- 5 -intrusion and stretching <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> crust took place, no indications for sea-floor spreading andemplacement <strong>of</strong> new oceanic crust are found (Gardosh and Druckman, 2006).<strong>The</strong> post-rift phase is associated with cooling and subsidence that was probably more intense within<strong>the</strong> basin than on <strong>the</strong> eastern margin. <strong>The</strong> Late Jurassic to Middle Cretaceous section records agradual formation <strong>of</strong> a passive-margin pr<strong>of</strong>ile and <strong>the</strong> subsequent development <strong>of</strong> a deep-marinebasin bordered by a shallow-marine shelf (Bein and Gvirtzman, 1977; Garfunkel, 1998). <strong>The</strong>passive-margin stage is characterized by recurring cycles <strong>of</strong> marine transgression and regressionassociated with relative sea-level changes (Flexer et al., 1986; Gardosh, 2002). <strong>The</strong>se are reflectedby marine onlaps, unconformity surfaces, stacking <strong>of</strong> carbonate platforms, on <strong>the</strong> basin's margin,and mass transported deposition in <strong>the</strong> basin.<strong>The</strong> convergence phase is related to <strong>the</strong> closure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Neotethyan Ocean <strong>system</strong> and <strong>the</strong> northwardmotion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Afro-Arabian plate towards Eurasia (Robertson, 1998). In <strong>the</strong> <strong>Levant</strong> region thismotion is manifested by large-scale contractional deformation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Syrian Arc fold belt (Krenkel,1924; Picard, 1959). Syrian Arc type folds are found throughout <strong>the</strong> <strong>Levant</strong> region, in an areaextending from <strong>the</strong> Western Desert <strong>of</strong> Egypt, through Israel to Lebanon and Syria. Based on surfacestudies, Walley (2001) suggested two main folding phases: Late Cretaceous and Early Tertiary. <strong>The</strong>subsurface study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Levant</strong> <strong>Basin</strong> confirmed this suggestion (Gardosh and Druckman, 2006;Gardosh et al., 2006; Bar et al., 2008; Gardosh et al., 2008). <strong>The</strong> Late Cretaceous Syrian Arc phaseI is characterized by inversion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Early Mesozoic normal faults and <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong>asymmetric, high-amplitude folds found mostly near <strong>the</strong> eastern <strong>Levant</strong> margin and fur<strong>the</strong>r inland.<strong>The</strong> Early Tertiary Syrian Arc phase II is characterized by <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> low-amplitude foldsthroughout <strong>the</strong> basin, uplifting and tilting <strong>of</strong> marginal blocks at <strong>the</strong> eastern part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> basin andfur<strong>the</strong>r inland. <strong>The</strong> contractional activity resulted with <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> a wide elevated fold belt in<strong>the</strong> eastern part <strong>of</strong> <strong>Levant</strong> basin, extending 50-70 km west <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present-day coastline (Gardosh andDruckman, 2006; Gardosh et al., 2006; Gardosh et al., 2008).Tertiary tectonic activity and sea-level falls caused intense erosion and accumulation <strong>of</strong> severalkilometers thick basin-fill (Gardosh et al., 2006; Gardosh et al., 2008). Fluvial <strong>system</strong>s flowed on<strong>the</strong> exposed shelf from elevated areas in <strong>the</strong> east, while submarine turbidity currents incised <strong>the</strong>upper slope and transported siliciclastic sediments fur<strong>the</strong>r into <strong>the</strong> basin (Druckman et al., 1995).<strong>The</strong> <strong>Oligo</strong>-<strong>Miocene</strong> and Pliocene drainage <strong>system</strong> includes several main submarine canyons andnumerous secondary conduits (Gardosh et al., 2006; Gardosh et al., 2008). Two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> canyons in
- 6 -<strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>astern part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> basin, e.g. Afiq and Ashdod, are incised several hundred meters on <strong>the</strong>continental slope. O<strong>the</strong>r canyons were less erosive and <strong>the</strong>ir flow pattern was for <strong>the</strong> most partdictated by pre-existing synclines. <strong>The</strong> Tertiary drainage <strong>system</strong> was shut-<strong>of</strong>f temporarily during <strong>the</strong>Messinian salinity event and was turned-on again during post-evaporite, latest <strong>Miocene</strong> to EarlyPliocene lowstands. A subsequent Plio-Pleistocene transgression was followed by <strong>the</strong> accumulation<strong>of</strong> a thick, siliciclastics prograding wedge along <strong>the</strong> <strong>Levant</strong> continental slope.2. Data sets2.1 Well and outcrop data<strong>The</strong> well data used in this study is based on 44 wells located in <strong>the</strong> basin or on its eastern margin(Fig. 2). Stratigraphic subdivisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se wells were, for <strong>the</strong> most part, taken from <strong>the</strong>lithostratigraphic database <strong>of</strong> oil and gas wells drilled in Israel (Table 1) compiled by Fleischer andVarshavsky (2002). Biostratigraphic data, from part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wells, were reexamined and <strong>the</strong>irstratigraphy was updated in <strong>the</strong> framework <strong>of</strong> this project (Siman-Tov, 2008a,b). Velocity data andtime-converted wire-line logs were used for correlation <strong>of</strong> stratigraphic tops with <strong>the</strong> seismic data(Table 1). <strong>The</strong> lithostratigraphy and biostratigraphy <strong>of</strong> selected wells were thoroughly reviewed andwere used to construct four detailed stratigraphic cross-sections extending from <strong>the</strong> coastal area to<strong>the</strong> eastern part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> basin (Fig. 2). Additional well and outcrop data from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Levant</strong> margin wereanalyzed and were integrated into a stratigraphic table and <strong>the</strong> marine onlap curve <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tertiarysuccession (Fig. 3).Table 1: Summary <strong>of</strong> well data used in <strong>the</strong> present study. <strong>The</strong> depth <strong>of</strong> chronostratigraphic and lithostratigraphic tops in<strong>the</strong> wells is in meters below MSL. <strong>The</strong>se depth values were used for calibration <strong>the</strong> seismic data with depth maps.Abbreviations <strong>of</strong> lithostratigraphic units are: TY - Talme Yafe Formation, Mt Sc - Mount Scopus Group, Av - AvedatGroup, BG - Bet Guvrin Formation, AshCl - Ashdod Clastics, Mav - Mavqiim Formation.Chronostrat.Base Up. Base Early Mid. BaseBoundaryCretaceous <strong>Oligo</strong>cene <strong>Miocene</strong> ? MessinianBase PlioceneSeismichorizonGreen Red Cyan Purple VioletWell names: Well Abbrv.Andromeda-1 AND1 2149/Ziqim 2127/MavAshdod-1 ASH1 2208/TY 2208 1785/BG 1710/Pattish 1690/MavAsher Yam-1 ASYM1 479/Yagur 479 479 479 479Ashqelon-2 ASHQ2 2234/TY 2040/Av 1303/BG 1120/Ziqim 1063/MavAshqelon-3 ASHQ3 2098/TY 1955/Av 1245/BG 1009/Ziqim 961/MavAtlit-1 Deep ATLT1 45/Negba 45 45 45 45Bat Yam-1 BYAM1 2432/TY 2197/Av 2087/BG 1479/AshCl 1479/NPVulcBravo-1 BRV1 2939Daliyya 2197/Av 1627/BG 1380/Ziqim 1350/Mav
- Page 1 and 2: The Oligo-Miocene deepwater system
- Page 4 and 5: ITable of contentPageAbstract …
- Page 6: IIIFigure 16: Depth map of the base
- Page 9 and 10: - 2 -Oligo-Miocene sands were depos
- Page 11: - 4 -The discoveries of the early 2
- Page 15 and 16: - 8 -Legend2D survey A2D survey B2D
- Page 17 and 18: - 10 -2.2 Seismic dataThe seismic i
- Page 19 and 20: - 12 -conditions, and possibly sedi
- Page 21 and 22: - 14 -3.3.2 Lower Oligocene sedimen
- Page 23 and 24: - 16 -Druckman, 2006; Bertoni and C
- Page 25 and 26: - 18 -aSWNETWT (ms)bSWHanaha-1NEMav
- Page 27 and 28: - 20 -aNWSETWT (ms)bYam West-1Ziqim
- Page 29 and 30: - 22 -WETWT (ms)aYam Yafo-1multiple
- Page 31 and 32: - 24 -NW SEaYam West-2Plio-Pleistoc
- Page 33 and 34: - 26 -A third incision surface, mar
- Page 35 and 36: - 28 -4.2.2 Deep, central part of t
- Page 37 and 38: - 30 -10812591167Figure 13: Time st
- Page 39 and 40: - 32 -10812591167Figure 15: Time st
- Page 41 and 42: - 34 -HaifaQishon302829AtlitCaesare
- Page 43 and 44: - 36 -Figure 19: Depth map on the t
- Page 45 and 46: - 38 -SW NEAfiq Canyon Ashdod Canyo
- Page 47 and 48: - 40 -The Beer Sheva-Afiq Canyon lo
- Page 49 and 50: - 42 -SWNE SW NE SW NEPlio-Pleistoc
- Page 51 and 52: - 44 -SWHanaha-1NE SW NE SW Hof Ash
- Page 53 and 54: - 46 -BMSL1400m.1500200025003000Han
- Page 55 and 56: - 48 -WE W E NW SEPlio-PleistoceneC
- Page 57 and 58: - 50 -W EPlio-PleistoceneMessinian
- Page 59 and 60: - 52 -S NPlio-PleistoceneM.-U. Mioc
- Page 61 and 62: Figure 31: Stratigraphic section al
- Page 63 and 64:
- 56 -W ELower-slope and basin floo
- Page 65 and 66:
- 58 -SlopeSusita + En-GevsandsShel
- Page 67 and 68:
- 60 -In the Hadera Canyon the seis
- Page 69 and 70:
- 62 -Additional mechanisms for tra
- Page 71 and 72:
- 64 -The existence of channel fill
- Page 73 and 74:
- 66 -SlopePartly Uplifted ?Hordos
- Page 75 and 76:
- 68 -Oligo-Miocene sands were depo
- Page 77 and 78:
- 70 -Druckman, Y., Conway, B.H., E
- Page 79 and 80:
- 72 -Neev, D., 1960, A pre-Neogene