- 59 -Hannah-1MessinianM. <strong>Miocene</strong>U. TortonianLegend<strong>Oligo</strong>cene-L. <strong>Miocene</strong>EvaporitesClaystoneSandstoneEarlyCretaceousLimestoneFigure 34: <strong>Oligo</strong>-<strong>Miocene</strong> reservoir elements in <strong>the</strong> Hannah-1 well at <strong>the</strong> western part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ashdod Canyon. Highamplitudeevents on <strong>the</strong> seismic pr<strong>of</strong>ile correlate to thin sandstone and carbonate interval, interpreted as channel fillwithin <strong>the</strong> <strong>Oligo</strong>cene and Middle to Late <strong>Miocene</strong> canyons. Location is as in Figure 24 (after Samedan, 2003).
- 60 -In <strong>the</strong> Hadera Canyon <strong>the</strong> seismic data show several positive, high-amplitude reflections that onlap<strong>the</strong> canyon walls (Fig. 35). Amplitude extraction map <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se events reveal linear featureswith maximum amplitude values (70-80) along <strong>the</strong> canyon. <strong>The</strong> high-amplitude event mayrepresent a channel-levee complex where <strong>the</strong> maximum amplitudes are <strong>the</strong> coarser-grained, sandyportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> channel fill.No confined settings were observed in <strong>the</strong> seismic records in <strong>the</strong> deep part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> basin, west <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>elevated incised fold belt. None<strong>the</strong>less, high-amplitude seismic events, which are observed at <strong>the</strong>lower part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> section near <strong>the</strong> distal outlets <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> main canyons (Fig. 11, left side at about 4.7sec), may be associated with unconfined setting <strong>of</strong> sheet sands and basin floor fans.A 17 m thick sand interval <strong>of</strong> lower <strong>Miocene</strong> age was encountered in <strong>the</strong> Gaza-1 borehole, in <strong>the</strong>Afiq Canyon, where it crosses <strong>the</strong> present coast line (Fig. 33). It was interpreted as a channel filldeposits and may represent <strong>the</strong> proximal tail <strong>of</strong> much more extensive accumulation fur<strong>the</strong>rdownstream <strong>the</strong> Afiq Canyon. In <strong>the</strong> unconfined setting, west <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> outlet <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Afiq Canyon into<strong>the</strong> <strong>Levant</strong> deep basin, <strong>the</strong> seismic records show high-amplitude events below <strong>the</strong> cyan horizon,(Fig. 11, central part at about 3.7 sec). <strong>The</strong>se seismic events may represent sheet sands generated bybasin floor fans.Notably, continental clastic sediments started to accumulate in proximal inland areas in Early<strong>Oligo</strong>cene times. <strong>The</strong> Hazeva Group, several hundred meters thick in <strong>the</strong> Negev, started toaccumulate before 20 m.y. (Calvo and Bartov, 2001). In <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn part <strong>of</strong> Israel, <strong>the</strong> mixedcarbonates-clastic deposites <strong>of</strong> Hao’n and Nukev Formations and <strong>the</strong> continental sand deposits <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> En-Gev Member (Susita Formation) were deposited during <strong>the</strong> Early <strong>Oligo</strong>cene and Early<strong>Miocene</strong> (Buchbinder et al., 2005). <strong>The</strong> deposition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hordos sands in <strong>the</strong> Galilee and <strong>the</strong> GolanHeights was initiated before 17 m.y. (Shaliv, 1991).Shaliv (1991) suggested that <strong>the</strong> similarities between <strong>the</strong> En-Gev sands and <strong>the</strong> continental deposits<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Damascus basin show that <strong>the</strong> two sites are, in fact, parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same basin. All <strong>the</strong>se clasticoccurrences strongly suggest <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> a widespread source for siliciclastics both in <strong>the</strong>sou<strong>the</strong>rn and <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country (Fig. 33). Clastic deposits could have beentransported into <strong>the</strong> basin through <strong>the</strong> Afiq and Ashdod canyons, in south and central Israel, andthrough yet undefined conduits in nor<strong>the</strong>rn Israel during <strong>the</strong> <strong>Oligo</strong>cene to Early <strong>Miocene</strong> time span(Figs. 3 and 33).
- Page 1 and 2:
The Oligo-Miocene deepwater system
- Page 4 and 5:
ITable of contentPageAbstract …
- Page 6:
IIIFigure 16: Depth map of the base
- Page 9 and 10:
- 2 -Oligo-Miocene sands were depos
- Page 11 and 12:
- 4 -The discoveries of the early 2
- Page 13 and 14:
- 6 -the southeastern part of the b
- Page 15 and 16: - 8 -Legend2D survey A2D survey B2D
- Page 17 and 18: - 10 -2.2 Seismic dataThe seismic i
- Page 19 and 20: - 12 -conditions, and possibly sedi
- Page 21 and 22: - 14 -3.3.2 Lower Oligocene sedimen
- Page 23 and 24: - 16 -Druckman, 2006; Bertoni and C
- Page 25 and 26: - 18 -aSWNETWT (ms)bSWHanaha-1NEMav
- Page 27 and 28: - 20 -aNWSETWT (ms)bYam West-1Ziqim
- Page 29 and 30: - 22 -WETWT (ms)aYam Yafo-1multiple
- Page 31 and 32: - 24 -NW SEaYam West-2Plio-Pleistoc
- Page 33 and 34: - 26 -A third incision surface, mar
- Page 35 and 36: - 28 -4.2.2 Deep, central part of t
- Page 37 and 38: - 30 -10812591167Figure 13: Time st
- Page 39 and 40: - 32 -10812591167Figure 15: Time st
- Page 41 and 42: - 34 -HaifaQishon302829AtlitCaesare
- Page 43 and 44: - 36 -Figure 19: Depth map on the t
- Page 45 and 46: - 38 -SW NEAfiq Canyon Ashdod Canyo
- Page 47 and 48: - 40 -The Beer Sheva-Afiq Canyon lo
- Page 49 and 50: - 42 -SWNE SW NE SW NEPlio-Pleistoc
- Page 51 and 52: - 44 -SWHanaha-1NE SW NE SW Hof Ash
- Page 53 and 54: - 46 -BMSL1400m.1500200025003000Han
- Page 55 and 56: - 48 -WE W E NW SEPlio-PleistoceneC
- Page 57 and 58: - 50 -W EPlio-PleistoceneMessinian
- Page 59 and 60: - 52 -S NPlio-PleistoceneM.-U. Mioc
- Page 61 and 62: Figure 31: Stratigraphic section al
- Page 63 and 64: - 56 -W ELower-slope and basin floo
- Page 65: - 58 -SlopeSusita + En-GevsandsShel
- Page 69 and 70: - 62 -Additional mechanisms for tra
- Page 71 and 72: - 64 -The existence of channel fill
- Page 73 and 74: - 66 -SlopePartly Uplifted ?Hordos
- Page 75 and 76: - 68 -Oligo-Miocene sands were depo
- Page 77 and 78: - 70 -Druckman, Y., Conway, B.H., E
- Page 79 and 80: - 72 -Neev, D., 1960, A pre-Neogene