12.07.2015 Views

The Calvinism Debate - Way of Life Literature

The Calvinism Debate - Way of Life Literature

The Calvinism Debate - Way of Life Literature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and believing on His name. To believe and receive is an act <strong>of</strong>the will. What John 1:13 means is that the new birth is not amatter <strong>of</strong> man saving himself by his own will and works.Salvation is a miracle <strong>of</strong> God’s power. See 1 Peter 1:3. It is notsomething that man can work up and perform by his ownwill. It is God who shines light into the soul and gives lifeunto the dead and imparts the Holy Spirit. at salvation isnot by man’s will but by God’s does not mean that mancannot believe in Christ until he is irresistibly drawn andconverted. In fact, this passage refutes <strong>Calvinism</strong> by teachingthat salvation is given to those who believe on Christ.1 Peter 1:2--“Elect according to the foreknowledge <strong>of</strong>God the Father, through sanctification <strong>of</strong> the Spirit, untoobedience and sprinkling <strong>of</strong> the blood <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ:Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied.”is verse says God’s election is based on Hisforeknowledge. e standard Calvinist position onforeknowledge is basically to do away with it by making it thesame as forewill, doing away completely with the possibilitythat God’s election could have anything to do with what Heforesees. But the word that Peter uses for “foreknowledge” is aword that means simply that God foreknew what wouldhappen. It is the Greek word “prognosis,” which is a word stillused commonly in English. When a doctor gives theprognosis <strong>of</strong> a disease, he describes the normal progression <strong>of</strong>the disease. He basically is able to tell the future because heknows beforehand what will happen. e doctrine <strong>of</strong>“foreknowledge,” if not redefined by <strong>Calvinism</strong>, goes a longway, though not all <strong>of</strong> the way, toward explaining the mystery<strong>of</strong> how God could elect, but man could choose. ere isdoubtless more to election than foreknowledge and we do notclaim to be able to explain these things fully, but the factremains that God’s Word teaches us that foreknowledge isinvolved and it cannot be redefined to mean “foreordination.”In his attempt to redefine “foreknowledge” and to mold itinto “foreordination,” the Calvinist commonly uses Acts 2:23,93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!