12.07.2015 Views

Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics

Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics

Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

66 3 Generalizing What We LearntLet us make, at this point, a mathematical digression. If, to the relation ln(xy) =ln x +ln y, we add relations (3.103) and (3.104), we feel tempted to find out whethera further generalized logarithmic function exists which would elegantly unify all ofthem in the formln q,q ′(x ⊗ q y) = ln q,q ′ x ⊕ q ′ ln q,q ′ y . (3.107)It turns out that it does exist, and is given by [187]ln q,q ′ x ≡ ln q ′ e ln q x = 1 [ ( 1 − q′ (exp x 1−q − 1 )) ]− 1 . (3.108)1 − q ′ 1 − qThe relations ln q,1 x = ln 1,q x = ln q x are easily recovered by evaluatingEq. (3.108) in the limits q → 1 and q ′ → 1. From Eq. (3.108), the inverse functioneq,q x ′ can be easily obtained as well.Finally, let us end by mentioning some related open problems. Does a generalizedsum x ⊕ (q) y exist such as a q-generalized distributivity like the followingholds?x ⊗ q (y ⊕ (q) z) = (x ⊗ q y) ⊕ (q) (x ⊗ q z) . (3.109)Could it be ⊕ (q) =⊕ f (q) , f being some specific function?Analogously, does a generalized product x ⊗ (q) y exist such as a q-generalizeddistributivity like the following holds?x ⊗ (q) (y ⊕ q z) = (x ⊗ (q) y) ⊕ q (x ⊗ (q) z) . (3.110)Could it be ⊗ (q) =⊗ g(q) , g being some specific function?These questions are presently open. However, preliminary results suggest thatno equality (3.109) can generically exist with a generalized sum that would beassociative.3.3.4 Extensivity of S q – Effective Number of StatesSuppose we are composing the discrete states of two subsystems A and B, whosetotal numbers of states are, respectively, W A ≥ 1 and W B ≥ 1. To be more specific,W A (W B ) is the total number of states of A (B) whose associated probability is notzero. The total number of states of the system A + B is thenW A+B = W A W B . (3.111)Let us now denote by W effA+Bthe effective number of states of the system A + B,where by effective we mean the number of states whose joint probability is not zero.It will in general be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!