12.07.2015 Views

On the real effects of private equity investment: evidence from new ...

On the real effects of private equity investment: evidence from new ...

On the real effects of private equity investment: evidence from new ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.3 US industry-level entry dataAs a benchmark for <strong>new</strong> business incorporation into an industry, we use data on …rm entryin <strong>the</strong> respective NACE rev. 1.1 2-digit industry in <strong>the</strong> US, <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dun and Bradstreetdatabase <strong>of</strong> over 7 million corporations over <strong>the</strong> period 1998-1999.The methodology <strong>of</strong>using US industry characteristics as a benchmark in cross-country cross-industry studieswas …rst introduced by Rajan and Zingales (1998), who argued that <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong>US industries in terms <strong>of</strong> external …nance usage can be viewed as <strong>the</strong> industries’"natural"or "technological" composition, because US …nancial markets are relatively friction-free,compared with o<strong>the</strong>r …nancial markets around <strong>the</strong> world, including most industrial countries.The methodology has been used, among o<strong>the</strong>rs, by Beck et al.(2008) to calculate <strong>the</strong>"natural" share <strong>of</strong> small …rms in an industry, by Claessens and Laeven (2003) to calculate<strong>the</strong> industry’s "natural" usage <strong>of</strong> intangibles, and most recently by Klapper et al. (2006) tocalculate <strong>the</strong> "natural" rate <strong>of</strong> business incorporation, which we use in this paper.It needs to be pointed out that proxying <strong>the</strong> "natural" rate <strong>of</strong> industry entry by entryin <strong>the</strong> respective industry in <strong>the</strong> US is somewhat arbitrary. It relies on <strong>the</strong> assumption thatbureaucratic barriers to entry are lower <strong>the</strong>re than in any country in Europe, and that <strong>the</strong>cost <strong>of</strong> …nancial intermediation and start-up …nancing is su¢ ciently lower in <strong>the</strong> US than inEurope as a whole. This technique does not argue that industries in <strong>the</strong> US have achieved<strong>the</strong> …rst best in terms <strong>of</strong> entry, but that <strong>the</strong> …nancial and regulatory environment is relativelymore conducive to entry than <strong>the</strong> countries in our sample. For example, while entry costs in<strong>the</strong> US are around 0.5% <strong>of</strong> per capita GNP, in our sample <strong>of</strong> European countries <strong>the</strong>y areon average around 20%; and while venture capital <strong>investment</strong> in <strong>the</strong> US in 1998-1999 wasabout 0.2% <strong>of</strong> GDP, it stood at 0.1% <strong>of</strong> GDP in <strong>the</strong> UK, 0.05% <strong>of</strong> GDP in France and 0.02%<strong>of</strong> GDP in Germany, with <strong>the</strong>se three countries receiving <strong>the</strong> lion share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>private</strong> <strong>equity</strong><strong>investment</strong> in Europe. Certainly, <strong>the</strong> entry costs in <strong>the</strong> US are non-zero, and it is impossibleto know if <strong>the</strong> optimal amount <strong>of</strong> venture capital <strong>investment</strong> is not much larger than 0.2%<strong>of</strong> GDP, but what matters is that <strong>the</strong>se characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> US business environment aresuperior than in <strong>the</strong> countries in our sample.For robustness purposes, however, similar14 ECBWorking Paper Series No 1078August 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!