed asi=1H + = ( H H H ) -1H H , (3.6)where H H denotes <strong>the</strong> Hermitian transpose <strong>of</strong> H.For <strong>the</strong> cases where a spatial multiplexing (OLSM or CLSM) or TxD (based on <strong>the</strong>Alamouti STBC [41]) mode is employed, H denotes <strong>the</strong> effective channel matrix.For <strong>the</strong> SM cases, it can be calculated as <strong>the</strong> combination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> actual channelmatrix <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> linear precoder W that maps <strong>the</strong> ν transmitted symbols 2 to <strong>the</strong>N TX transmit antennas. For TxD, <strong>the</strong> precoding-equivalent operation is shown for2 In <strong>the</strong> <strong>LTE</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> simultaneously transmitted symbols is referred to as <strong>the</strong>number <strong>of</strong> layers, <strong>and</strong> is denoted as ν (see Chapter 2 <strong>and</strong> Section 2.2.2).29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!