12.07.2015 Views

System Level Modeling and Optimization of the LTE Downlink

System Level Modeling and Optimization of the LTE Downlink

System Level Modeling and Optimization of the LTE Downlink

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. Physical Layer <strong>Modeling</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>LTE</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Level</strong> Simulationmodel combines <strong>the</strong> output <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> link quality model with that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> applied modulationorder <strong>and</strong> code rate <strong>and</strong> predicts <strong>the</strong> BLER <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> received TB. Ultimately,given this frame error probability, <strong>the</strong> successful or erroneous receiving <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> TB isr<strong>and</strong>omly decided via a coin toss corresponding to <strong>the</strong> BLER probability. Combinedwith <strong>the</strong> TB size throughput is <strong>the</strong>n determined, as depicted in Figure 3.11.throughputlink quality model......link performance modelBLERsubcarrier SINR vectormodulation & code rateallocated RBsTB sizeFigure 3.11: Link performance model. The output <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> link quality model is combined withinformation regarding <strong>the</strong> allocated RBs, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> employed modulation/coderate.The SINR-to-BLER mapping comprises an (n + 1)-dimensional mapping <strong>of</strong> n postequalizationsubcarrier SINRs values (γ 1 , . . . , γ n ) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> modulation <strong>and</strong> codingemployed to a single BLER value.While <strong>the</strong>oretically possible, it is in practice unfeasibly complex to obtain a mappingtable <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> possible combinations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> n SINR values to a BLER value for eachMCS. Additionally, <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong> γ varies depending on <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> RBs scheduledto <strong>the</strong> UE, with a maximum value restricted by <strong>the</strong> <strong>LTE</strong> channel b<strong>and</strong>width (seeTable 3.1).Over time, several methods to first map <strong>the</strong> sub-carrier post-equalization SINRvector, denoted as γ to an effective SINR value (γ eff ) have been proposed [88–91].While different names, such as Actual Value Interface (AVI) <strong>and</strong> Effective SINRMapping (ESM) exist, both relate to <strong>the</strong> same concept <strong>of</strong> mapping γ to an effectiveSINR value γ eff .In order to compress <strong>the</strong> SINR vector γ into a single value γ eff , Mutual InformationEffective SINR Mapping (MIESM) [90, 91] is employed, as it does not require an empiricalcalibration step such as previous methods as long as codes that perform closeto capacity are employed. The non-linear ESM averaging <strong>of</strong> MIESM is expressed asγ eff = I −1k(1N)N∑I k (γ n ) , (3.21)where N is <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SINR vector <strong>and</strong> I k <strong>the</strong> BICM capacity for <strong>the</strong> chosenmodulation at <strong>the</strong> given value γ n . The BICM capacity (I k ) for a modulationn=139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!