System Level Modeling and Optimization of the LTE Downlink
System Level Modeling and Optimization of the LTE Downlink
System Level Modeling and Optimization of the LTE Downlink
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5. Performance Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Fractional Frequency Reuse in <strong>LTE</strong>5.4. Round Robin Simulation Results <strong>and</strong> Fairness MetricThe UE throughput results for <strong>the</strong> round robin scheduling case, in which <strong>the</strong> PHYresources are equally distributed among <strong>the</strong> 30 UEs in <strong>the</strong> cell, are shown in Figure5.5. Every colored dot in each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> figures represents <strong>the</strong> average UE throughput(from left to right: mean, edge <strong>and</strong> peak throughput) obtained from an <strong>LTE</strong>system level simulation with β FR <strong>and</strong> Γ thr corresponding to <strong>the</strong> values in <strong>the</strong> x- <strong>and</strong>y-axis, respectively.In <strong>the</strong> upper row, mean, edge, <strong>and</strong> peak UE throughput in Mbit/s is depicted,while <strong>the</strong> lower row exhibits throughput gains (%) respective to <strong>the</strong> reuse-1 case.Additionally in <strong>the</strong> lower row, <strong>the</strong> area corresponding to an improvement <strong>of</strong> average<strong>and</strong> edge throughput are highlighted. As previous treatments <strong>of</strong> FFR focused on anoptimization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> average <strong>and</strong> edge throughput, this aims at visualizing a similarthroughput region <strong>of</strong> interest.SINR threshold [dB]20151050Mean throughput [Mbit/s] Edge throughput [Mbit/s] Peak throughput [Mbit/s]0.90.70.50.30.176543211.81.61.41.210.80.60.40.20.9 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.170605040302010SINR threshold [dB]20151050Mean throughput gain (%) Edge throughput gain (%) Peak throughput gain (%)120501004080306020401020000.9 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.1400350300250200150100500−50Figure 5.5: <strong>LTE</strong> FFR throughput results with round robin scheduling. Mean/edge/peakthroughput (Mbit/s) over <strong>the</strong> simulated β FR <strong>and</strong> Γ thr set (top row) <strong>and</strong> throughputgain relative to <strong>the</strong> reuse-1 case (%) for <strong>the</strong> area where mean <strong>and</strong> edgethroughput gain is positive (bottom row).Just taking into account <strong>the</strong>se metrics, results indicate <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> FFR configurationsthat improve average, edge, <strong>and</strong> peak throughput, <strong>and</strong> thus <strong>of</strong>fer an apparentoverall performance increase. However, more careful examination <strong>of</strong> such cases showthat <strong>the</strong>se performance metrics do not properly reflect <strong>the</strong> throughput distribution.71