- 13 -represents <strong>the</strong> highstand progradation phase <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Late Eocene cycle. Markedly, <strong>the</strong> hemi-pelagicfacies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Late Eocene is primarily uniform, both inland and far <strong>of</strong>fshore.Unlike o<strong>the</strong>r locations, <strong>the</strong> Eocene succession in <strong>the</strong> synclinorial area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Golan Heights show anuninterrupted Early to Late Eocene biostratigraphic succession from P9 to P15 (Michelson andLipson-Benitah, 1986). <strong>The</strong>refore, <strong>the</strong> upper Eocene (P15) chalk <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Golan Heights was regardedby Michelson and Lipson-Benitah (1986) as <strong>the</strong> Maresha Formation (Fig. 3).3.3 Lower <strong>Oligo</strong>cene to lower <strong>Miocene</strong> succession3.3.1 Lower <strong>Oligo</strong>cene erosion phaseA major unconformity is found between <strong>the</strong> Late Eocene and Early <strong>Oligo</strong>cene depositional cycles(Fig. 3). It could have been related to eustatic sea-level fall at 34 m.y. (shown by Haq et al., 1988and Miller et al., 2005). Local uplift movements associated with Syrian Arc contraction or withdoming <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Arabian Shield prior to <strong>the</strong> rifting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Red Sea (Garfunkel, 1988) fur<strong>the</strong>rintensified <strong>the</strong> erosional processes. A regional unconformity surface (peneplain) developed in <strong>the</strong>Negev and <strong>the</strong> Judea Mountains (Picard, 1951; Garfunkel and Horowitz, 1966). Zilberman (1992,1993) named this unconformity “<strong>the</strong> upper erosion surface” and pointed out that it postdates upperEocene deposits and predates <strong>Miocene</strong> continental deposits <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hazeva Group. <strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong>this erosion surface in <strong>the</strong> Judean hills indicates that <strong>the</strong> anticlinorial backbone <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country hadalready been emerged at that time. (Bar et al., 2006).Buchbinder et al. (2005) related <strong>the</strong> first incision <strong>of</strong> canyons in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Levant</strong> margin to <strong>the</strong> Early/Late<strong>Oligo</strong>cene boundary (Fig. 3). Druckman et al. (1995) associated it with P19 - ampliapertura Zone(Fig. 3). <strong>The</strong> main incision in <strong>the</strong> Ashdod-1 borehole (see Figure 7 in Buchbinder et al., 2005) mayhave been occurred at <strong>the</strong> bottom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> "Lower Sands" ("Ashdod clastics" in Fig. 3), i.e., ei<strong>the</strong>rbetween P19/P20, or within <strong>the</strong> P20, P21 zones (Fig. 3). Alternatively, it may be placed at <strong>the</strong> base<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower <strong>Oligo</strong>cene (P18) conglomerates. In <strong>the</strong> Hanna-1 borehole, which is located at <strong>the</strong> distalpart <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ashdod Canyon, <strong>the</strong> base <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> canyon fill was dated as P19 (Micro-Strat, 2003). <strong>The</strong>diversified ages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> entrenchment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ashdod Canyon are obviously <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> poorbiostratigraphic resolution, because <strong>of</strong> intense contamination and redeposition in <strong>the</strong> cuttingsamples. Never<strong>the</strong>less, for <strong>the</strong> sake <strong>of</strong> convenience and simplicity in <strong>the</strong> interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>seismic data, <strong>the</strong> initial phase <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> canyon's incision was placed at <strong>the</strong> P19 biozone (Fig. 3, seechapter 4).
- 14 -3.3.2 Lower <strong>Oligo</strong>cene sedimentsPatchy outcrops <strong>of</strong> lowermost <strong>Oligo</strong>cene sediments (zone P18 in Fig. 3) are scarce and are sparselyspread from <strong>the</strong> Golan to <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Negev. <strong>The</strong>y are more common in wells along <strong>the</strong>Mediterranean coastal plain and <strong>of</strong>fshore areas, where <strong>the</strong>y are included in <strong>the</strong> lower part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> BetGuvrin Formation (Fig. 3). <strong>The</strong>se sediments invariably consist <strong>of</strong> deep-water pelagic marly chalks,and <strong>the</strong>ir aerial distribution largely follows <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> upper Eocene deposits, except for<strong>the</strong>ir absence in <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Negev (Buchbinder et al., 2005). <strong>The</strong>se units thus indicate that most<strong>of</strong> Israel, except <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn and central Negev, was covered by sea in earliest <strong>Oligo</strong>cene times.3.3.3 Upper Rupelian- lower Chattian transported clastics lowstand and carbonate wedgeSediments <strong>of</strong> P19-P21 zones (ampliapertura to opima opima, Fig. 3) have a limited inlanddistribution. However, sediments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> opima opima zone penetrate more inland to <strong>the</strong> LowerShefela region (Lakhish Formation), characterizing <strong>of</strong> slumped blocks, debris flows and occasionalsandy calcareous turbidites (Lakhish area). <strong>The</strong>se mass transported sediments are covered by a fewmeters <strong>of</strong> in situ large-foraminiferal limestone representing a lowstand prograding wedge(Buchbinder et al., 2005). More than 300 m <strong>of</strong> sand and conglomerates <strong>of</strong> this phase werepenetrated in <strong>the</strong> Ashdod wells in <strong>the</strong> Coastal Plain (Fig. 3).3.3.4 Upper <strong>Oligo</strong>cene (P22) - lower <strong>Miocene</strong> (N4) cycles<strong>The</strong>se cycles represent <strong>the</strong> last major <strong>Oligo</strong>cene transgressions (Fig. 3). <strong>The</strong>y are separated by anerosional unconformity <strong>of</strong> moderate magnitude. <strong>The</strong> onlap <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Early <strong>Miocene</strong> cycle; i.e. <strong>the</strong>upper Ha'on Member (Susita Formation), reached <strong>the</strong> Golan area across <strong>the</strong> Rift Valley (Fig. 3,Buchbinder et al., 2005). However, <strong>the</strong>ir hemi-pelagic sediments were largely eroded from <strong>the</strong> hillybackbone <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country. <strong>The</strong> facies is ubiquitously pelagic or hemi-pelagic (Bet Guvrin type),except in <strong>the</strong> most proximal outcrops in <strong>the</strong> Golan Heights.3.3.5 <strong>The</strong> Burdigalian lowstand (N5-N7)Sediments <strong>of</strong> this interval are limited to <strong>the</strong> Coastal Plain and <strong>of</strong>fshore area. Canyon incision wasrenewed and mass transported deposits occasionally accumulated, as exemplified by <strong>the</strong> Gaza sands(Fig. 3; Martinotti, 1973).3.3.6 Lowermost Middle <strong>Miocene</strong> cycle (Ziqlag Formation)This cycle is unique in <strong>the</strong> sense that it shows a development <strong>of</strong> a carbonate platform in times <strong>of</strong>dominant fine siliciclastic deposition (Ziqlag Formation, Fig. 3) unconformably abutting <strong>the</strong>
- Page 1 and 2: The Oligo-Miocene deepwater system
- Page 4 and 5: ITable of contentPageAbstract …
- Page 6: IIIFigure 16: Depth map of the base
- Page 9 and 10: - 2 -Oligo-Miocene sands were depos
- Page 11 and 12: - 4 -The discoveries of the early 2
- Page 13 and 14: - 6 -the southeastern part of the b
- Page 15 and 16: - 8 -Legend2D survey A2D survey B2D
- Page 17 and 18: - 10 -2.2 Seismic dataThe seismic i
- Page 19: - 12 -conditions, and possibly sedi
- Page 23 and 24: - 16 -Druckman, 2006; Bertoni and C
- Page 25 and 26: - 18 -aSWNETWT (ms)bSWHanaha-1NEMav
- Page 27 and 28: - 20 -aNWSETWT (ms)bYam West-1Ziqim
- Page 29 and 30: - 22 -WETWT (ms)aYam Yafo-1multiple
- Page 31 and 32: - 24 -NW SEaYam West-2Plio-Pleistoc
- Page 33 and 34: - 26 -A third incision surface, mar
- Page 35 and 36: - 28 -4.2.2 Deep, central part of t
- Page 37 and 38: - 30 -10812591167Figure 13: Time st
- Page 39 and 40: - 32 -10812591167Figure 15: Time st
- Page 41 and 42: - 34 -HaifaQishon302829AtlitCaesare
- Page 43 and 44: - 36 -Figure 19: Depth map on the t
- Page 45 and 46: - 38 -SW NEAfiq Canyon Ashdod Canyo
- Page 47 and 48: - 40 -The Beer Sheva-Afiq Canyon lo
- Page 49 and 50: - 42 -SWNE SW NE SW NEPlio-Pleistoc
- Page 51 and 52: - 44 -SWHanaha-1NE SW NE SW Hof Ash
- Page 53 and 54: - 46 -BMSL1400m.1500200025003000Han
- Page 55 and 56: - 48 -WE W E NW SEPlio-PleistoceneC
- Page 57 and 58: - 50 -W EPlio-PleistoceneMessinian
- Page 59 and 60: - 52 -S NPlio-PleistoceneM.-U. Mioc
- Page 61 and 62: Figure 31: Stratigraphic section al
- Page 63 and 64: - 56 -W ELower-slope and basin floo
- Page 65 and 66: - 58 -SlopeSusita + En-GevsandsShel
- Page 67 and 68: - 60 -In the Hadera Canyon the seis
- Page 69 and 70: - 62 -Additional mechanisms for tra
- Page 71 and 72:
- 64 -The existence of channel fill
- Page 73 and 74:
- 66 -SlopePartly Uplifted ?Hordos
- Page 75 and 76:
- 68 -Oligo-Miocene sands were depo
- Page 77 and 78:
- 70 -Druckman, Y., Conway, B.H., E
- Page 79 and 80:
- 72 -Neev, D., 1960, A pre-Neogene