12.07.2015 Views

Thought and Reality in Hegel's System

Thought and Reality in Hegel's System

Thought and Reality in Hegel's System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Thought</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Reality</strong> <strong>in</strong> Hegel’s <strong>System</strong>/21For, <strong>in</strong> this mean<strong>in</strong>g of thought, experience <strong>and</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g experience aresynonymous terms.There are various passages <strong>in</strong> which Hegel emphasizes this aspectof thought by <strong>in</strong>sist<strong>in</strong>g that thought is not one mental faculty amongothers coord<strong>in</strong>ate with it, but that it is the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of universality <strong>in</strong>m<strong>in</strong>d <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>cludes with<strong>in</strong> itself the other so-called mental faculties asessential elements. In his lectures on the History of Philosophy occurs acriticism of Kant which is very suggestive <strong>in</strong> this connection: “WithKant the th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> sensuousness are both someth<strong>in</strong>gparticular, <strong>and</strong> they are merely united <strong>in</strong> an external, superficial way,just as a piece of wood <strong>and</strong> a leg might be bound together with a cord.” 41Aga<strong>in</strong>st any such atomistic conception of the m<strong>in</strong>d Hegel would <strong>in</strong>sist:“Even our sense of the m<strong>in</strong>d’s liv<strong>in</strong>g unity naturally protests aga<strong>in</strong>st anyattempt to break it up <strong>in</strong>to different faculties, forces, or, what comes tothe same th<strong>in</strong>g, activities, conceived as <strong>in</strong>dependent of each other.” 42But he would go further than this. Not only does he ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> that thoughtis not one element <strong>in</strong> an aggregate of disparate parts; he also urges thatthought is rather the very life of the one organic whole which we callm<strong>in</strong>d, “its very unadulterated self.” 43 For example, <strong>in</strong> the smaller Logiche asserts that thought is present <strong>in</strong> every perception <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> every mentalactivity. 44 “We simply cannot escape from thought,” he elsewheresays, “it is present <strong>in</strong> sensation, <strong>in</strong> cognition, <strong>and</strong> knowledge, <strong>in</strong> the<strong>in</strong>st<strong>in</strong>cts, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> volition, <strong>in</strong> so far as these are attributes of a humanm<strong>in</strong>d.” 45 In the Philosophy of Right we read: “Spirit <strong>in</strong> general is thought,<strong>and</strong> by thought man is dist<strong>in</strong>guished from the animal. But we must notimag<strong>in</strong>e that man is on one side th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> on another side will<strong>in</strong>g, asthough he had will <strong>in</strong> one pocket <strong>and</strong> thought <strong>in</strong> another. Such an idea isva<strong>in</strong>. The dist<strong>in</strong>ction between thought <strong>and</strong> will is only that between atheoretical <strong>and</strong> a practical relation. They are not two separate faculties.The will is a special way of th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g; it is thought translat<strong>in</strong>g itself <strong>in</strong>toreality; it is the impulse of thought to give itself reality.” 46 The conclusionof the whole matter is, that “<strong>in</strong> the human be<strong>in</strong>g there <strong>in</strong> only onereason, <strong>in</strong> feel<strong>in</strong>g, volition, <strong>and</strong> thought.” 47Overlook<strong>in</strong>g this conception of universality <strong>in</strong> Hegel’s doctr<strong>in</strong>e ofthought, Mr. McTaggart criticizes him for hold<strong>in</strong>g “that the highest activityof Spirit, <strong>in</strong> which all others are transcended <strong>and</strong> swallowed up, isthat of pure thought.” 48 Such a contention, we are <strong>in</strong>formed, ignores afact which Lotze has emphasized <strong>in</strong> many parts of his system. And thatfact is “that Spirit has two other aspects besides thought — namely,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!