Project Management Guidelines - National Transport Authority

The elected members considered the Planning Report, and the potential solutions above. The Councilapproved the Part VIII subject to the following changes:1. The facility should avoid or minimise the use of kerbs;2. The drainage should be consistent with sustainable design practice e.g. SUDS; and3. Pedestrian priority should be signed at all entrances (as proposed) and also re-iterated throughsymbols or words on the track surface.Implications of Planning Process:1. Kerbs and Drainage- the facility was designed with kerbs at the request of the roads department.However, the original (preferred) design included for a kerb-free French Drain system. This will bepicked up in the detailed design stage. Cost neutral. No delay is anticipated.2. Lighting system already has auto-off functionality. However, some work required to link counters asinputs to lighting system. (Alternative is use of PIR detectors along route.) Some minor costs (€1,000).No time delay anticipated.3. Signage, lines, etc. Cost insignificant. No time delay anticipated.S. CliffordSenior Exec. PlannerProject Cost(Complete relevant column (Feasibility Working Cost at Phase 0 or Phase 1; Prelimary Cost Estimate at Phase 2or 3; Total Scheme Budget for all later phases).(The total estimate in each case should be inclusive of appropriate risk and contingency allowance and shouldrepresent the Sponsoring Agency’s best estimate at that stage of the overall budget required to deliver theproject.)Feasibility Working CostPreliminary CostEstimate*Total SchemeBudget*Design €60,000 Design Design €59,800Construction/Implementation €370,000Construction/ImplementationConstruction/Implementation €414,000Construction supervision €20,000 Construction supervision Construction supervision €18,400Land/Property €0 Land/Property Land/Property €0Other €0 Other Other €5,750Total €450,000 Total Total €497,950Date of Estimate: 14/09/2010 Date of Estimate: Date of Estimate: 28/01/11* For these estimates, please include a proposed expenditure profile for the delivery of the project.78