12.07.2015 Views

System Level Modeling and Optimization of the LTE Downlink

System Level Modeling and Optimization of the LTE Downlink

System Level Modeling and Optimization of the LTE Downlink

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5. Performance Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Fractional Frequency Reuse in <strong>LTE</strong>Figure 5.2 shows example results for <strong>the</strong> FFR configuration employing β FR = 0.75<strong>and</strong> Γ thr = 3.20 dB FFR configuration. As presented in [133], this configuration wasfound to maximize capacity density <strong>and</strong> resulted in an improvement compared to<strong>the</strong> reuse-1 case <strong>of</strong>: 8.68 % in terms <strong>of</strong> average performance, 61.81 % in edge capacitydensity, <strong>and</strong> 5.21 % in peak capacity density. As <strong>the</strong> focus <strong>of</strong> this <strong>the</strong>sis is on L2Smodeling, <strong>the</strong> details on <strong>the</strong> previous work regarding <strong>the</strong> optimization <strong>of</strong> capacitydensity have been excluded from this chapter. However, <strong>the</strong> obtained results, whichemploy a β FR -dependent SINR threshold, are shown in Figure 5.3.capacity density gain over reuse−1 [%]120100806040200−20reuse-1 referencemaximum :+61.85%+8.68%+5.21%−400 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1(edge)(peak)Figure 5.3: FFR mean, edge, <strong>and</strong> peak capacity density gains relative to reuse-1 [133].As seen in Figure 5.3, FFR can potentially be employed to simultaneously boostmean, edge, <strong>and</strong> peak throughput. However, results were based on capacity calculations,<strong>and</strong> not actual throughput. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, a homogeneous distribution <strong>of</strong>PHY resources was assumed, which may not be <strong>the</strong> case in a more realistic network,where typically proportional fair scheduling would be employed. In <strong>the</strong> remaining<strong>of</strong> this chapter, <strong>LTE</strong> FFR performance is analyzed in terms <strong>of</strong> throughput by means<strong>of</strong> <strong>LTE</strong> system level simulations, concluding that when combined with scheduling,FFR provides no tangible additional gains in terms <strong>of</strong> optimum performance.5.3. <strong>System</strong> ModelPerformance has been evaluated for a 4 × 4 MIMO antenna configuration employingCLSM. In order to be able to evaluate <strong>the</strong> complete space <strong>of</strong> FFR configurations,an exhaustive search over all possible FFR configurations has been performed. Theconfiguration parameters taken into consideration are as follows:ˆ B<strong>and</strong>width partitioning β FR : values from reuse-1 (β FR = 1) to practically reuse-3 (β FR = 0.01). As <strong>the</strong> frequency partitioning in <strong>LTE</strong> is based on RBs, <strong>the</strong>β FR frequency allocation is constrained to allocate an integer <strong>and</strong> zero-modulo-68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!