System Level Modeling and Optimization of the LTE Downlink
System Level Modeling and Optimization of the LTE Downlink
System Level Modeling and Optimization of the LTE Downlink
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3. Physical Layer <strong>Modeling</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>LTE</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Level</strong> SimulationFor an example case considering a carrier frequency <strong>of</strong> 2 000 MHz <strong>and</strong> a base stationantenna height <strong>of</strong> 15 m above average ro<strong>of</strong>top level, <strong>the</strong> propagation model formulais simplified to <strong>the</strong> well known formula [69]L = 128.1 + 37.6 · log 10 (R) , (3.15)which is shown in Figure 3.6 (left).Combining <strong>the</strong> pathloss, antenna gain, <strong>and</strong> Minimum Coupling Loss (MCL) 5 , aposition-dependant macro-scale fading map depicting <strong>the</strong> losses from a given transmittersuch as that in Figure 3.7 (left) can be obtained. The cell partitioning can bevisualized by plotting <strong>the</strong> wideb<strong>and</strong> SINR <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> strongest signal on each point, denotedas Γ <strong>and</strong> not to be confused with <strong>the</strong> post-equalization SINR. The wideb<strong>and</strong>SINR, depicted in Figure 3.6 (right), is calculated asΓ = G antenna L macro,0 P TX0. (3.16)N∑intσn 2 + L macro,l P TXmm=1The wideb<strong>and</strong> SINR, also when applicable including shadow fading, can be employedas a measure <strong>of</strong> how close a UE is to <strong>the</strong> transmit antenna relative to <strong>the</strong> interferers,<strong>and</strong> is employed as such over <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> this <strong>the</strong>sis, especially in Chapter 5.y pos [m]pathloss [dB]10008006004002000−200−400−600−800−1000−1000 −500 0 500 1000x pos [m]18016014012010080cell SINR [dB]−1000 −500 0 500 1000x pos [m]20151050−5Figure 3.7: Left: pathloss <strong>and</strong> antenna gain map in dB. Pathloss <strong>and</strong> antenna gain as inEquation (3.15) <strong>and</strong> Figure 3.6. Antenna gain <strong>of</strong> 15 dBi. Right: resulting cellwideb<strong>and</strong> SINR in dB.5 The MCL describes <strong>the</strong> minimum loss in signal between eNodeB <strong>and</strong> UE or UE <strong>and</strong> UE in <strong>the</strong>worst case <strong>and</strong> is defined as <strong>the</strong> minimum distance loss including antenna gains measured betweenantenna connectors. [69] defines it as 70 dB for urban cell deployments <strong>and</strong> 80 dB for rural celldeployments.35