12.07.2015 Views

Thought and Reality in Hegel's System

Thought and Reality in Hegel's System

Thought and Reality in Hegel's System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Thought</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Reality</strong><strong>in</strong> Hegel’s <strong>System</strong>Part IChapter I.<strong>Thought</strong> as Objective <strong>and</strong> Universal.Perhaps no part of Hegel’s system has been more persistently overlookedor misunderstood than has his doctr<strong>in</strong>e of the nature of thought.Certa<strong>in</strong>ly no part of his system deserves to be more carefully studied.For this is the doctr<strong>in</strong>e that is absolutely fundamental to his system; <strong>and</strong>it must be understood before any fair appreciation of his system can bearrived at or any just criticism of his contentions be advanced. To givean exposition of the Hegelian doctr<strong>in</strong>e of thought, <strong>and</strong> to do this asmuch as is practicable <strong>in</strong> the author’s own words, is the aim of thischapter.Almost universally it is taken for granted that the Logic conta<strong>in</strong>s allthat Hegel thought it worth while to say about the nature of thought. Hisepistemology is criticized <strong>and</strong> defended aga<strong>in</strong>st criticism exclusively onthe basis of the dialectical development of the categories, the assumptionof both critic <strong>and</strong> champion be<strong>in</strong>g that here we f<strong>in</strong>d Hegel’s lastword concern<strong>in</strong>g the nature of knowledge. That such an assumption iserroneous <strong>and</strong> leads to positive error <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g the Hegelian epistemologywill, I trust, appear <strong>in</strong> what is to follow. The Logic does, <strong>in</strong>deed,purport to give an account of the essentially organic nature of thought,by show<strong>in</strong>g how one category necessarily loses itself <strong>in</strong> its negative,which proves to be, not an abstract negative, but a negative that dialecticallyleads on to a more concrete synthesis of the two opposed categories.The Logic leads progressively from the abstract categories of Be<strong>in</strong>g,through the more concrete categories of Essence, to the still moreconcrete categories of the Notion; <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ally to the most concrete cat-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!